| Literature DB >> 35335500 |
Raquel Giménez1, Berna Serrano1, Verónica San-Miguel1, Juan Carlos Cabanelas1.
Abstract
Epoxy resins are thermosets with interesting physicochemical properties for numerous engineering applications, and considerable efforts have been made to improve their performance by adding nanofillers to their formulations. MXenes are one of the most promising functional materials to use as nanofillers. They have attracted great interest due to their high electrical and thermal conductivity, hydrophilicity, high specific surface area and aspect ratio, and chemically active surface, compatible with a wide range of polymers. The use of MXenes as nanofillers in epoxy resins is incipient; nevertheless, the literature indicates a growing interest due to their good chemical compatibility and outstanding properties as composites, which widen the potential applications of epoxy resins. In this review, we report an overview of the recent progress in the development of MXene/epoxy nanocomposites and the contribution of nanofillers to the enhancement of properties. Particularly, their application for protective coatings (i.e., anticorrosive and friction and wear), electromagnetic-interference shielding, and composites is discussed. Finally, a discussion of the challenges in this topic is presented.Entities:
Keywords: MXene; MXene/epoxy resin composites; epoxy nanocomposites; epoxy resin; polymer-hybrid composites
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335500 PMCID: PMC8954424 DOI: 10.3390/polym14061170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(a) Scheme of the obtention of different MXenes from their MAX phases. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2014 Wiley; (b) Delamination procedure includes HF/HCl treatment to etch Al atoms, intercalation, and delamination by shear and/or sonication. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [15]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society; (c) Ti3AlC2 after acid treatment (accordion-like); (d) Ti3C2Tx MXene sheets thoroughly exfoliated (images from the review authors).
Figure 2(a) Summary of publications of MXenes and MXenes and epoxy from 2017 to 2021; (b) Summary of MXene/epoxy publications (%) related to hBN/epoxy (grey) and graphene/epoxy (green) publications from 2017 to 2021. Data from 2022 are from January. Results from Web of Science (February 2022).
Figure 3Overview of the applications of MXenes in epoxy resins.
Comparison of processing methods of MXene/epoxy nanocomposites.
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical blending | Solvent-assisted blending |
Simple and versatile fabrication process Good dispersion of filler within the resin |
Use of organic solvent may impact environmental friendliness and cost Residual solvent could degrade the properties of nanocomposite Poor dispersion of filler at high concentrations Aqueous media easily oxidize MXene |
| Mechanical mixing |
Avoids the use of solvent Straightforward performance Good dispersion. The fillers can achieve highly exfoliated structure |
High filler contents are not well-dispersed Reduction in high aspect ratio of the 2D fillers High viscosities | |
| Infiltration and impregnation | Infiltration molding |
Easy processing, low cost, and minimum waste Ability to manufacture large complex parts Filler structure is maintained |
Time-consuming process Difficult to scale up Inferior mechanical properties |
| Vacuum-assisted impregnation | |||
Figure 4Diagram of processing methods of MXene/epoxy nanocomposites and related properties of nanocomposites fabricated by the corresponding method.
Figure 5(a) Scheme of the preparation of Attapulgite (ATP)-MXene hybrids. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2021 MDPI; (b) Tensile strength and elastic modulus for ATP-MXene/ER composites. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2021 MDPI; (c) Scheme of the preparation of SiO2-decorated, MXene-modified carbon fibers. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022 Society of Plastic Engineers; (d) Surface morphologies of CF (d1), CF/MXene (d2), and CF/MXene/SiO2 (d3). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022 Society of Plastic Engineers; (e) IFSS of the composites and SEM image of fracture surface of CF/MXene/SiO2 after debonding test. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022 Society of Plastic Engineers.
Compilation of the most relevant results obtained with MXene/ER composites.
| Filler * | Optimal Conc. (%) | Property | Performance ** (% Compared to Neat ER Except If Specified) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti2C | 1.0 | Mechanical | IS: 17.8 kJ/m2 (+76%); FS: 98 MPa (+66%) | [ |
| Ti3C2 | 5.0 | Young modulus of 4.36 GPa (+20%), nanoindentation | [ | |
| Ti3CN | 40–90 | Young mod. of 12.8 GPa (+182%) for 90% Ti3CN, nanoindentation | [ | |
| Ti3C2 | 1.2 | IS: 24.2 kJ/m2 (+146%); TS: 66.2 MPa (+18%) | [ | |
| MTHPA-Ti3C2 | 0.2 | TS: 106.4 MPa (+51%); FS: 157 MPa (+32%). MXene bonding to the matrix through MTHPA, which improves dispersion | [ | |
| ATP nanorods/MTHPA-Ti3C2 | 0.25/0.2 | TS: 132.2 MPa (+88%); FS: 187.5 MPa (+57%). Covalent bonding between ATP and functionalized MXene | [ | |
| a-SCF/Ti3C2 | 2.0 | TS: 141.2 MPa (+100%); FS: 199.3 MPa (+67%) | [ | |
| a-CF/Ti3C2 | 1.37 | Mechanical | Single-fiber test. IFSS: 122.8 MPa (+182% compared to a-CF composite) Ti3C2 chemically bridges CF and epoxy resin | [ |
| APTES-CF/Ti3C2 | 1.0 | TS: 1210.9 MPa (+48.8% comp. to APTES-CF composite); FS: 987.3 MPa (+45.9% comp. to APTES-CF composite); IFSS: 223 MPa (+38.5% comp. to APTES-CF composite). Mxenes strongly attached to the NH2 functionality of APTES-CF | [ | |
| a-CF/APTES-Ti2C | 0.2 mg/mL (DMF) | Single-fiber test. IFSS: 72.2 MPa (+78% compared to a-CF composite); ILSS: 44.2 MPa (+28% compared to a-CF composite). Amide bonding between a-CF and amino-functionalized Ti2C | [ | |
| PEI-CF/Ti3C2/APTES-SiO2 | 1 mg/mL (aq. Sol) | TS: 920 MPa (+26% compared to CF composite); FS: 1050 MPa (+39.2% compared to CF composite). Single-fiber test: IFSS: 72.75 MPa (+73.2%); ILSS: 78.7 MPa (+61.2%). Electrostatic assembly (positive PEI-CF/negative Ti3C2/positive APTES-SIO2). SiO2 enhances roughness and wettability with ER (+11% in IFSS and ILSS) | [ | |
| BSA-UHMWPE/Ti2C | 1 mg/mL (aq. Sol) | Ti2C-decorated UHMWPE conductive fabric. IFSS: 3.29 MPa (+116% compared to UHMWPE composite) | [ | |
| Ti3C2 | 1.0 | Thermal conductivity | TC: 0.587 W/mK (+141.3% compared to resin without additives) | [ |
| Ti3C2Tx | 30 | In-plane TC: 3.14 W/mK (+1470%); though-plane TC: 0.294 W/mK (+47%) | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx | 40 | In-plane TC: 1.29 W/mK (10.65 times better than ER); through-plane TC: 0.583 W/mK (2.92 times better than ER) | [ | |
| CF/Ti3C2 | 50.2 | TC: 9.68 W/mK (4509% compared to ER and 36.7% compared to CF composite) | [ | |
| Ag/Ti3C2 | 15/0.1 (vol) | In-plane TC: 1.70 W/mK (+827%); through-plane TC: 2.65 W/mK (+1225%) | [ | |
| CF/Ti3C2 | 1.0 | TC: 0.262 W/mK (+148% higher than ER) | [ | |
| Ag/Ti3C2 | 50/0.12 | TC: 72.7 W/mK (+24.7% higher than ER with 50% Ag) | [ | |
| Ag/Ti3C2 | 1.0 | TC: 0.382 W/mK (+135% higher than ER with Ag and +125% higher than ER with Ti3C2) | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/AgNWs | 4.1/4.1 | TC: 2.34 W/mK (+1014% higher than ER and +200% higher than ER with Ti3C2Tx) | [ | |
| RP-Ti3C2 | 2.0 | Fire retardancy | LOI: improve values from 24.4 to 26.3% compared to ER | [ |
| P-C-N/Ti3C2Tx | 3.0 | LOI: increase 38% compared to ER | [ | |
| CuP-Ti3C2 | 5.0 | PHRR: 64.4% less compared to neat epoxy | [ | |
| ZHS/Ti3C2Tx | 2.0 | PHRR: 629.41 kW/m2 (−54.41% compared to neat epoxy) | [ | |
| Ti3C2 | 3 | Tribological | COF: (−76.3%); WR: (−67.3%) | [ |
| APTES-Ti3C2 | 0.5 | COF: 0.357 (−34%); WR: 1.0 × 10−13 m3/(Nm) (−72.2%). Functionalization enhances dispersibility and reduces MXene amount | [ | |
| PTFE/PDDA-Ti3C2 | 2.0 | Electrostatic interaction PTFE/PDDA-Ti3C2. PTFE inhibits aggregation. FC is reduced 8.5 to 14 times, and WR is reduced 22 to 29 times, depending on the environmental conditions | [ | |
| ZrO2/Ti3C2 | 0.5 | COF: 0.6 (−35%); WR: 4.3 × 10−14 m3/(Nm) (−79.3%) | [ | |
| TiO2/Ti3C2 | 0.5 | COF: 0.6 (−35%); WR: 3.3 × 10−14 m3/(Nm) (−84.5%). TiO2 nanodot protuberances induce mechanical interlocking effect | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/LDH | 0.5 | WR was reduced by 80.45% compared to that of pure ER due to the synergy effect of MXene and layered LDH | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/carbon foam | 5 mg/mL | Radiation | Porous structure allows incident EMWs to enter the material, and EM energy is dissipated through 3D MXene foam with high TC | [ |
| Ni0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4/Ti3C2Tx | 3.0 | EMW-absorption improvement of coatings for cement-based materials | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/rGO | 0.74 (vol) | EMI | EMI SE: 56.4 dB (+210% compared to rGO composites) | [ |
| Ti3C2Tx/C hybrid foam | 1.64/2.61 | EMI SE: 46 dB and EC: 184 S/m (+480% and 3.1 × 104 times, respectively, compared to C hybrid foam/ER) | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/AgNWs | 4.1/4.1 | EMI SE: 94.1 dB (79% higher than the commercial materials) | [ | |
| Honeycomb rGO-Ti3C2Tx | 1.2–3.3 | EMI SE: 55 dB and EC: 387.1 S/m (2978 and 5 times, respectively, compared to non-honeycomb-structured nanocomposites) | [ | |
| APTES-Ti3C2Tx | 0.5 | Anticorrosive coating | |Z|0.01Hz increments by 2 order of magnitude, due to good interaction between amino group of APTES and epoxy matrix | [ |
| GPS-Ti3C2Tx | 0.5 | |Z|0.01Hz values 3 orders of magnitude. Good dispersibility because of the interaction between glycidyl groups of GPS and matrix | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/GO | 0.5 | Superior corrosion resistance because of barrier effect. Rc values 1 order of magnitude higher than that of pure ZRC epoxy coating | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/LDH | 0.5 | Good dispersibility and compatibility with ER. |Z|0.01Hz values increase by 1 order of magnitude | [ | |
| SF-Ti3C2TX | 0.5 | Excellent dispersion in ER. Impedance value 4 orders of magnitude higher than pure ER after 240 h immersion (20 MPa pressure) | [ | |
| p-CS-Ti3C2Tx | 0.2 | Uniform dispersion and distribution. Better compatibility with ER, reducing the porosity. |Z|0.01Hz more than 2 orders of magnitude higher | [ | |
| CD-Ti3C2Tx | 0.5 | With parallel arrangement, more than 4 orders improvement in impedance modulus, and Rc 4 and 2 orders of magnitude higher than pure ER and random CD-Ti3C2Tx coatings, respectively | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx | 2.8 | Self-healing | Self-healing was achieved in 10 s and 10 min under near-infrared and sunlight, respectively | [ |
* a-CF: activated carbon fibers; a-SCF: activated short carbon fibers; AgNWs: Ag nanowires; APTES: aminopropyl triethoxysilane; ATP: Attapulgite nanorods; BSA: Bovine serum albumin; CD: carbon dots; CF: carbon fiber; CuP: copper organophosphate; GPS: (3-glycidyloxypropyl) trimethoxy silane; LDH: layered double hydroxide; MTHPA: methyl tetrahydro phthalic anhydride; RP: red phosphorous; p-CS: phosphorylated chitosan; P-C-N: ammonium polyphosphate, dipentaerythritol and melamine; PDDA: polydiallyl dimethyl ammonium; PEI: polyethyleneimine; PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene latex; SF: silk fibroin; UHMWPE: ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibers; ZHS: zinc hydroxystannate; ** COF: friction coefficient; EC: electrical conductivity; EMI SE: electromagnetic-interference shielding effectiveness; EMW: electromagnetic wave; FS: flexural strength; IFSS: interfacial shear strength; ILSS: interlaminar shear strength; IS: impact strength (toughness); LOI: limiting oxygen index; PHRR: peak heat release rate; TC: thermal conductivity; TS: tensile strength; WR: wear rate; |Z|0.01Hz: impedance modulus at low frequency from Bode diagrams.
Figure 6(a) Schematic illustrating of fabrication for MXene@PTFE hybrid, preparation process, and friction test of epoxy composite coating. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [67]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier; (b) COF curves and (c) volume wear rates (W) of pure epoxy, PTFE/epoxy, MXene/epoxy, and MXene@PTFE/epoxy composite coatings under humid conditions (RH: ~80%). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [67]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier; (d) Friction coefficient (A) and wear rate (B) of TiO2/Ti3C2/epoxy nanocomposites with different mass frictions under a normal load of 8 N. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2021 MDPI. (e) Model of the interaction between TiO2/Ti3C2 and epoxy matrix in TiO2/Ti3C2/ER nanocomposites. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2021 MDPI.
Figure 7(a) Schematic diagram of the potential electromagnetic wave absorption mechanisms for the MS/CF/ER composites and SEM image of MX/CF foam at concentration of 5.0 mg/mL of Ti3C2Tx MXene. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier; (b) Schematic illustration of Ti3C2Tx MXene/RGO hybrid aerogel structure and EMI-shielding mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society; (c) STEM images of the TCTA/epoxy resin nanocomposites with 1.38 vol % of T3C2Tx. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2020 AAAS; (d) Schematic illustration of possible mechanism of EMI shielding and heat conduction in MXene/AgNWs/ER nanocomposite and SEM image of aerogel with 3 mm thickness. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier; (e) SEM images and schematic illustration of rGH, rGMH, and rGMH/epoxy nanocomposites. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 8(a) Nyquist plots with different immersion times (3 and 30 days) and impedance moduli of neat ER and (GPS)-Ti3C2TX coatings. Common equivalent circuits to fit EIS data. Model A [Rs(QcRc)] is the equivalent electrical circuit appropriate for describing the initial stage of immersion, and as the immersion time increased, the equivalent circuit is described by Model B [Rs(QcRc(QdlRct), where corrosion gradually penetrates into the epoxy coating, reaching the coating/metal interface. In Model C, the Warburg resistance (Rw) was included because of the tangential diffusion effect due to lamellar nanofiller addition. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [83]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier; (b) Schematic representation of corrosion process of neat epoxy, 0.2 wt % MXene, and 0.2 wt % functionalized MXene coating. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland; (c) TEM images of ultrathin section (A–E) showing neat ER, unmodified-Ti3C2Tx-0.5, and epoxy functionalized-Ti3C2Tx, epoxy coatings. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [83]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.