| Literature DB >> 35335348 |
Tarek Gamal Abedelmaksoud1,2, Sobhy Mohamed Mohsen1, Lene Duedahl-Olesen2, Ammar B Altemimi3, Mohamed Mohamed Elnikeety1, Francesco Cacciola4, Aberham Hailu Feyissa2.
Abstract
Processing technique and storage conditions are the main factors that affect the phytochemical profile of Not-from-Concentrate (NFC) juice, which could decrease the nutritional and bioactive properties of the corresponding juice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality changes that occurred in NFC mango juice after Ohmicsonication (OS) and during storage in comparison to other processing methods such as sonication (S), thermosonication (TS), ohmic heating (OH), and conventional heating (CH). Quality attributes such as polyphenoloxidase (PPO) and pectinmethylesterase (PME) activities, ascorbic acid and hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) contents, total phenolics, total flavonoids, total carotenoids, electric conductivity, color values and microbial load (total plate count, mold, yeast, and psychrophilic bacteria) were examined. OS and OH treatments demonstrated the highest inactivation of PPO (100%), while CH and TS displaying inhibitions 89% and 90%, respectively and only S treatment exhibited insufficient inactivation of both PPO and microbial load. However, the inhibition of PME followed the order OS (96.5%) > OH (94.9%) > TS (92.5%) > CH (88.5%). The best treatment, with the highest retention of phytochemical contents (ascorbic acid, total carotenoids, antioxidant activity, total flavonoids, and total phenolic content) for NFC mango juice and during storage was obtained with OS treated samples compared to other treatments (in the order from the lowest to highest percentage, OS < OH < TS < CH). Consequently, the results indicated that OS could be applied as a new mild thermal treatment in the production of mango juice with improved quality properties of stored NFC mango juice.Entities:
Keywords: carotenoids; mango juice; microbial load; ohmicsonication; polyphenoloxidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335348 PMCID: PMC8950190 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phytochemicals profiles, Enzymatic activities and microbial load of fresh mango juice (FMJ) treated by S, CH, TS, OH, and OS.
| Parameters | FMJ | S | CH | TS | OH | OS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascorbic acid (mg/100 mL) | 23.39 ± 0.74 a | 21.05 ± 0.08 b | 18.93 ± 0.15 e | 19.96 ± 0.12 d | 20.37 ± 0.23 c | 20.75 ± 0.14 c |
| TCC (μg/100 g) | 9688.29 ± 37.72 b | 9912.95 ± 53.14 a | 7963.12 ± 39.53 f | 8661.84 ± 46.56 e | 8808.82 ± 24.48 d | 9119.55 ± 54.98 c |
| Antioxidant activity (%) | 65.57 ± 2.02 e | 68.74 ± 3.40 a | 59.97 ± 0.96 f | 63.74 ± 3.66 c | 61.62 ± 1.99 d | 64.37 ± 3.28 b |
| TF (mg/100 mL) | 18.93 ± 0.18 f | 21.81 ± 0.32 a | 19.60 ± 0.15 e | 20.83 ± 0.31 c | 19.96 ± 0.24 d | 21.14 ± 0.27 b |
| TP (mg/100 mL) | 32.36 ± 0.13 f | 35.97 ± 0.31 a | 33.48 ± 0.05 e | 34.06 ± 0.23 c | 33.63 ± 0.17 d | 34.358 ± 0.226 b |
| HMF (mg/L) | nd | nd | 8.71 ± 0.03 a | 8.32 ± 0.05 a | 7.27 ± 0.06 b | 6.90 ± 0.04 c |
| PPO (U/mL/min) | 44.65 ± 2.66 a | 27.87 ± 2.42 b | 4.81 ± 0.55 c | 4.37 ± 0.87 c | nd | nd |
| PME (U/mL/min) | 20.57 ± 0.61 a | 14.76 ± 0.89 b | 2.27 ± 0.20 c | 1.55 ± 0.07 d | 1.06 ± 0.05 e | 0.73 ± 0.05 f |
| TPC (log cfu/mL) | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 2.23 ± 0.07 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| PB (log cfu/mL) | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| M and Y (log cfu/mL) | 2.48 ± 0.02 | 1.58 ± 0.22 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
a, b, c, d, e, f indicate statistical significance compared with the control, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05); data are means ± S.D. (n = 3); nd: not detected; TP: total phenolic; TF: total flavonoids content; TCC: total carotenoids content; HMF: hydroxyl methyl furfural; PPO: polyphenoloxidase; PME: pectinmethylesterase; TPC: total plate count; PB: psychrophilic bacteria and M and Y: mold and yeast, FMJ: Fresh mango juice; S: Sonication; CH: conventional heating; TS: Thermosonication; OH: ohmic heating; OS: Ohmicsonication.
Figure 1Effect of storage time (0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 months) on PPO and PME activity in percent of NFC mango juice treated by CH (A), TS (B), OH (C) and OS (D); a, b, c, d, e indicate statistical significance compared with the control, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05); data are means ± S.D. (n = 3). PPO: polyphenoloxidase; PME: Pectinmethylesterase; OS: Ohmicsonication; TS: Thermosonication; OH: ohmic heating; CH: conventional heating.
Figure 2Effect of storage time (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 months) on HMF concentration of NFC mango juice. HMF: Hydroxymethyl furfural; OS: Ohmicsonication; TS: Thermosonication; OH: ohmic heating; CH: conventional heating. Within lines, different letters indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05); data are means ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 3Effect of storage time (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 months) on ascorbic acid (A), TC (B), TP (C) and TF (D) contents of NFC mango juice. TP: total phenolic; TF: total flavonoids content; TCC: total carotenoids content; OS: Ohmicsonication; TS: Thermosonication; OH: ohmic heating; CH: conventional heating. Within lines, different letters indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05); data are means ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 4NFC mango juice processing diagram.