| Literature DB >> 35335135 |
Ewan Couic1, Alicia Tribondeau2, Vanessa Alphonse1, Alexandre Livet1, Noureddine Bousserrhine1.
Abstract
Understanding ecological trajectories after mine site rehabilitation is essential to develop relevant protocols adapted for gold mining sites. This study describes the influence of a range of mine site rehabilitation and revegetation protocols on soil physicochemical parameters and microbial activities related to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. We sampled soil from six rehabilitated mining sites in French Guiana with different plant cover (herbaceous, Cyperaceous, monoculture of Clitoria racemosa and Acacia mangium and association of C. racemosa and A. mangium). We measured the mineralization potential of organic matter by estimating the mineralization of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus and the microbial catabolic diversity balance. The results showed an improvement in the quality of organic matter on revegetated sites with tree cover. On restored sites with fabaceous species, the microbial biomass is three times higher than non-restored sites, improving the rates of organic matter mineralization and restoring the catabolic diversity to the level of natural Guyanese soils. These results confirm that the establishment of fabaceous species under controlled conditions significantly improves the restoration of microbial communities in mining soils.Entities:
Keywords: biogeochemistry; catabolic diversity; ecological restoration; fabaceous species; gold mining; microbial community
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335135 PMCID: PMC8949060 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Ctot, Ntot, Ptot: total C, N and P; DOC: total organic carbon; MBC: microbial biomass carbon; total Fe, Al, Hg: total iron, aluminum and mercury content. NR: non-restored sites, R: restored sites. Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are non-restored mining sites. Cli is a restored site with C. racemosa, Aca is a restored site with A. mangium, and Mf is a mixed fabaceous species (n = 5, mean ± SD). For each parameter, values followed by different letters differ significantly with p < 0.05 with Tukey’s HSD test.
| Sites | Restored | Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ctot | DOC | Ntot | Ptot | C/N | pH-H2O | Fe | Al | Hg | Clay | Silt | Sand | ||
| g·kg−1 | g·kg−1 | g·kg−1 | g·kg−1 | g·kg−1 | g·kg−1 | µg·kg−1 | % | % | % | ||||
| Sp1 | NR | 6.01b ± 0.32 | 3.88ab ± 0.04 | 0.40b ± 0.03 | 0.21ab ± 0.04 | 15.02b ± 0.30 | 5.26ab ± 0.23 | 65.15b ± 3.17 | 53.88b ± 1.53 | 0.23a ± 0.01 | 46.4c ± 3.6 | 41.5b ± 2.8 | 3.3a ± 0.2 |
| Sp2 | NR | 3.52a ± 0.37 | 2.47a ± 0.23 | 0.14a ± 0.02 | 0.13a ± 0.01 | 25.14c ± 1.08 | 5.3b ± 0.13 | 66.2b ± 2.1 | 16.4a ± 0.6 | 0.27a ± 0.02 | 7.5a ± 2.7 | 21a ± 2 | 71.1d ± 1.6 |
| Sp3 | NR | 9.55b ± 0.73 | 5.84b ± 0.35 | 0.45b ± 0.01 | 0.27b ± 0.07 | 21.2c ± 1.27 | 4.66ab ± 0.07 | 44.56a ± 0.77 | 41.33b ± 1.77 | 0.23a ± 0.07 | 22.2b ± 5.1 | 65.8c ± 3.2 | 11.8b ± 1.2 |
| Cli | R | 7.01b ± 0.83 | 5.0b ± 0.4 | 0.40b ± 0.04 | 0.17a ± 0.02 | 17.52b ± 1.35 | 5.0ab ± 0.03 | 113.3c ± 4.2 | 25.5a ± 2.15 | 0.28a ± 0.03 | 21.3b ± 1.6 | 24.8a ± 3.7 | 53.9c ± 2.5 |
| Aca | R | 14.11c ± 1.2 | 10.55c ± 0.62 | 1.12c ± 0.07 | 0.37b ± 0.12 | 12.6a ± 0.54 | 4.21a ± 0.07 | 53.69ab ± 4.15 | 45.31b ± 6.51 | 0.48b ± 0.04 | 18.4b ± 2.5 | 35.6b ± 3.9 | 41.6c ± 4.4 |
| Mf | R | 22.88d ± 1.5 | 15.58d ± 1.41 | 1.81d ± 0.10 | 0.76c ± 0.15 | 12.64a ± 0.41 | 4.66ab ± 0.11 | 71.02b ± 1.37 | 43.76b ± 1.21 | 0.41b ± 0.05 | 19.8b ± 3.8 | 32.4b ± 4.9 | 36.4c ± 5.9 |
MBC: microbial biomass carbon; Cmin (SIR); Cmin, NH4+-Nmin, NO3−-Nmin, Pmin: organic C mineralization rate, mineralized NH4+-N, mineralized NO3−-N, total N mineralization rate, organic P mineralization rate. All mineralization rates are expressed in micrograms per gram of soil per day. NR: non-restored sites, R: restored sites. Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are non-restored mining sites. Cli is a restored site with C. racemosa, Aca is a restored site with A. mangium, and Mf is a mixed fabaceous species (n = 5, mean ± SD). For each parameter, values followed by different letters differ significantly with p < 0.05 with Tukey’s HSD test.
| Sites | Restored | MBC | Cmin | NO3−-Nmin | NH4+-Nmin | Ntotmin | Pmin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg kg−1 | µg g−1day−1 | µg g−1day−1 | µg g−1day−1 | µg g−1day−1 | µg g−1day−1 | ||
| Sp1 | NR | 224.5a ± 13.2 | 4.45a ± 0.32 | 0.008a ± 0.001 | 0.13a ± 0.06 | 0.14a ± 0.07 | 0.017a ± 0.003 |
| Sp2 | NR | 390.5a ± 77.3 | 4.96a ± 1.1 | 0.07b ± 0.006 | 0.8b ± 0.2 | 0.88c ± 0.2 | 0.024a ± 0.002 |
| Sp3 | NR | 312.6a ± 10.1 | 5.77a ± 0.37 | 0.004a ± 0.0003 | 0.45ab ± 0.05 | 0.46b ± 0.05 | 0.03b ± 0.002 |
| Cli | R | 845.2b ± 38.5 | 35.37b ± 1.4 | 1.56d ± 0.35 | 1.15c ± 0.15 | 2.7e ± 0.44 | 0.047c ± 0.007 |
| Aca | R | 909b ± 69 | 39.14bc ± 1.9 | 0.33c ± 0.12 | 1.2c ± 0.32 | 1.55d ± 0.33 | 0.058cd ± 0.006 |
| Mf | R | 1103b ± 88 | 46.58c ± 1.5 | 0.35c ± 0.11 | 1.7d ± 0.14 | 2.03e ± 0.07 | 0.065d ± 0.008 |
Figure 1Percentage degradation of substrates according to biochemical categories for the various rehabilitated soils. Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are non-restored mining sites. Cli is a restored site with C. racemosa, Aca is a restored site with A. mangium, and Mf is a mixed fabaceous species. The value in each bar of the histograms is the average value of positive wells (n = 5) for the different substrate categories. The value at the top of each histogram corresponds to the average value of positive substrates for each of the sites studied (n = 5).
AWCD: average well color development, PFR: potential functional richness, catabolic diversity, H: Shannon Index, EH: regularity index, NR: non-restored sites, R: restored sites. Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are non-restored mining sites. Cli is a restored site with C. racemosa, Aca is a restored site with A. mangium, and Mf is a mixed fabaceous species (n = 5, mean ± SD). For each parameter, values followed by different letters differ significantly with p < 0.05 with Tukey’s HSD test.
| Sites | Restored | AWCD | PFR | Catabolic Diversity | H | EH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sp1 | NR | 0.08a ± 0.01 | 3.6a ± 0.9 | 0.12a ± 0.02 | 1.2a ± 0.11 | 0.76a ± 0.05 |
| Sp2 | NR | 0.18b ± 0.1 | 6.6ab ± 2.1 | 0.21b ± 0.07 | 1.9ab ± 0.47 | 0.53a ± 0.25 |
| Sp3 | NR | 0.09a ± 0.02 | 3.8a ± 0.8 | 0.12a ± 0.03 | 1.3a ± 0.44 | 0.88b ± 0.036 |
| Cli | R | 0.34c ± 0.13 | 9.6b ± 1.9 | 0.31c± 0.06 | 2.1b ± 0.12 | 0.92b ± 0.015 |
| Aca | R | 0.32c ± 0.1 | 15.2c ± 3.2 | 0.49d ± 0.11 | 2.6c ± 0.22 | 0.95b ± 0.027 |
| Mf | R | 0.49d ± 0.09 | 19.2c ± 1.1 | 0.62d ± 0.04 | 3.3c ± 0.11 | 0.98b ± 0.01 |
Effects of vegetation and level of restoration in a one-way ANOVA. Bold values are significant (p < 0.05), “*” indicates a p-value 0.01 < p < 0.05, “**” indicates a p-value 0.001 < p < 0.1.
| Sites | Level of Restoration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Df | 5 | 1 | |
| Total organic carbon | F-value |
|
|
| Total nitrogen |
|
| |
| Total phosphorus |
|
| |
| Microbial biomass carbon |
|
| |
| Carbon mineralization |
|
| |
| Nitrate mineralization (NO3−-Nmin) |
|
| |
| Ammonium mineralization |
|
| |
| Phosphorus mineralization |
|
| |
| Average well color development (AWCD) |
|
| |
| Potential functional richness |
|
| |
| Catabolic diversity |
|
| |
| Shannon Index |
|
| |
| Regularity index |
|
|
Pearson correlation coefficients (n = 30) between microbial biomass carbon (MBC), mineralization rates and microbial catabolic diversity parameters; bold values are significant at p < 0.05.
| Variables | MBC | C_min | NO3_min | NH4_min | Ntot_min | P_min | PFR | Diversity | H | EH | AWCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C_min | - |
| 0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NO3_min | - | - |
|
|
| 0.36 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| NH4_min | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ntot_min | - | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| P_min | - | - | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PFR | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
| Diversity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
| H | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.28 |
|
| EH | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.35 |
| AWCD | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Figure 2Principal component analysis on the most explanatory variables and representative of the variability of the database. (Left): projection of dataset variability plotted on a factorial map of the first two discriminating axes according to site factor: Sp1, 2 and 3. Spontaneous vegetation, Cli: monoculture of C. racemosa, Aca: monoculture of A. mangium, Mf: mixed fabaceous culture. (Right): correlation circles plot with variable vectors (MBC, C/N/P mineralization, total CNP, total Al/Fe/Hg, clay, silt, sand, pH, PFR, IR, Shannon Index, Mining_stop—number of years after mining stopped, Plt_cover—approximate percentage of vegetation cover (according to the classification of Tropical Ecosystem Environment Observations) for each respective factor. Eigen values 52.07%, 20.18% for axes 1 to 2, respectively. Randtest: simulated p-value: 0.001.
Main characteristics of the 6 sampled sites.
| Sites | Sp1 | Sp2 | Sp3 | Cli | Aca | Mf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level of restoration | Non-restored | Non-restored | Non-restored | Restored | Restored | Restored |
| Pioneer species | Herbaceous species |
|
| |||
| Type of vegetation cover | Almost bare soil | Grassland | Grassland | Coppiced forest | Dense forest | Dense forest |
| End of mining (year) | 1998 | 1998 | 2013 | 2013 | 1998 | 1998 |
| Geographical coordinates | N 04°30.311′/ | N 04°30.311′/ | N 04°22.509′/ | N 04°29.860′/ | N 04°29.860′/ | N 04°29.860′/ |
Figure 3Illustration of some examples of different stages of ecological restoration on former Guyanese gold mining sites and geographical location of the Yaoni and Belizon mines in French Guiana. Non-restored site Sp1 (a), non-restored site Sp2 with herbaceous species after 3 years (b), ecological restoration with fabaceous species after 3 years ((c), Cli), ecological restoration with fabaceous species after 18 years ((d), Mf). The pictures were taken during a second sampling campaign in April 2016 at sites undergoing ecological restoration.