| Literature DB >> 35335116 |
Mohammad K Okla1, Samina Rubnawaz2, Turki M Dawoud1, Saud Al-Amri1, Mohamed A El-Tayeb1, Mostafa A Abdel-Maksoud3, Nosheen Akhtar4, Ahlem Zrig5, Gehad AbdElgayed6, Hamada AbdElgawad7.
Abstract
Pelargonium graveolens, rose-scented geranium, is commonly used in the perfume industry. P. graveolens is enriched with essential oils, phenolics, flavonoids, which account for its tremendous biological activities. Laser light treatment and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation can further enhance the phytochemical content in a significant manner. In this study, we aimed to explore the synergistic impact of these two factors on P. graveolens. For this, we used four groups of surface-sterilized seeds: (1) control group1 (non-irradiated; non-colonized group); (2) control group2 (mycorrhizal colonized group); (3) helium-neon (He-Ne) laser-irradiated group; (4) mycorrhizal colonization coupled with He-Ne laser-irradiation group. Treated seeds were growing in artificial soil inculcated with Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41833, in a climate-controlled chamber. After 6 weeks, P. graveolens plants were checked for their phytochemical content and antibacterial potential. Laser light application improved the mycorrhizal colonization in P. graveolens plants which subsequently increased biomass accumulation, minerals uptake, and biological value of P. graveolens. The increase in the biological value was evident by the increase in the essential oils production. The concomitant application of laser light and mycorrhizal colonization also boosted the antimicrobial activity of P. graveolens. These results suggest that AMF co-treatment with laser light could be used as a promising approach to enhance the metabolic content and yield of P. graveolens for industrial and pharmaceutical use.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; essential oils; laser light; mycorrhizal inoculum; synergistic effect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335116 PMCID: PMC8954123 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of irradiation and mycorrhizal inoculation on growth parameters.
| Growth Parameters | No Irradiation | Laser Irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mycorrhizal | Control | Mycorrhizal | |
| Colonization (% root) | 0 ± 0 a | 38.7 ± 3.1 b | 0 ± 0 a | 49.3 ± 3.7 c |
| Hyphal length (cm/g soil) | 0 ± 0 a | 13.1 ± 1.4 b | 0 ± 0 a | 19.4 ± 0.7 c |
| Number of arbuscules/cm root | 0 ± 0 a | 5.2 ± 0.2 b | 0 ± 0 a | 6.8 ± 0.3 c |
Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, different superscripts (a–c) show statistical significance among the data at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Impact of laser light and mycorrhizal co-treatment on plant biomass. Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01.
Biological content of P. graveolens.
| Metabolites (mg/g DW) | No Irradiation | Laser Irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mycorrhizal | Control | Mycorrhizal | |
| Total protein | 148.68 ± 8 a | 158.3 ± 9 b | 163.5 ± 11.8 b | 186.5 ± 6.5 c |
| Total sugar | 59.68 ± 2.6 a | 61.7 ± 3.6 a | 64.1 ± 3.9 a | 76.4 ± 3.1 b |
| Total phenols | 11.07 ± 1.2 a | 14.5 ± 1 b | 17.5 ± 1 a | 21.5 ± 1 c |
| Total flavonoids | 0.53 ± 0.1 a | 0.8 ± 0.1 b | 0.8 ± 0.1 b | 1.2 ± 0.1 c |
| Total alkaloid | 18.5 ± 1.6 a | 26.3 ± 2 b | 19.4 ± 2.4 a | 24.1 ± 2.9 b |
Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, different superscripts (a–c) show statistical significance among the data at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of laser light and mycorrhizal co-treatment on plant (a) ash and (b) crude fibers content. Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, ns = non-significant.
Effect of mycorrhiza and laser light on mineral uptake by P. graveolens.
| Minerals (mg/g DW) | No Irradiation | Laser Irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mycorrhizal | Control | Mycorrhizal | |
| K | 12.2 ± 0.7 a | 17.7 ± 0.5 b | 16.4 ± 0.8 b | 26.9 ± 0.7 c |
| P | 4.57 ± 0.4 a | 6.67 ± 0.3 b | 5.89 ± 0.6 a | 8.16 ± 0.3 c |
| Ca | 2.32 ± 0.3 a | 3.4 ± 0.2 ab | 2.95 ± 0.2 a | 4.3 ± 0.3 b |
| Mg | 1.81 ± 0.3 a | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | 2 ± 0.3 a | 3.47 ± 0.3 b |
| Na | 0.39 ± 0.1 a | 0.61 ± 0.1 b | 0.53 ± 0.1 ab | 0.65 ± 0.1 b |
| Fe | 0.15 ± 0 a | 0.23 ± 0 ab | 0.21 ± 0 a | 0.27 ± 0 bc |
| Zn | 0.04 ± 0 a | 0.06 ± 0 a | 0.06 ± 0 a | 0.05 ± 0 a |
Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, different superscripts (a–c) show statistical significance among the data at p < 0.05.
Essential oil content in control and treated P. graveolens.
| Parameters | No Irradiation | Laser Irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mycorrhizal | Control | Mycorrhizal | |
|
| 12.8 ± 0.3 a | 12.7 ± 0.5 a | 13.4 ± 0.5 a | 16.8 ± 0.4 b |
|
| 3.1 ± 0.1 a | 3.48 ± 0.2 a | 3.8 ± 0.2 a | 4.6 ± 0.1 a |
|
| ||||
| Beta-Citronellol | 16.4 ± 0.1 a | 17.1 ± 0.1 a | 18.3 ± 0.1 b | 20.4 ± 0.1 b |
| Citronellyl formate | 7.3 ± 0.6 a | 7.8 ± 0.8 a | 8.9 ± 0.9 a | 9.3 ± 0.7 b |
| Citronellyl propionate | 0.09 ± 0 a | 0.08 ± 0 a | 0.09 ± 0 a | 0.14 ± 0 b |
| Geraniol | 20.1 ± 0.8 a | 27.7 ± 1 b | 22.6 ± 1.1 b | 34.8 ± 0.9 c |
| Geraniol formate | 7.05 ± 0.7 a | 8.73 ± 1 a | 7.76 ± 1 a | 9.8 ± 0.8 b |
| α-pinene | 1.04 ± 0.1 a | 1.68 ± 0.1 a | 1.68 ± 0.1 a | 1.7 ± 0.1 a |
| Limonene | 0.17 ± 0 a | 0.16 ± 0 a | 0.15 ± 0 a | 0.26 ± 0 b |
| Myrcene | 0.33 ± 0 a | 0.19 ± 0 a | 0.19 ± 0 a | 0.18 ± 0 a |
| Linalool | 4.04 ± 0.1 a | 4.99 ± 0.2 b | 4.17 ± 0.2 a | 5.33 ± 0.1 b |
| Cis-β-ocimene | 0.24 ± 0.1 a | 0.27 ± 0.1 a | 0.25 ± 0.1 a | 0.31 ± 0.1 a |
| Sabinene | 0.3 ± 0 a | 0.5 ± 0 b | 0.27 ± 0 a | 0.48 ± 0 b |
| p-cymene | 0.57 ± 0 a | 0.52 ± 0 a | 0.54 ± 0 a | 0.8 ± 0 b |
| Beta-phellandrene | 0.7 ± 0.1 a | 0.75 ± 0.1 a | 0.95 ± 0.1 b | 0.91 ± 0.1 b |
| I-Menthol | 0.04 ± 0.1 a | 0.13 ± 0.2 b | 0.04 ± 0.2 a | 0.08 ± 0.1 b |
| I-Menthone | 4.55 ± 0.2 a | 5.12 ± 0.2 a | 5.36 ± 0.2 a | 5.9 ± 0.2 a |
| Nerol | 3.66 ± 0.2 a | 4.18 ± 0.3 a | 4.31 ± 0.3 a | 5.91 ± 0.3 b |
| Beta-bourbonene | 0.75 ± 0.4 a | 1.02 ± 0.5 a | 0.82 ± 0.5 a | 0.93 ± 0.4 a |
| Beta-cubebene | 0.94 ± 0.2 a | 1.11 ± 0.3 a | 1.55 ± 0.3 ab | 2.6 ± 0.2 b |
| z-citral | 0.04 ± 0 a | 0.05 ± 0 a | 0.05 ± 0 a | 0.06 ± 0 a |
| α-Terpinene | 0.04 ± 0 a | 0.07 ± 0 b | 0.04 ± 0 a | 0.085 ± 0 b |
| Trans-caryophyllene | 1.67 ± 0 a | 1.84 ± 0 a | 1.97 ± 0 a | 1.97 ± 0 a |
| Isoledene | 1.4 ± 0 a | 2.55 ± 0 b | 1.65 ± 0 b | 2.95 ± 0 b |
| Germacrene-D | 3.83 ± 0 a | 3.48 ± 0 a | 3.71 ± 0 a | 5.3 ± 0 b |
| Ledene | 3.19 ± 0 a | 3.31 ± 0 a | 3.53 ± 0 a | 3.97 ± 0 a |
| δ-cadinene | 1.83 ± 0 a | 1.52 ± 0 a | 1.61 ± 0 a | 2.7 ± 0 b |
| Neryl acetate | 1.58 ± 0 a | 2.75 ± 0.1 b | 1.64 ± 0.1 a | 2.97 ± 0 b |
| Geranyl tiglate | 1.77 ± 0.1 a | 1.98 ± 0.1 a | 3.15 ± 0.1 b | 3.37 ± 0.1 b |
| Mintsulfide | 2.5 ± 0.7 a | 4.62 ± 0.9 b | 4.46 ± 1 b | 6.12 ± 0.8 c |
|
| ||||
| Phenylalanine | 3.37 ± 0.2 a | 3.43 ± 0.3 a | 3.53 ± 0.3 a | 5.41 ± 0.2 b |
| Cinnamic acid | 4.55 ± 0.4 a | 7.36 ± 0.5 b | 3.32 ± 0.6 a | 7.4 ± 0.5 b |
| Shikimic acid | 72.9 ± 2.5 a | 87.6 ± 3.4 b | 81.21 ± 3.6 a | 90.4 ± 1.4 b |
Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, different superscripts (a–c) show statistical significance among the data at p < 0.05.
Antibacterial activities of P. graveolens.
| Bacterial Specie | No Irradiation | Laser Irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mycorrhizal | Control | Mycorrhizal | |
| Zones of Inhibition (mm) | ||||
|
| 13.2 ± 0.6 a | 21 ± 1.3 b | 18.1 ± 0.8 b | 25.1 ± 1 c |
|
| 21.8 ± 0.4 a | 30 ± 1.4 b | 23.54 ± 1 a | 32.1 ± 0.9 b |
|
| 18.6 ± 0.6 a | 25 ± 1.8 b | 16.05 ± 0.8 a | 35.31 ± 1.2 c |
|
| 19.3 ± 1 a | 29 ± 1.1 b | 17.98 ± 0.9 a | 23.54 ± 1 a |
|
| 14.7 ± 0.5 a | 23 ± 1.2 b | 22.47 ± 1.2 b | 31.03 ± 0.9 c |
|
| 15.8 ± 1.2 a | 22 ± 1 b | 14.98 ± 1.8 a | 23.54 ± 1.1 b |
Values are presented as mean ± SD whereas, different superscripts (a–c) show statistical significance among the data at p < 0.05.