| Literature DB >> 35334683 |
Miranda Fateri1, João Falcão Carneiro2, Constantin Schuler1, João Bravo Pinto3, Fernando Gomes de Almeida2, Udo Grabmeier1, Tobias Walcher1, Michael Salinas4.
Abstract
In this paper, additive manufacturing was used in order to produce hose prototypes for peristaltic linear pneumatic actuators. In order to optimise the endurance of the actuator, we 3D printed different thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers with different shore hardness levels using ARBURG Plastic Freeforming technology. Furthermore, effects of the hose geometries on the lifetime of the actuator were investigated. Experimental evidence showed that the lifetime of the actuator was dependent on the combination of the hose design and on the material used to manufacture the hose. Moreover, experimental tests showed that the use of the Aurburg-Freeformer 3D printing technology led to a much higher hose endurance than the one reported by using the fused layer manufacturing technique.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; additive manufacturing; linear peristaltic actuators; pneumatic actuators; thermoplastic elastomers
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334683 PMCID: PMC8951359 DOI: 10.3390/mi13030392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Different views of the hose designs A and B.
| Model | Design |
|---|---|
| A: |
|
| B: |
|
Mechanical properties of the print materials.
| Material | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Shore hardness/(DIN ISO 7619-1) | 60 A | 82 A |
| Tensile strength (MPa)/(DIN 53504-S2/ISO 37) | 27 | 45 |
| Elongation at break (%)/(DIN 53504-S2/ISO 37) | 750 | 600 |
| Stress at 20% elongation (MPa)/(DIN 53504-S2/ISO 37) | 1 | 2.5 |
| Stress at 100% elongation (MPa)/(DIN 53504-S2/ISO 37) | 2.5 | 6 |
Figure 1Printing principle of ARBURG Plastic Freeforming (APF) machine (Credit: Arburg GmbH + Co KG).
Process parameters of the TPE 60 A material.
| Parameter | Range | Interval | Optimum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build chamber temperature (°C) | 0 and 60–100 | 20 | 60 |
| Feed rate part carrier (mm/s) | 100–250 | 50 | 200 |
| Feed rate, discrete extrusion (mm/s) | 10–20 | 15 | 5 |
| Feed rate, continuous extrusion (mm/s) | 40–65 | 5 | 50 |
| Drop aspect ratio | 1.28–1.36 | 0.02 | 1.30 |
| Material discharge (%) | 65, 67, 70 | - | 70 |
Figure 2Progress in 3D printed part’s quality by using internal support structures from left to right.
Figure 3Mechanism to impose the force between rollers.
Figure 4Experimental setup for leakage measurements.
Figure 5Geometrical details of the designs A and B (a,b) and pictures of the 3D printed parts for designs A1, B1, A2, and B2 (c–f), respectively. All dimensions are in millimeters.
Figure 6Hose compression force used for each hose design and material.
Figure 7Average number of performed cycles for each hose until failure.
Figure 8Influence of pressure (3 bar) in the hose shape: (a) B1 not pressurised; (b) B1 pressurised; (c) B2 not pressurised; (d) B2 pressurised.