| Literature DB >> 35334675 |
Farrah Aida Arris1,2, Denesh Mohan1,2, Mohd Shaiful Sajab1,2.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has allowed enormous advancement in technology and material development; thus, it requires attention in developing functionalized printed materials. AM can assist in efficiently manufacturing complex tailored electrodes for electrochemical sensing in the food industry. Herein, we used a commercial fused deposition modeling (FDM) filament of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) for FDM 3D printing of a self-designed electrode with minimal time and cost compared to a commercial electrode. A graphene-based ABS conductive filament (ABS-G) was used to fabricate the conductive electrode in a dual-nozzle FDM 3D printer. The electrochemically conductive 3D printed electrode was characterized using cyclic voltammetry and tested against standard 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) with known concentrations using an amperometric detection method. Results showed a basis for promising application to detect and quantify 3-MCPD, a food contaminant known for its carcinogenic potential. The fabrication of functionalized 3D printed polymer electrodes paves way for the development of complete 3D printable electrochemical sensors. Under optimal conditions, this newly synthesized electrochemical sensor exhibited sensitivity with a linear response range from 6.61 × 10-4 to 2.30 × 10-3 µg/mL with an estimated limit of detection of 3.30 × 10-4 µg/mL against 3-MCPD.Entities:
Keywords: 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD); additive manufacturing; cyclic voltammetry; electrodeposition; palm oil contaminant; zero-valent iron (ZVI)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334675 PMCID: PMC8948825 DOI: 10.3390/mi13030383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Fabrication process of 3D printed composite electrode. (a) Computer-aided design model, (b) G-code generation, (c) FDM 3D printing.
Figure 2(a) Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and EDX images of the 3D printed ABS-G electrode; (b) FE-SEM and EDX images of the 3D printed ABS-G electrode with electrochemically deposited ZVI.
Figure 3Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) of 3D printed filaments.
Figure 4(a) CV curves of ABS, ABS-G, and ABS-G with electrodeposited ZVI; (b) electrodeposition of ZVI for five scan cycles using CV mode.
Figure 5(a) Amperometric curves of ABS, ABS-G, and ABS-G with electrodeposited ZVI; (b) calibration plot of current measured versus 3-MCPD concentration (R = 0.9539).
Comparison between electrochemical 3-MCPD sensors based on past reports.
| Electrode | Method of | Linear Range | Lower Detection Limit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glassy carbon electrode (GCE)/nanoporous gold (NPG)/molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) | Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) | 10−16 to 10−7 mol/L | 3.5 × 10−17 mol/L | [ |
| Glassy carbon electrode (GCE)/hemoglobin immobilized with magnetic molecularly imprinted nanoparticles (Hb-MMIPs NPs) | Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) | 1.0 to 160.0 mg/L | 0.25 mg/L | [ |
| Gold (Au)/cysteine-coated silver nanoparticles (Cys-AgNPs) | Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) | 2.5 to 200 ng/mL | 2.4 ng/mL | [ |
| Glassy carbon electrode (GCE)/carboxylated multi-wall carbon nanotubes cMWCNT)/metal–organic framework (MOF-199) | Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) | 1.0 x 10−9 to 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L | 4.3 × 10−10 mol/L | [ |
| GCE/AuN/p-ATP | Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) | 1.0 x 10−17 to 1.0 × 10−13 mol/L | 3.8 × 10−18 mol/L | [ |