Literature DB >> 30172331

3D printing for electroanalysis: From multiuse electrochemical cells to sensors.

Rafael M Cardoso1, Dianderson M H Mendonça1, Weberson P Silva1, Murilo N T Silva1, Edson Nossol1, Rodrigo A B da Silva1, Eduardo M Richter1, Rodrigo A A Muñoz2.   

Abstract

This work presents potential applications of low-cost fused deposition modeling 3D-printers to fabricate multiuse 3D-printed electrochemical cells for flow or batch measurements as well as the 3D-printing of electrochemical sensing platforms. Electrochemical cells and sensors were printed with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and conductive graphene-doped polylactic acid (G-PLA) filaments, respectively. The overall printing operation time and estimated cost per cell were 6 h and $ 6.00, respectively, while the sensors were printed within minutes (16 sensor strips of 1 × 2 cm in 10 min at a cost of $ 1.00 each sensor). The cell performance is demonstrated for the amperometric detection of tert-butylhydroquinone, dipyrone, dopamine and diclofenac by flow-injection analysis (FIA) and batch-injection analysis (BIA) using different working electrodes, including the proposed 3D-printed sensor, which presented comparable electroanalytical performance with other carbon-based electrodes (LOD of 0.1 μmol L-1 for dopamine). Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy of the 3D-printed sensor indicated the presence of graphene nanoribbons within the polymeric matrix. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and heterogeneous electron transfer constants (k0) for the redox probe Ru(NH3)6+3 revealed that a glassy-carbon electrode presented faster electron transfer rates than the 3D-printed sensor; however, the latter presented lower LOD values for dopamine and catechol probably due to oxygenated functional groups at the G-PLA surface.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printer; Flow analysis; Gold CDtrode; Graphene; Screen-printed electrode; Wall-jet cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30172331     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  19 in total

1.  Enhanced Sample Handling for Analytical Ultracentrifugation with 3D-Printed Centerpieces.

Authors:  Samuel C To; Chad A Brautigam; Sumit K Chaturvedi; Mary T Bollard; Jonathan Krynitsky; John W Kakareka; Thomas J Pohida; Huaying Zhao; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Electrochemical determination of several biofuel antioxidants in biodiesel and biokerosene using polylactic acid loaded with carbon black within 3D-printed devices.

Authors:  Nélio I G Inoque; Afonso F João; Lucas V de Faria; Rodrigo A A Muñoz
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.833

3.  3D-printed electrochemical pestle and mortar for identification of falsified pharmaceutical tablets.

Authors:  Ricoveer S Shergill; Anna Farlow; Fernando Perez; Bhavik A Patel
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Prussian blue-modified laser-induced graphene platforms for detection of hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  Tiago A Matias; Lucas V de Faria; Raquel G Rocha; Murillo N T Silva; Edson Nossol; Eduardo M Richter; Rodrigo A A Muñoz
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Affordable equipment to fabricate laser-induced graphene electrodes for portable electrochemical sensing.

Authors:  Waleska R P Costa; Raquel G Rocha; Lucas V de Faria; Tiago A Matias; David L O Ramos; Alessandro G C Dias; Guilherme L Fernandes; Eduardo M Richter; Rodrigo A A Muñoz
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 6.  Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Psychoactive Drugs.

Authors:  Ramin Boroujerdi; Richard Paul
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 7.  Additive manufacturing technology of polymeric materials for customized products: recent developments and future prospective.

Authors:  Akhilesh Kumar Pal; Amar K Mohanty; Manjusri Misra
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  3D Printed SERS-Active Thin-Film Substrates Used to Quantify Levels of the Genotoxic Isothiazolinone.

Authors:  Siddhant Jaitpal; Suhash Reddy Chavva; Samuel Mabbott
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 10.  A 3D Printer Guide for the Development and Application of Electrochemical Cells and Devices.

Authors:  Ana Luisa Silva; Gabriel Maia da Silva Salvador; Sílvia V F Castro; Nakédia M F Carvalho; Rodrigo A A Munoz
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.