Literature DB >> 3533426

Ethanol tolerance in yeasts.

G P Casey, W M Ingledew.   

Abstract

It is now certain that the inherent ethanol tolerance of the Saccharomyces strain used is not the prime factor regulating the level of ethanol that can be produced in a high sugar brewing, wine, sake, or distillery fermentation. In fact, in terms of the maximum concentration that these yeasts can produce under batch (16 to 17% [v/v]) or fed-batch conditions, there is clearly no difference in ethanol tolerance. This is not to say, however, that under defined conditions there is no difference in ethanol tolerance among different Saccharomyces yeasts. This property, although a genetic determinant, is clearly influenced by many factors (carbohydrate level, wort nutrition, temperature, osmotic pressure/water activity, and substrate concentration), and each yeast strain reacts to each factor differently. This will indeed lead to differences in measured tolerance. Thus, it is extremely important that each of these be taken into consideration when determining "tolerance" for a particular set of fermentation conditions. The manner in which each alcohol-related industry has evolved is now known to have played a major role in determining traditional thinking on ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces yeasts. It is interesting to speculate on how different our thinking on ethanol tolerance would be today if sake fermentations had not evolved with successive mashing and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of rice carbohydrate, if distillers' worts were clarified prior to fermentation but brewers' wort were not, and if grape skins with their associated unsaturated lipids had not been an integral part of red wine musts. The time is now ripe for ethanol-related industries to take advantage of these findings to improve the economies of production. In the authors' opinion, breweries could produce higher alcohol beers if oxygenation (leading to unsaturated lipids) and "usable" nitrogen source levels were increased in high gravity worts. White wine fermentations could also, if desired, match the higher ethanol levels in red wines if oxygenation (to provide the unsaturated lipids deleted in part by the removal of the grape skins) were practiced and if care were given to assimilable nitrogen concentrations. This would hold true even at 10 to 14 degrees C, and the more rapid fermentations would maximize utilization of winery tankage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3533426     DOI: 10.3109/10408418609108739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol        ISSN: 1040-841X            Impact factor:   7.624


  63 in total

1.  Fermentation of deproteinized cheese whey powder solutions to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of supplementation with corn steep liquor and repeated-batch operation with biomass recycling by flocculation.

Authors:  Ana Carina Silva; Pedro M R Guimarães; José A Teixeira; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Enhancement of yeast ethanol tolerance by calcium and magnesium.

Authors:  Z Ciesarová; D Smogrovicová; Z Dömény
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 3.  How do yeast cells become tolerant to high ethanol concentrations?

Authors:  Tim Snoek; Kevin J Verstrepen; Karin Voordeckers
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Effect of external pH on ethanol oxidation by Candida utilis.

Authors:  J Páca; J Votruba
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Ethanol-Induced Leakage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetics and Relationship to Yeast Ethanol Tolerance and Alcohol Fermentation Productivity.

Authors:  S P Salgueiro; I Sá-Correia; J M Novais
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Continuous-Culture Responses of Candida shehatae to Shifts in Temperature and Aeration: Implications for Ethanol Inhibition.

Authors:  M A Alexander; T W Chapman; T W Jeffries
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of yeast hulls on stuck and sluggish wine fermentations: importance of the lipid component.

Authors:  E Munoz; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Fuel alcohol production: optimization of temperature for efficient very-high-gravity fermentation.

Authors:  A M Jones; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Ethanol inhibition of Saccharomyces and Candida enzymes.

Authors:  E Martín-Rendón; J Jiménez; T Benítez
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Ethanol production and maximum cell growth are highly correlated with membrane lipid composition during fermentation as determined by lipidomic analysis of 22 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; Michelle Lozada-Contreras; Vladimir Jiranek; Marjorie L Longo; David E Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.