| Literature DB >> 35331275 |
Roshi Sharma1, Yash Pal Sharma1, Sayed Azhar Jawad Hashmi1, Sanjeev Kumar1, Rajesh Kumar Manhas2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) has a rich tradition of usage of wild edible mushrooms (WEMs) for culinary and medicinal purposes. But very few studies, restricted to some regions of the Union Territory, have been conducted to enlist the WEM. District Jammu has never been explored for WEM. Moreover, the quantification of the traditional knowledge of WEM has not been carried out as yet in J&K. Therefore, the present study was conducted in the Jammu district with the aims of enlisting the WEM and its usage, finding the most used WEM, and enumerating the consensus of usage for a species and associated knowledge.Entities:
Keywords: Cultural importance; Ethnomycological; Jammu; Traditional knowledge; Wild edible mushrooms
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35331275 PMCID: PMC8953059 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-022-00521-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Location map of the study area and sampling points ( )
The collection of wild edible mushrooms (WEMs) by informants
| Attributes | Informants | No. of informants | No. of WEM | ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 87 | 4.5a ± 3.2 | 29.67 | < 0.001 |
| Male | 105 | 3.3b ± 2.3 | |||
| Age | Up to 50 years | 93 | 3.3b ± 2.0 | 24.87 | < 0.001 |
| > 50 years | 99 | 4.4a ± 3.5 | |||
| Education | Illiterate | 61 | 5.2a ± 1.5 | 32.14 | < 0.001 |
| 1–8 | 79 | 3.4b ± 1.2 | |||
| 9–12 | 42 | 3.0c ± 1.4 | |||
| > 12 | 10 | 2.9c ± 1.4 | |||
The values of WEM given in the table are mean ± SD. Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was applied as multiple-range test when analysis of variance (ANOVA) was found significant at P < 0.05. Similar alphabets in a column for an attribute show that the values do not vary significantly
Ethnomycology and folk taxonomy of WEM of district Jammu
| Scientific name | Family | Vaucher no | Folk name | Fruiting | Uses (no. of informants cited the fungi for a use) | UR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agaricaceae | HBJU405 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (53); medicine (9); gastrointestinal disorders (6) | 68 | ||
| Auriculariaceae | HBJU442 | Apr–Jun | Culinary (9); medicine (3) | 12 | ||
| Agaricaceae | HBJU407 | Apr–Jun | Culinary (31); medicine (11); gastrointestinal disorders (3) | 45 | ||
| Agaricaceae | HBJU414 | Jan–Jun | Culinary (13; medicine (3) | 16 | ||
| Geastraceae | HBJU446 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (19); medicine (6) | 25 | ||
| Agaricaceae | HBJU415 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (13); medicine (6) | 19 | ||
| Agaricaceae | HBJU418 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (47); medicine (11) | 58 | ||
| Morchellaceae | HBJU404 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (14); medicine (7) | 21 | ||
| Strophariaceae | HBJU422 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (42); medicine (8) | 50 | ||
| Lyophyllaceae | HBJU427 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (72); medicine (10); gastrointestinal disorders (2) | 84 | ||
| Lyophyllaceae | HBJU428 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (49); medicine (11) | 60 | ||
| Lyophyllaceae | HBJU429 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (83); medicine (10) | 93 | ||
| Lyophyllaceae | HBJU432 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (86); medicine (24) | 110 | ||
| Lyophyllaceae | HBJU431 | Jul–Sep | Culinary (65); medicine (10) | 75 |
Fig. 2a–m: a Agaricus californicus Peck, b Auricularia auricula-judae (Bull.) Quel, c Calvatia bovista (L.) Pers., d Coprinellus micaceus (Bull.) Fr., e Geastrum saccatum Fr., f Lepiota procera (Scop.) Gray, g Leucoagaricus rhodocephalus (Berk.) Pegler, h Morchella esculenta (L.) Pers., i Podaxis pistillaris (L.) Fr., j Termitomyces clypeatus R. Heim, k Termitomyces eurrhizus (Berk.) R. Heim, l Termitomyces heimii Natarajan, and m Termitomyces striatus var. annulatus R. Heim
Fig. 3Number of genera and species in various families of fleshy fungi
Fig. 4View points of the informants regarding the lesser number of WEM in the study area
The social belief regarding collection of wild edible mushrooms (WEMs)
| Attributes | Informants | Number | Mean number of WEM collected | ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visits after lightening | Regular visits | |||||
| Gender | Female | 87 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 1.86 | 0.177 ns |
| Male | 105 | 3.5a | 2.8b | 5.71 | 0.019* | |
| Age | Up to 50 years | 93 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 0.08 | 0.781 ns |
| > 50 years | 99 | 4.5a | 3.3b | 5.37 | 0.023* | |
| Education | Illiterate | 61 | 5.5a | 4.0b | 15.99 | < 0.001** |
| Literate | 131 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.72 | 0.101 ns | |
Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was applied as multiple-range test when analysis of variance (ANOVA) was found significant at P < 0.05
Ns non-significant
*,**P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively
Cultural importance index (CI) for WEM of Jammu
| Name of the WEM | CIcul | CImed | CIgas | CItotal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.36 | |
| 0.05 | 0.02 | – | 0.06 | |
| 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.24 | |
| 0.07 | 0.02 | – | 0.08 | |
| 0.10 | 0.03 | – | 0.13 | |
| 0.07 | 0.03 | – | 0.10 | |
| 0.24 | 0.06 | – | 0.30 | |
| 0.07 | 0.04 | – | 0.11 | |
| 0.22 | 0.04 | – | 0.26 | |
| 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.44 | |
| 0.26 | 0.06 | – | 0.31 | |
| 0.43 | 0.05 | – | 0.48 | |
| 0.45 | 0.13 | – | 0.57 | |
| 0.34 | 0.05 | – | 0.39 |
CIcul, CImed, and CIgas is cultural importance index of culinary, medicinal, and gastrointestinal disorders, respectively
Factor informant consensus (Fic) of various use categories for fleshy fungi
| Use category | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Culinary | 596 | 14 | 0.98 |
| Gastrointestinal disease | 12 | 3 | 0.82 |
| Heart disease | 37 | 8 | 0.81 |
| Immunity development | 49 | 11 | 0.79 |
| Skin diseases | 42 | 11 | 0.76 |
nur is number of use reports and nt is the number of taxa