| Literature DB >> 35330286 |
Matevž Likar1, Mateja Grašič1, Blaž Stres2, Marjana Regvar1, Alenka Gaberščik1.
Abstract
Common reed (Phragmites australis) has high biomass production and is primarily subjected to decomposition processes affected by multiple factors. To predict litter decomposition dynamics in intermittent lakes, it is critical to understand how communities of fungi, as the primary decomposers, form under different habitat conditions. This study reports the shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the initial fungal communities on common reed leaves decomposing under different environmental conditions. We demonstrate that a complex network of fungi forms already on the plant persists into the decomposition phase. Phragmites australis leaves contained at least five fungal phyla, with abundant Ascomycota (95.7%) and Basidiomycota (4.1%), identified as saprotrophs (48.6%), pathotrophs (22.5%), and symbiotrophs (12.6%). Most of the correlations between fungi in fresh and decomposing leaves were identified as co-occurrences (positive correlations). The geographic source of litter and leaf age did not affect the structure and diversity of fungal communities. Keystone taxa were mostly moisture-sensitive. Our results suggest that habitat has a strong effect on the formation of the fungal communities through keystone taxa. Nevertheless, it can also alter the proportions of individual fungal groups in the community through indirect effects on competition between the fungal taxa and their exploitation of favourable conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Phragmites australis; community networks; fungal communities; keystone species; litter decomposition; water regime
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330286 PMCID: PMC8951327 DOI: 10.3390/jof8030284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1A nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) ordination for fungal communities from the fresh leaves and Phragmites australis leaves decomposing in dry or wet habitat with accompanying stress value. Legend: Different colours represent the taxonomic classes of the top 20 most abundant taxonomic families included in the analysis. Different shapes represent the individual habitats (dry/wet) and fresh leaves. Table represents p-values of pairwise perMANOVA for fungal communities in the fresh leaves or leaves decomposing in wet or dry habitat. General perMANOVA was significant at p < 0.001.
Diversity and richness indicators for fungal communities from fresh leaves or leaves decomposing in wet or dry habitat (average ± SD, n = 8).
| Observed | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh leaves | 117.0 ± 3.0 | 132.4 ± 11.0 | 2.706 ± 0.08 | 0.876 ± 0.02 |
| Dry habitat | 110.1 ± 6.4 | 122.9 ± 7.0 | 2.521 ± 0.14 | 0.859 ± 0.03 |
| Wet habitat | 85.25 ± 9.3 | 85.25 ± 9.3 | 2.926 ± 0.26 | 0.910 ± 0.04 |
Figure 2Bar charts showing the trophic guilds of fungal communities in fresh leaves and leaves decomposing in wet or dry habitat. Undefined category combines fungal genera without assigned trophic mode.
Figure 3Identification of indicator taxa based on Lefse analysis (LDA scores > 5).
Figure 4Co-occurrence patterns of fungal communities on fresh leaves and leaves decomposing in the dry and wet habitat visualising significant correlations (ρ > 0.6, p < 0.05; indicated with grey lines) between fungal OTUs in leaves of Phragmites australis. Different colours of nodes represent individual modules within the community identified using the greedy optimisation of the modularity algorithm. The size of the nodes represents the abundance of sequences for the individual nodes. The weight of the edges represents the Spearman Rho for the individual edge.
Location-specific network parameters.
| Network Parameter | Fresh Leaves | Dry Habitat | Wet Habitat |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. nodes | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| No. edges | 229 | 187 | 171 |
| Average degree | 15.3 | 12.5 | 11.4 |
| Clustering coefficient | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.87 |
| Network diameter | 4.24 | 4.43 | 4.31 |
| Network centralization | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| Network density | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
| Average path length | 2.25 | 1.96 | 1.55 |