| Literature DB >> 35330221 |
Shahzad Asad1, Muhammad Fayyaz1, Khawar Majeed2, Aziz Ur Rehman3, Sajid Ali4, Jindong Liu5, Awais Rasheed2,5, Yamei Wang6,7.
Abstract
Karnal bunt caused by Tilletia indica is a quarantine disease of wheat causing huge economic losses due to the ban on the import of bunted grains. This study was designed to characterize pathogenicity, aggressiveness and genetic diversity of 68 Tilletia indica isolates collected from different geographic regions of Pakistan. Forty-six isolates were tested for their pathogenicity on eight wheat varieties, out of which three were non-aggressive. The coefficient of infection (CI) ranged from 15.73% (PB-25) to 10% (PB-68, PB-60, and PB-43). The isolates collected from central Punjab showed higher infestation compared to other isolates. Among the wheat varieties used for the aggressiveness study, WL-711 showed susceptible reaction with 10.88% CI, while NIFA-Barsat, HD-29, Janbaz, Bakhtawar-92, Tatara, and AARI 2011 showed resistance to the highly resistant response. These isolates were amplified using 31 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and 32 inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers for diversity analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed greater divergence among isolates collected from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), with a moderate level of admixture. The isolates from Faisalabad (Punjab) were more aggressive compared to isolates from KPK and were clearly separated based on PCA, indicating the significant genetic distance in the populations. Our findings will assist breeders and pathologists in better understanding the pathogenic variability in Tilletia indica and in subsequent disease management.Entities:
Keywords: Karnal bunt; Tilletia indica; bread wheat; fungal disease; genetic variability; virulence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330221 PMCID: PMC8950583 DOI: 10.3390/jof8030219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Isolates of T. indica collected form Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) during 2010–2011 and 2013–2014.
| Isolate Name | Year | Populations | District | Host Cultivar | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KP-1 | 2010–2011 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Peshawar | Unknown | 34.0151 | 71.5249 |
| KP-2 | 2010–2011 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Charsada | Unknown | 34.14943 | 71.74278 |
| KP-5 | 2010–2011 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Mardan | Unknown | 34.1989 | 72.0231 |
| KP-6 | 2010–2011 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Mardan | Unknown | 34.1989 | 72.0231 |
| KPK-11 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Charsada | Fsd-2008 | 34.14943 | 71.74278 |
| KPK-12 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Peshwar | BARS-09 | 34.0151 | 71.5249 |
| KPK-13 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Kohat | Pirshabak | 34.385 | 71.806 |
| KPK-14 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Mardan | Sehr-2008 | 34.1989 | 72.0231 |
| KPK-15 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Charsada | Sehr | 34.14943 | 71.74278 |
| KPK-16 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Charsada | Uqab | 34.14943 | 71.74278 |
| KPK-17 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Mansehra | Bakhar | 34.33126 | 73.198 |
| KPK-18 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Mansehra | Fakhar-e- Sarhad | 34.33126 | 73.198 |
| KPK-19 | 2013–2014 | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Kohat | Glaxay | 34.385 | 71.806 |
| PB-1 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | BARS-2009 | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-12 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Sahiwal | FD-4 | 30.6682 | 73.1114 |
| PB-13 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Sahiwal | Watan | 30.6682 | 73.1114 |
| PB-14 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Sahiwal | INQ-91 | 30.6682 | 73.1114 |
| PB-16 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | Aas-2011 | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-17 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | Sehr-2006 | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-18 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | Unknown | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-2 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Jhelum | Sehr-2006 | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-25 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Faisalabad | Unknown | 31.4504 | 73.135 |
| PB-29 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalpur | Faisalabad-08 | 29.3544 | 71.6911 |
| PB-3 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Pak-81 | 33.7463 | 72.8397 |
| PB-30 | 2010–2011 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalpur | INQ-91 | 29.3544 | 71.6911 |
| PB-4 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Bakhtawar | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-41 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Chakwal-96 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-42 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalpur | Millat-2011 | 29.3544 | 71.6911 |
| PB-43 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalpur | Shahensha | 29.3544 | 71.6911 |
| PB-44 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Sehroz | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-45 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Nayab-81 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-46 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Blue Silver | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-47 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | Koh-e- noor | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-48 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | Lasani | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-49 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Sahiwal | Dharabi | 30.6682 | 73.1114 |
| PB-5 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Taxila | Shehzor-2007 | 33.7463 | 72.8397 |
| PB-50 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | Chakwal-50 | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-51 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | Margala | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-52 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Faisalabad | Fsd-85 | 31.4504 | 73.135 |
| PB-53 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | C-518 | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-54 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Jehlum | C-591 | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-55 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Faisalabad | Pak-81 | 31.4504 | 73.135 |
| PB-56 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Chakwal | Miraj-2008 | 32.9328 | 72.863 |
| PB-59 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | Chakwal-50 | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-60 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | GA-2002 | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-61 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Sehzor-2007 | 33.7463 | 72.8397 |
| PB-62 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Sehr-08 | 33.7463 | 72.8397 |
| PB-63 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Baras-2009 | 33.7463 | 72.8397 |
| PB-64 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Bahawalnagar | Pirsabak | 30.0025 | 73.2412 |
| PB-65 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Jehlum | Unknown | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-66 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Jehlum | Aas | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-67 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Jehlum | Shafaq | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-68 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Jehlum | Chakwal-50 | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-69 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Lahore | Unknown | 31.5204 | 74.3587 |
| PB-7 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Seher-2006 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-70 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Lahore | Pirsabak | 31.5204 | 74.3587 |
| PB-71 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Lahore | Pak-81 | 31.5204 | 74.3587 |
| PB-72 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Lahore | Unknown | 31.5204 | 74.3587 |
| PB-73 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Gujrawala | Sehr-08 | 32.1877 | 74.1945 |
| PB-74 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Gujrawala | Pak-81 | 32.1877 | 74.1945 |
| PB-75 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Gujrawala | Miraj | 32.1877 | 74.1945 |
| PB-76 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Sehzor-2007 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-77 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Uqab-2000 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-78 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Sehr 07 | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-79 | 2013–2014 | Northern_ Punjab | Rawalpindi | Watan | 33.5651 | 73.0169 |
| PB-8 | 2010–2011 | Northern_ Punjab | Jhelum | Pak- 81 | 32.9425 | 73.7257 |
| PB-80 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Faisalabad | Chakora | 31.4504 | 73.135 |
| PB-82 | 2013–2014 | Southern_ Punjab | Faisalabad | Ilasafi | 31.4504 | 73.135 |
Figure 1Geographic map of Pakistan showing sampling sites for Karnal bunt (KB) isolates.
Rating scale used to assess wheat cultivars for Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica).
| Infection | Symptoms | Numerical Value for |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Healthy | 0 |
| 1 * | Inconspicuous point infection (trace) 5% seed bunted | 0.25 * |
| 2 * | Well-developed point infection 25% seed bunted | 0.25 * |
| 3 | Infection spreading along the groove 50% seed bunted | 0.5 |
| 4 | Three-quarters of seed converted to sorus 75% seed bunted | 0.75 |
| 5 | Seed completely converted to sorus | 1.0 |
* Categories combined to calculate Coefficient of Infections for comparison.
The aggressiveness behavior of T. indica on different wheat varieties.
| District | Isolate Code | Population | PI (%) ± SD | CI ± SD * | Reaction Based on CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charsada | KPK-11 | KPK | 15.4 ± 8.12 | 10.77 ± 1.34 | SA |
| KPK-15 | KPK | 14.725 ± 8.32 | 10.65 ± 1.34 | SA | |
| KPK-16 | KPK | 15.6 ± 10.28 | 10.59 ± 1.05 | SA | |
| Kohat | KPK-13 | KPK | 11.53 ± 4.34 | 10.23 ± 0.68 | SA |
| KPK-19 | KPK | 16.53 ± 8.94 | 10.88 ± 1.3 | SA | |
| Mansehra | KPK-17 | KPK | 15.464 ± 9.76 | 10.62 ± 1.14 | SA |
| KPK-18 | KPK | 11.32 ± 3.76 | 10.19 ± 0.55 | SA | |
| Mardan | KPK-14 | KPK | 10.71 ± 2.36 | 10.08 ± 0.3 | SA |
| Peshawar | KPK-12 | KPK | 12.7 ± 5.5 | 10.33 ± 0.68 | SA |
| Chakwal | PB-47 | Northern Punjab | 14.464 ± 6.31 | 10.55 ± 0.8 | SA |
| PB-48 | Northern Punjab | 11.24 ± 6.05 | 10.45 ± 2.2 | SA | |
| PB-50 | Northern Punjab | 12.21 ± 4.07 | 10.31 ± 0.68 | SA | |
| PB-51 | Northern Punjab | 15.24 ± 8.88 | 10.82 ± 1.8 | SA | |
| PB-53 | Northern Punjab | 13.24 ± 5.97 | 10.67 ± 0.94 | SA | |
| PB-56 | Northern Punjab | 13.49 ± 6.99 | 10.48 ± 1.01 | SA | |
| Gujranwala | PB-73 | Northern Punjab | 12.29 ± 7.35 | 10.43 ± 1.54 | SA |
| PB-74 | Northern Punjab | 11.82 ± 3.21 | 10.23 ± 0.45 | SA | |
| PB-75 | Northern Punjab | 14.12 ± 6.64 | 10.62 ± 1.06 | SA | |
| Jehlum | PB-54 | Northern Punjab | 13.89 ± 6.92 | 10.43 ± 0.81 | SA |
| PB-65 | Northern Punjab | 12.49 ± 7.21 | 10.41 ± 1.33 | SA | |
| PB-66 | Northern Punjab | 10.86 ± 2.4 | 10.108 ± 0.32 | SA | |
| PB-67 | Northern Punjab | 13.89 ± 6.96 | 10.78 ± 1.29 | SA | |
| PB-68 | Northern Punjab | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | NA | |
| Lahore | PB-69 | Northern Punjab | 11.071 ± 2.73 | 10.12 ± 0.29 | SA |
| PB-70 | Northern Punjab | 14.34 ± 6.69 | 10.53 ± 0.83 | SA | |
| PB-71 | Northern Punjab | 12.02 ± 4.35 | 10.33 ± 0.78 | SA | |
| PB-72 | Northern Punjab | 13.15 ± 7.05 | 10.45 ± 0.9 | SA | |
| Rawalpindi | PB-41 | Northern Punjab | 10.73 ± 2.46 | 10.31 ± 0.91 | SA |
| PB-44 | Northern Punjab | 11.51 ± 3.55 | 10.17 ± 0.37 | SA | |
| PB-45 | Northern Punjab | 10.708 ± 2.52 | 10.07 ± 0.25 | SA | |
| PB-46 | Northern Punjab | 14.68 ± 8.29 | 10.55 ± 0.95 | SA | |
| PB-61 | Northern Punjab | 11.186 ± 4.66 | 10.3 ± 1.27 | SA | |
| PB-62 | Northern Punjab | 10.39 ± 1.45 | 10.041 ± 0.16 | SA | |
| PB-63 | Northern Punjab | 12.76 ± 6.55 | 10.54 ± 0.99 | SA | |
| PB-76 | Northern Punjab | 13.35 ± 8.18 | 10.43 ± 0.83 | SA | |
| PB-77 | Northern Punjab | 14.53 ± 5.06 | 10.46 ± 0.7 | SA | |
| PB-78 | Northern Punjab | 12.99 ± 3.95 | 10.31 ± 0.68 | SA | |
| PB-79 | Northern Punjab | 11.65 ± 4.37 | 10.31 ± 1.05 | SA | |
| Faisalabad | PB-25 | Northern Punjab | 31.676 ± 9.92 | 15.73 ± 2.47 | MA |
| PB-52 | Northern Punjab | 12.09 ± 3.46 | 10.31 ± 0.55 | SA | |
| PB-55 | Northern Punjab | 17.99 ± 12.75 | 11.37 ± 2.09 | SA | |
| PB-80 | Northern Punjab | 10.45 ± 1.54 | 10.043 ± 0.15 | SA | |
| PB-82 | Northern Punjab | 10.48 ± 1.69 | 10.053 ± 0.2 | SA | |
| Bahawalnagar | PB-59 | Southern Punjab | 12.92 ± 6.91 | 10.32 ± 0.73 | SA |
| PB-60 | Southern Punjab | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | NA | |
| PB-64 | Southern Punjab | 10.29 ± 0.99 | 10.027 ± 0.09 | SA | |
| Bahawalpur | PB-42 | Southern Punjab | 15.011 ± 9.95 | 10.68 ± 1.36 | SA |
| PB-43 | Southern Punjab | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | NA | |
| Sahiwal | PB-49 | Southern Punjab | 13.24 ± 5.53 | 10.43 ± 0.8 | SA |
| LSD (0.01) | 0.625 | 3.54 |
* Transformed data by adding 10. PI = Percent infection (%), CI = Coefficient of infection, MA = moderately aggressive, SA = Slightly aggressive, NA = non-aggressive.
Figure 2Grouping of forty-nine isolates based on coefficient of infection on eight wheat genotypes.
Aggressiveness analysis of T. indica isolates on wheat varieties based on coefficient of infection and percent infection, as expressed against isolates from various wheat growing regions.
| Wheat Variety | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Northern Punjab | Southern Punjab | Overall Mean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI | PI | CI * | PI | CI * | PI | CI * | PI | |
| 2HD-29 | 10.2 | 11.57 | 10.3 | 12.5 | 10.4 | 13.62 | 10.29 b | 12.58 d |
| AARI-2011 | 10.9 | 16.3 | 10.3 | 11.41 | 10.5 | 12.32 | 10.44 b | 12.51 d |
| Bakhtawar-92 | 10.3 | 12.66 | 10.3 | 11.89 | 10.6 | 13.49 | 10.36 b | 12.39 e |
| Fakhre-Sarhad | 10.3 | 13.22 | 10.9 | 14.8 | 10.7 | 14.29 | 10.73 a | 14.40 b |
| Janbaz | 10.2 | 11.47 | 10.3 | 12.9 | 10.4 | 12.74 | 10.32 b | 12.60 d |
| NIFA-Barsat | 10.6 | 14.42 | 10.2 | 11.5 | 10.3 | 12.44 | 10.28 b | 12.25 e |
| Tatara | 10.6 | 14.46 | 10.2 | 12 | 10.6 | 14.23 | 10.39 b | 12.95 c |
| WL-711 | 10.7 | 16.1 | 10.6 | 13.5 | 11.7 | 19.89 | 10.88 a | 15.41 a |
| Mean | 10.5 | 13.77 | 10.4 | 12.56 | 10.6 | 14.13 | 10.5 | 13.14 |
| LSD(0.01) | 0.253 | 0.376 | ||||||
* Transformed data by adding 10. a–e Least significant difference lettering.
Figure 3Variability in Karnal bunt coefficient of infection (A) and percent infection (B) for T. indica isolates sampled from different districts of diverse wheat growing regions of Pakistan.
Characteristics of different RAPD primers in T. indica isolates.
| RAPD Primers | Primer 5′-3′ | Total Bands | Monomorphic Bands | Polymorphic Bands | %Polymorphism | Unique Bands | Product Size Kb | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA-3 | AGTCAGCCAC | 14 | 0 | 14 | 100 | 1(17) | 0.25–2.0 | 0.95 |
| OPA-9 | GGGTAACGCC | 9 | 0 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 0.28–1.5 | 0.95 |
| OPA-13 | CAGCACCCAC | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–1.5 | 0.87 |
| OPA-18 | AGGTGACCGT | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 1(61) | 0.25–2.5 | 0.96 |
| OPA-20 | GTTGCGATCC | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 2(15, 30) | 0.25–2.5 | 0.98 |
| OPAA-1 | AGACGGCTCC | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–1.2 | 0.97 |
| OPAA-16 | GGAACCCACA | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–2.0 | 0.94 |
| RAPD-16 | GTG AGG CGT C | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–2.5 | 0.8 |
| Total | 99 | 0 | 99 | 100 | 4 | 0.25–2.5 | 0.93 |
Values in parentheses of unique bands denotes number of code assigned to the isolates given in Table 1 and Table 2.
Characteristics of different inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers in T. indica isolates.
| Sr. No. | ISSR Primers | Primer 5′-3′ | Total Bands | Monomorphic Bands | Polymorphic Bands | %polymorphism | Unique Bands | Product Size Kb | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 815 | (CT)8G | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100 | 0 | 0.3–3.0 | 0.970 |
| 2 | 812 | (GA)(8)A | 9 | 0 | 9 | 100 | 2(15, 58) | 0.25–1.0 | 0.968 |
| 3 | 808 | (AG)8C | 14 | 0 | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.762 |
| 4 | ISSR-18 | ((CTC)(8)) | 10 | 0 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.973 |
| 5 | 864 | (ATG)6 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 2.6–1.2 | 0.957 |
| 6 | ISSR-1 | (HVH(TG)(7)) | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100 | 1(41) | 0.3–0.8 | 0.909 |
| 7 | 845 | (CT)8RG | 7 | 0 | 7 | 100 | 2(38, 44) | 0.25–1.2 | 0.917 |
| 8 | 885 | BHB(GA)(7) | 7 | 0 | 7 | 100 | 0 | 0.26–1.2 | 0.947 |
| 9 | 847 | (CA)8 A/G C | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100 | 1(46) | 0.25–1.3 | 0.955 |
| 10 | 817 | (CA)8A | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 1(15) | 0.26–2.0 | 0.895 |
| 11 | 876 | (GATA)2(GACA)2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–1.5 | 0.947 |
| 12 | 818 | HBH(AG)7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–1.0 | 0.965 |
| 13 | 890 | VHV(GT)7 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 2.5–1.5 | 0.823 |
| 14 | 835 | (AG)8YC | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0.26–2.0 | 0.899 |
| 15 | 856 | (CA)8 A/G C | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100 | 1(1) | 0.26–1.8 | 0.962 |
| 16 | 857 | (AC)(8)YG | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100 | 0 | 0.25–1.8 | 0.903 |
| 17 | ISSR-17 | (ATG)6) | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100 | 0 | 0.28–2.0 | 0.698 |
| 18 | 810 | (GA)8T | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0.28–1.6 | 0.933 |
| 19 | 826 | (AC)8C | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100 | 0 | 0.28–1.5 | 0.821 |
| 20 | 856-2 | (AC)8YA | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 1(17) | 0.26–2.5 | 0.835 |
| Total | 215 | 0 | 215 | 100 | 9 | 0.25–3.0 | 0.902 |
Values in parentheses of unique bands denote number of codes assigned to the isolates given in Table S3. V = A, C, G; B = G, C, T; H = A, C, T; D = A, G, T; Y = Pyrimidine (C, T); R = Purine (A, G).
Summary of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on RAPD and ISSR of T. indica isolates.
| Marker | Source of Variance | df | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | Variance Components | Percentage of Variation | Fst | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPD | Among the population | 1 | 51.21 | 51.21 | 1.53 | 7.76 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Within the isolates | 53 | 944.72 | 17.82 | 17.82 | 90.44 | 0.03 | ||
| Total | 67 | 1248.69 | 18.64 | 19.71 | 100 | |||
| ISSR | Among the population | 1 | 107.021 | 107.02 | 3.14 | 7.40 | 0.074 | 0.01 |
| Within the isolates | 53 | 2049.5 | 38.66 | 38.66 | 91.0 | 0.02 | ||
| Total | 67 | 2696.75 | 40.25 | 42.451 | 100 |
Significant at p = 0.05.
Figure 4Distribution of T. indica isolates revealed by principal component analysis (PCA) based on (A) RAPD and (B) ISSR.
Figure 5Dendrogram constructed by using UPGMA based on the Euclidean coefficient of combined RAPD–ISSR for 68 T. indica isolates.
Summary statistic of mean genetic parameters based on RAPD and ISSR analysis of T. indica isolates.
| Marker | Pop | N | MLG | eMLG | SE | H | G | Lambda | E.5 | Hexp | Ia | rbarD | p.rD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPD | KPK | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 13 | 0.923 | 1 | 0.204 | 5.2 | 0.0452 | 0.001 |
| Punjab | 55 | 55 | 13 | 2.12 × 10−6 | 4.01 | 55 | 0.982 | 1 | 0.2 | 5.32 | 0.0347 | 0.001 | |
| Total | 68 | 68 | 13 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 68 | 0.985 | 1 | 0.206 | 5.22 | 0.0321 | 0.001 | |
| ISSR | KPK | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 13 | 0.923 | 1 | 0.242 | 3.83 | 0.0149 | 0.001 |
| Punjab | 55 | 55 | 13 | 2.12 × 10−6 | 4.01 | 55 | 0.982 | 1 | 0.209 | 5.59 | 0.0179 | 0.001 | |
| Total | 68 | 68 | 13 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 68 | 0.985 | 1 | 0.221 | 5.69 | 0.0175 | 0.001 |
Notes: Pop = A vector indicating the population factor, N = an integer vector indicating the number of individuals/isolates in the specified population; MLG = an integer vector indicating the number of multilocus genotypes found in the specified population; eMLG = the expected number of MLG at the lowest common sample size (set by the parameter minsamp); SE = the standard error for the rarefaction analysis; H = Shannon–Wiener Diversity index; G = Stoddard and Taylor’s Index; Lambda = Simpson’s index; E.5 = Evenness; Hexp = Nei’s gene diversity (expected heterozygosity); Ia = a numeric vector giving the value of the Index of Association for each population factor;, (see ia); rbarD = a numeric vector giving the value of the Standardized Index of Association for each population factor; (see ia); p.rD = p-value for r d.
Figure 6Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis using Bruvo’s distance illustrating the relationships and the relative frequency of each isolates. Circle colors represent the population of T. indica isolates based on (A) RAPD, (B) ISSR.
Comparison of RAPD and ISSR marker in evaluating genetic diversity of T. indica isolates.
| Parameters | RAPD | ISSR |
|---|---|---|
| Number of assay(Primer) units | 8 | 20 |
| Number of total bands | 99 | 215 |
| Number of monomophic bands | 0 | 0 |
| Number of polymorphic bands | 99 | 215 |
| Percent polymorphism | 100 | 100 |
| Total number of unique bands | 4 | 9 |
| Size of PCR products | 0.25–2.5 kb | 0.25–3.0 kb |
| Fraction of polymorphic Marker(β) | 1 | 1 |
| Average PIC | 0.92 | 0.90 |
| Multiplex ratio (n) | 1.547 | 0.537 |
| Effective Multiplex ratio (E = βxn) | 1.547 | 0.537 |
| Marker Index (MI = Ex PIC) | 1.43 | 0.482 |