| Literature DB >> 35329745 |
Shaochun Lv1, Tianyu Qu2, Hisham Al-Ward3, Liting Mu4, Hongbin Qiu5, Yunlong Zhang6.
Abstract
Bone defects occurring for various reasons can lead to deformities and dysfunctions of the human body. Considering the need for clinical applications, it is essential for bone regeneration to exploit a scaffold with bioactive bone cement. In this study, we fabricated bioactive magnesium phosphate bone cement (BMPC) at room temperature; then, it was set at to °C and 100% humidity for 2 h. The process was as follows: Simulating a clinical environment, magnesium oxide (MgO) was formed by calcining basic magnesium carbonate (Mg2(OH)2CO3). MgO, potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) and carboxymethyl chitosan (C20H37N3O14, CMC) were mixed to form magnesium phosphate bone cement (MPC); then, monocalcium phosphate (Ca(H2PO4)2) was added to neutralize the alkaline product after MPC hydration to fabricate bioactive magnesium phosphate bone cement (BMPC). The influence of the doped content of Ca(H2PO4)2 on the properties of bone cement was discussed. The results showed that Ca(H2PO4)2 and CMC can adjust the setting time of bone cement to between 8 and 25 min. The compressive strength increased first and then decreased. After 48 h without additional pressure, the compressive strength reached the maximum value, which was about 38.6 MPa. Ca(H2PO4)2 and CMC can play a synergistic role in regulating the properties of BMPC. The BMPC was degradable in the simulated body fluid (SBF). The results of the cytotoxicity experiment and laser confocal microscopy experiment indicated that BMPC fabricated at room temperature had better biocompatibility and degradability, which was more consistent with clinical operation requirements. BMPC is a promising orthopedic material and is suitable for repairing bone defects.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive bone cement; bone defects; magnesium phosphate; monocalcium phosphate; orthopedic materials
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329745 PMCID: PMC8953577 DOI: 10.3390/ma15062293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Relative growth rate (RGR) and cytotoxicity grade standard.
| RGR (%) | Toxicity Grade |
|---|---|
| ≥100 | 0 Grade |
| 75~99 | 1 Grade |
| 50~74 | 2 Grade |
| 25~49 | 3 Grade |
| 1~24 | 4 Grade |
| 0 | 5 Grade |
Figure 1The hydration products and pH of MPC specimens. (a) 1:2; (b) 1:3; (c) 1:4; (d) 1:5.
Figure 2SEM images of BMPC samples. (a,b) BMPC0; (c,d) BMPC20; (e,f) BMPC40; (g,h) BMPC60.
Figure 3pH of BMPC extracts with Ca(H2PO4)2.
Figure 4The setting time of BMPC specimens with Ca(H2PO4)2.
The hydration products of BMPC after setting for 48 h and soaking for 28 d tested by XRD.
| BMPC0 | BMPC20 | BMPC40 | BMPC60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting for 48 h | ①② | ①②③④⑤⑥ | ③④⑤⑥⑦ | ③⑤⑥⑦ |
| Soaking for 28 d | ➊➍➎ | ➊➋➌➏➐➑ | ➊➌➏➑ | ➊➌➏➑ |
Setting for 48 h: ① MgO; ② MgKPO4; ③ Mg3(PO4)2; ④ Ca3(PO4)2; ⑤ MgHPO4; ⑥ Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2; ⑦ MgKH(PO4)2. Soaking for 28 d: ➊ Mg3(PO4)2; ➋ KMgPO4; ➌ MgHPO4; ➍ Mg2P2O7; ➎ K4P2O7; ➏ K2CaP2O7; ➐ Ca3(PO4)2; ➑ Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2.
Figure 5The compressive strength of BMPC specimens with Ca(H2PO4)2.
Figure 6The degradation rate of BMPC samples with Ca(H2PO4)2.
The relative growth rate (RGB) and toxicity grade (TG) of BMPC samples.
| Group | 1 d | 3 d | 5 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGB (%) | TG | RGB (%) | TG | RGB (%) | TG | |
| BMPC0 | 81.75 | 1 | 75.68 | 1 | 76.08 | 1 |
| BMPC20 | 89.68 | 1 | 84.93 | 1 | 83.95 | 1 |
| BMPC40 | 103.97 | 0 | 108.90 | 0 | 103.12 | 0 |
| BMPC60 | 107.14 | 0 | 113.01 | 0 | 107.58 | 0 |
Figure 7The cytotoxicity of BMPC samples.
Figure 8Images of the laser confocal microscopy experiment of BMPC samples. (a) BMPC0; (b) BMPC2; (c) BMPC40; (d) BMPC60.