Literature DB >> 27838464

Critical review: Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements.

R O'Neill1, H O McCarthy2, E B Montufar3, M-P Ginebra3, D I Wilson4, A Lennon1, N Dunne5.   

Abstract

Calcium phosphate cements (CPC) have seen clinical success in many dental and orthopaedic applications in recent years. The properties of CPC essential for clinical success are reviewed in this article, which includes properties of the set cement (e.g. bioresorbability, biocompatibility, porosity and mechanical properties) and unset cement (e.g. setting time, cohesion, flow properties and ease of delivery to the surgical site). Emphasis is on the delivery of calcium phosphate (CaP) pastes and CPC, in particular the occurrence of separation of the liquid and solid components of the pastes and cements during injection; and established methods to reduce this phase separation. In addition a review of phase separation mechanisms observed during the extrusion of other biphasic paste systems and the theoretical models used to describe these mechanisms are discussed. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Occurrence of phase separation of calcium phosphate pastes and cements during injection limits their full exploitation as a bone substitute in minimally invasive surgical applications. Due to lack of theoretical understanding of the phase separation mechanism(s), optimisation of an injectable CPC that satisfies clinical requirements has proven difficult. However, phase separation of pastes during delivery has been the focus across several research fields. Therefore in addition to a review of methods to reduce phase separation of CPC and the associated constraints, a review of phase separation mechanisms observed during extrusion of other pastes and the theoretical models used to describe these mechanisms is presented. It is anticipated this review will benefit future attempts to develop injectable calcium phosphate based systems. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cements; Calcium phosphates; Injectability; Material properties; Phase separation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838464     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  23 in total

1.  Calcium-Enriched Nanofibrillated Cellulose/Poloxamer in-situ Forming Hydrogel Scaffolds as a Controlled Delivery System of Raloxifene HCl for Bone Engineering.

Authors:  Rabab Kamel; Nahla A El-Wakil; Nermeen A Elkasabgy
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-10-05

2.  A Novel Calcium Phosphate-Based Nanocomposite for Augmentation of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Chun Liu; Huiling Liu; Haoyong Fu; Chunde Li; Lei Yang; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  Gold nanoparticles in injectable calcium phosphate cement enhance osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Huimin Chen; Feimin Zhang; Chongyun Bao; Michael D Weir; Mark A Reynolds; Junqing Ma; Ning Gu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 4.  Translational Applications of Hydrogels.

Authors:  Santiago Correa; Abigail K Grosskopf; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Doreen Chan; Anthony C Yu; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Eric A Appel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties.

Authors:  Hockin Hk Xu; Ping Wang; Lin Wang; Chongyun Bao; Qianming Chen; Michael D Weir; Laurence C Chow; Liang Zhao; Xuedong Zhou; Mark A Reynolds
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 13.567

6.  In vitro ion adsorption and cytocompatibility of dicalcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  Martha Schamel; Jake E Barralet; Jürgen Groll; Uwe Gbureck
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Thermoresponsive Methylcellulose/Calcium Phosphate-Based Injectable Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Öznur Demir Oğuz; Duygu Ege
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Bioceramics and bone healing.

Authors:  Maria-Pau Ginebra; Montserrat Espanol; Yassine Maazouz; Victor Bergez; David Pastorino
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

9.  Effect of the Addition of Alginate and/or Tetracycline on Brushite Cement Properties.

Authors:  Claudia Morilla; Elianis Perdomo; Ana Karla Hernández; Ramcy Regalado; Amisel Almirall; Gastón Fuentes; Yaima Campos Mora; Timo Schomann; Alan Chan; Luis J Cruz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.