| Literature DB >> 35329407 |
Abdullah Almalki1, Julie Toby Thomas2, Abdul Rehman Ahmed Khan1, Basim Almulhim3, Abdullah Alassaf3, Sara Ayid Alghamdi3, Betsy Joseph4, Ali Alqerban5,6, Saud Alotaibi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The relevance of growth determination in orthodontics is driving the search for the most precise and least invasive way of tracking the pubertal growth spurt. Our aim was to explore whether minimally invasive salivary estimation of biomarkers Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) could be used to estimate skeletal maturity for clinical convenience, especially in children and adolescent age groups. MATERIALS ANDEntities:
Keywords: hand wrist radiographs; insulin-like growth factor; insulin-like growth factor binding protein; orthodontics; salivary diagnostics; skeletal maturity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329407 PMCID: PMC8953114 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The hand-wrist radiographs depict different skeletal maturity stages.
Frequency and percentage distribution of patients based on gender and various study parameters.
| Variable | Class | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Less than 14 | 7 (20.6) | 21 (37.5) | 28 (31.1) |
| 14 to 20 | 13 (38.2) | 22 (39.3) | 35 (38.9) | |
| Greater than 20 | 14 (41.2) | 13 (23.2) | 27 (30.0) | |
| Location | Urban | 9 (26.5) | 21 (37.5) | 30 (33.3) |
| Rural | 25 (73.5) | 35 (62.5) | 60 (66.7) | |
| Family history of periodontal disease | Yes | 6 (17.6) | 11 (19.6) | 17 (18.9) |
| No | 28 (82.4) | 45 (80.4) | 73 (81.1) | |
| Frequency of brushing | Once | 22 (64.7) | 31 (55.4) | 53 (58.9) |
| Twice | 7 (20.6) | 25 (44.6) | 32 (35.6) | |
| Never or occ | 5 (14.7) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (5.5) | |
| Previous dental visits | Once a year | 9 (26.5) | 25 (44.6) | 34 (37.8) |
| Twice a year | 5 (14.7) | 15 (26.8) | 20 (22.2) | |
| Occasionally | 12 (35.3) | 12 (21.4) | 24 (26.7) | |
| Never | 8 (23.5) | 4 (7.2) | 12 (13.3) | |
| Simplified oral hygiene index | Good | 18 (52.9) | 34 (60.7) | 52 (57.8) |
| Fair | 11 (32.4) | 19 (33.9) | 30 (33.3) | |
| Poor | 5 (14.7) | 3 (5.4) | 8 (8.9) | |
| Bleeding on probing % of sites | No BOP | 15 (44.1) | 32 (57.1) | 47 (52.2) |
| <10% | 4 (11.8) | 6 (10.7) | 10 (11.1) | |
| 10–30% | 5 (14.7) | 9 (16.1) | 14 (15.6) | |
| >30% | 10 (29.4) | 9 (16.1) | 19 (21.1) | |
| Probing pocket depth | Normal | 26 (76.5) | 46 (82.1) | 72 (80.0) |
| 4–5 mm | 8 (73.5) | 8 (14.3) | 16 (17.8) | |
| >5 mm | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.6) | 2 (2.2) | |
| Community periodontal index | 0 | 15 (44.1) | 31 (55.4) | 46 (51.1) |
| 1 | 6 (17.6) | 6 (10.7) | 12 (13.3) | |
| 2 | 9 (26.5) | 12 (21.4) | 21 (23.3) | |
| 3 | 4 (11.8) | 5 (8.9) | 9 (10.0) | |
| 4 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.6) | 2 (2.3) | |
| Clinical attachment loss | No CAL | 29 (85.3) | 49 (87.4) | 78 (86.7) |
| 1–2 mm | 5 (14.7) | 2 (3.6) | 7 (7.8) | |
| 3–4 mm | 0 (0.0) | 3 (5.4) | 3 (3.3) | |
| 5 mm and more | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.6) | 2 (2.2) |
Comparison of skeletal stages as determined by the hand-wrist radiograph based on IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in male and female patients (Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test).
| Stages | IGF-1 | IGFBP-3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | MW ( | Male | Female | MW ( | |
| 1 | 0.93 (1.68) a | 0.57 (2.48) a | 0.156 NS | 3.74 (0.34) a | 3.23 (1.86) a | 0.001 ** |
| 2 | 2.52 (0.38) a | 0.87 (1.24) abc | 0.033 * | 3.96 (0.43) ab | 3.31 (2.07) a | 0.155 NS |
| 3 | 2.58 (1.10) a | 2.22 (1.50) b | 0.770 NS | 4.29 (0.21) b | 4.31 (0.83) b | 0.767 NS |
| 4 | 1.67 (2.48) a | 2.32 (1.80) bc | 0.518 NS | 3.60 (0.85) a | 4.06 (1.57) ab | 0.253 NS |
| 5 | 1.09 (1.75) a | 1.47 (1.75) c | 0.503 NS | 4.25 (0.70) b | 3.36 (2.13) a | 0.000 ** |
| (KW) | 0.231 NS | 0.004 ** | 0.007 ** | 0.003 ** | ||
(KW: Kruskal–Wallis test, MW: Mann–Whitney test) * denotes statistically significant result, **: significant at 1% level (p < 0.01), NS: not significant (p > 0.05), Data are represented as median (range). medians with different superscripted alphabets shows pairwise significance of stages by Mann–Whitney test. IGF-1: insulin growth factor-1, IGFBP-3: insulin growth factor binding protein-3. a, b and c are alphabets used to denote pairwise comparison. When a common superscripted alphabet occurs at two different group for medians, then it means these groups do not differ significantly.
Figure 2Scatter diagram showing the correlation between IGF/IGFBP3 and different stages of skeletal development as assessed by the hand-wrist radiograph.