| Literature DB >> 35329324 |
Chiaki Tsutsumi-Arai1, Yoko Iwamiya2, Reiko Hoshino3, Chika Terada-Ito1, Shunsuke Sejima4, Kazuhiro Akutsu-Suyama5, Mitsuhiro Shibayama5, Zenji Hiroi6, Reiko Tokuyama-Toda1, Ryugo Iwamiya2, Kouhei Ijichi1, Toshie Chiba7, Kazuhito Satomura1.
Abstract
Masks are effective for preventing the spread of COVID-19 and other respiratory infections. If antimicrobial properties can be applied to the non-woven fabric filters in masks, they can become a more effective countermeasure against human-to-human and environmental infections. We investigated the possibilities of carrying antimicrobial agents on the fiber surfaces of non-woven fabric filters by applying silica-resin coating technology, which can form silica-resin layers on such fabrics at normal temperature and pressure. Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis showed that a silica-resin layer was formed on the fiber surface of non-woven fabric filters. Bioassays for coronavirus and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) revealed that all antimicrobial agents tested loaded successfully onto non-woven fabric filters without losing their inactivation effects against the human coronavirus (inhibition efficacy: >99.999%). These results indicate that this technology could be used to load a functional substance onto a non-woven fabric filter by vitrifying its surface. Silica-resin coating technology also has the potential of becoming an important breakthrough not only in the prevention of infection but also in various fields, such as prevention of building aging, protection of various cultural properties, the realization of a plastic-free society, and prevention of environmental pollution.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antiviral activity; mask; non-woven fabric; silica-resin coating technology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329324 PMCID: PMC8952221 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Antimicrobial agents for processing of non-woven fabric filter.
| Antimicrobial Agents | Amount (g) | pH | Thickness (mm) | Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cetylpyridinium chloride | 2.0 | 6 | 0.19 | 0.97 |
| Grapefruit seed extract | 2.0 | 6 | 0.18 | 0.99 |
| Chlorhexidine gluconate (20%) | 3.0 | 6 | 0.15 | 1.06 |
| Benzalkonium chloride (10%) | 16.0 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.01 |
| Povidone iodine (10%) | 10.0 | 5.5 | 0.18 | 0.90 |
| Hinokitiol (2%) | 25.0 | 6 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
To prepare each working solution, 100 g of basal solution was added to the indicated amount of antimicrobial agent, and a non-woven fabric filter (15 cm × 15 cm, ~0.10 mm in thickness, 0.56 g) was dipped into each working solution. pH: each operating solution’s pH value; thickness: post-processing thickness; weight: post-processing weight.
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the fiber surfaces of non-woven fabric filters treated with CPC (A), GSE (B), CHX (C), BZC (D), PI (E), or HKL (F). Amorphous structures (*) were observed among fibers in certain areas of non-woven fabric filters treated with CPC (A), GSE (B), CHX (C), BZC (D), and PI (E), but not with HKL (F) and (G) control.
Figure 2Elemental mapping of the fiber surfaces of non-woven fabric filters treated with CPC (A), GSE (B), CHX (C), BZC (D), PI (E), or HKL (F). The presence of Si on the fibers of non-woven fabric filters was confirmed in (A–F), but not in (G) (Control).
Figure 3Elemental mapping of the fiber surfaces of non-woven fabric filters treated with CPC (A), GSE (B), CHX (C), BZC (D), PI (E), or HKL (F). The presence of O on the fibers of non-woven fabric filters was confirmed in (A–F), but not in (G) (Control).
Figure 4Air permeability of masks before/after silica-resin coating technology treatment.
Antiviral efficacy of non-woven fabric filters treated with silica-resin coating technology and antimicrobial agents.
| Antimicrobial Agent | Amount (g) | Ct Value | Calculated TCID50 (/mL) | Inhibition Efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) | 2.0 | ND | <2.5 × 100 | >99.9994 |
| Grapefruit seed extract (GSE) | 2.0 | ND | <2.5 × 100 | >99.9994 |
| 20% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) | 3.0 | 45.2 | 2.5 × 100 | 99.9994 |
| 10% Benzalkonium chloride (BZC) | 16.0 | ND | <2.5 × 100 | >99.9994 |
| 10% Povidone iodine (PI) | 10.0 | 40.4 | 4.5 × 101 | 99.9998 |
| 2% Hinokitiol (HKL) | 25.0 | 47.8 | <2.5 × 100 | >99.9994 |
| Control (non-woven fabric filter w/o any treatment) | N/A | 23.9 | 7.5 × 105 | N/A |
| Control (non-woven fabric filter treated by silica-resin coating technology without any antimicrobial agent) | N/A | 24.5 | <4.5 × 105 | N/A |