| Literature DB >> 35328997 |
Michael Belingheri1, Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu2, Stefano Renzetti3, Deepika Bhasin4, Chi Wen2, Donatella Placidi3, Manuela Oppini3, Loredana Covolo3, Alessandro Padovani5, Roberto G Lucchini3,6.
Abstract
Environmental exposures to agrochemicals and nutritional factors may be associated with Parkinson's Disease (PD). None of the studies to date has examined the combined effects of diet and agricultural chemical exposure together. To address these research gaps, we aimed to assess the association of nutritional factors and agrochemical exposure with the risk of PD. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate the association of nutritional and agrochemical exposures with PD, adjusting for gender, age, socio-economic status, head injury, family history, smoking, metals exposure, and α-synuclein gene polymorphism. Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression was applied to examine the effect of dietary components as a mixture. We recruited 347 cases and 389 controls. Parent history of PD (OR = 4.15, 95%CI: 2.10, 8.20), metals exposure (OR = 2.50, 95%CI: 1.61-3.89), SNCA rs356219 polymorphism (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.04-1.87 for TC vs. TT; OR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.43-3.28 for CC vs. TT), agrochemical exposures (OR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.41-3.16), and being born in the Brescia province (OR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.17-2.90) were significantly associated with PD. Conversely, fish intake and coffee consumption had a protective effect. The study confirmed the role of environmental exposures in the genesis of PD. Fish intake and coffee consumption are protective factors even when agricultural chemical exposures exist. Genetic factors and metals exposure were confirmed as risk factors for PD.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s Disease; SNCA polymorphism; agricultural chemical exposure; metals exposure; nutritional factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328997 PMCID: PMC8954923 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics distribution of the overall population and divided by participants with and without PD. p-value of t-test and chi-squared test were included to test the difference between No PD and PD groups for continuous and categorical variables.
| No PD ( | PD ( | Total ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 69.5 (9.7) | 71.9 (9.6) | 70.6 (9.7) | |
|
| 0.754 | |||
| Female | 158 (40.6%) | 137 (39.5%) | 295 (40.1%) | |
| Male | 231 (59.4%) | 210 (60.5%) | 441 (59.9%) | |
|
| 0.792 | |||
| Low | 254 (65.3%) | 232 (66.9%) | 486 (66.0%) | |
| Medium | 83 (21.3%) | 67 (19.3%) | 150 (20.4%) | |
| High | 52 (13.4%) | 48 (13.8%) | 100 (13.6%) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| No | 381 (97.9%) | 322 (92.8%) | 703 (95.5%) | |
| Yes | 8 (2.1%) | 25 (7.2%) | 33 (4.5%) | |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| No | 342 (87.9%) | 275 (79.3%) | 617 (83.8%) | |
| Yes | 47 (12.1%) | 72 (20.7%) | 119 (16.2%) | |
|
| 0.490 | |||
| No | 340 (87.4%) | 309 (89.0%) | 649 (88.2%) | |
| Yes | 49 (12.6%) | 38 (11.0%) | 87 (11.8%) | |
|
| 0.153 | |||
| No | 214 (55.0%) | 209 (60.2%) | 423 (57.5%) | |
| Yes | 175 (45.0%) | 138 (39.8%) | 313 (42.5%) | |
|
| 0.011 | |||
| Brescia | 329 (84.6%) | 315 (90.8%) | 644 (87.5%) | |
| Other | 60 (15.4%) | 32 (9.2%) | 92 (12.5%) | |
|
| 0.006 | |||
| No | 354 (93.7%) | 301 (87.8%) | 655 (90.8%) | |
| Yes | 24 (6.3%) | 42 (12.2%) | 66 (9.2%) | |
|
| 0.004 | |||
| TT | 167 (43.9%) | 113 (34.1%) | 280 (39.4%) | |
| TC | 167 (43.9%) | 153 (46.2%) | 320 (45.0%) | |
| CC | 46 (12.1%) | 65 (19.6%) | 111 (15.6%) | |
|
| 0.067 | |||
| Low | 152 (39.1%) | 164 (47.3%) | 316 (42.9%) | |
| Medium | 191 (49.1%) | 143 (41.2%) | 334 (45.4%) | |
| High | 46 (11.8%) | 40 (11.5%) | 86 (11.7%) | |
|
| 0.041 | |||
| Low | 114 (29.3%) | 102 (29.4%) | 216 (29.3%) | |
| Medium-Low | 106 (27.2%) | 82 (23.6%) | 188 (25.5%) | |
| Medium-High | 129 (33.2%) | 103 (29.7%) | 232 (31.5%) | |
| High | 40 (10.3%) | 60 (17.3%) | 100 (13.6%) | |
|
| 0.139 | |||
| Low | 339 (87.1%) | 289 (83.3%) | 628 (85.3%) | |
| High | 50 (12.9%) | 58 (16.7%) | 108 (14.7%) | |
|
| 0.002 | |||
| Low | 80 (20.6%) | 99 (28.5%) | 179 (24.3%) | |
| Medium-Low | 94 (24.2%) | 102 (29.4%) | 196 (26.6%) | |
| Medium-High | 106 (27.2%) | 81 (23.3%) | 187 (25.4%) | |
| High | 109 (28.0%) | 65 (18.7%) | 174 (23.6%) | |
|
| 0.336 | |||
| Low | 151 (38.8%) | 120 (34.6%) | 271 (36.8%) | |
| Medium | 208 (53.5%) | 192 (55.3%) | 400 (54.3%) | |
| High | 30 (7.7%) | 35 (10.1%) | 65 (8.8%) | |
|
| 0.367 | |||
| Low | 349 (89.7%) | 304 (87.6%) | 653 (88.7%) | |
| High | 40 (10.3%) | 43 (12.4%) | 83 (11.3%) | |
|
| 0.521 | |||
| Low | 121 (31.1%) | 106 (30.5%) | 227 (30.8%) | |
| Medium | 201 (51.7%) | 170 (49.0%) | 371 (50.4%) | |
| High | 67 (17.2%) | 71 (20.5%) | 138 (18.8%) | |
|
| 0.264 | |||
| Low | 114 (29.3%) | 83 (23.9%) | 197 (26.8%) | |
| Medium-Low | 104 (26.7%) | 91 (26.2%) | 195 (26.5%) | |
| Medium-High | 116 (29.8%) | 124 (35.7%) | 240 (32.6%) | |
| High | 55 (14.1%) | 49 (14.1%) | 104 (14.1%) |
Logistic regression results demonstrating the odds ratios (OR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and p-values for the association between environmental, genetic, and dietary predictors and PD.
| Model 1 | Model 2 a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | ||
| Age | 1.03 | 1.01–1.05 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 1.01–1.05 | <0.001 |
| Male | 0.98 | 0.69–1.40 | 0.929 | 0.99 | 0.69–1.41 | 0.947 |
| SES Medium vs. Low | 1.12 | 0.74–1.71 | 0.586 | 1.12 | 0.74–1.71 | 0.596 |
| SES High vs. Low | 1.14 | 0.70–1.86 | 0.603 | 1.11 | 0.68–1.81 | 0.674 |
| Parental PD history | 3.58 | 1.58–8.94 | 0.004 | 3.64 | 1.59–9.16 | 0.003 |
| Head Injury | 0.88 | 0.52–1.46 | 0.611 | 0.88 | 0.53–1.47 | 0.63 |
| Ever smoked | 0.81 | 0.57–1.15 | 0.234 | 0.81 | 0.57–1.14 | 0.228 |
| SNCA rs356219 (TC vs. TT) | 1.32 | 0.93–1.87 | 0.125 | 1.32 | 0.93–1.87 | 0.124 |
| SNCA rs356219 (CC vs. TT) | 2.1 | 1.30–3.43 | 0.003 | 2.09 | 1.29–3.41 | 0.003 |
| Agricultural chemical exposure | 1.98 | 1.28–3.10 | 0.003 | 1.95 | 1.25–3.05 | 0.003 |
| Metal exposure (Yes vs. No) | 2.34 | 1.31–4.27 | 0.004 | 2.33 | 1.30–4.25 | 0.005 |
| Coffee | 1 | 0.99–1.00 | 0.109 | 1 | 0.99–1.00 | 0.105 |
| Fish | 0.98 | 0.96–1.00 | 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.96–1.00 | 0.066 |
| Fruit | 1.27 | 1.02–1.59 | 0.036 | 0.94 | 0.58–1.49 | 0.807 |
| Vegetables | 1.01 | 1.00–1.02 | 0.018 | 1.32 | 0.81–2.16 | 0.268 |
| White meat | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | 0.432 | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | 0.432 |
| Red meat | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 | 0.315 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 | 0.291 |
| Dairy | 1 | 0.99–1.01 | 0.849 | 1 | 0.99–1.01 | 0.838 |
| Carbs | 1 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.586 | 1 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.579 |
| Born in Brescia (BS) | 1.73 | 1.05–2.90 | 0.035 | 1.69 | 1.02–2.84 | 0.043 |
| (Fruit and BS) vs. Other | 1.31 | 0.81–2.21 | 0.286 | |||
| (Vegetables and BS) vs. Other | 0.93 | 0.55–1.55 | 0.773 | |||
a Model 2 additionally includes the interaction terms between fruit and vegetable consumptions with place of birth (Brescia vs. other).
Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression examining the relationships of diet mixture and environmental and genetic factors with PD. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown.
| Model | Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | |
| WQS index for diet mixture b | 1.305 | (0.88, 1.936) | 0.721 | (0.525, 0.991) |
| Age | 1.034 | (1.019, 1.049) | 1.031 | (1.016, 1.046) |
| Males vs. Females | 0.98 | (0.764, 1.258) | 0.979 | (0.757, 1.265) |
| SES Medium vs. Low | 1.135 | (0.774, 1.663) | 1.138 | (0.776, 1.669) |
| SES High vs. Low | 1.13 | (0.766, 1.668) | 1.182 | (0.795, 1.758) |
| Parent PD history | 4.165 | (2.136, 8.12) | 4.145 | (2.096, 8.196) |
| Head Injury | 0.883 | (0.58, 1.344) | 0.881 | (0.578, 1.343) |
| Ever smoked | 0.767 | (0.565, 1.041) | 0.759 | (0.559, 1.031) |
| Agricultural chemical exposure | 1.843 | (1.173, 2.897) | 2.113 | (1.413, 3.159) |
| Metal exposure | 2.501 | (1.607, 3.893) | 2.504 | (1.610, 3.893) |
| Born in Brescia vs. others | 1.843 | (1.173, 2.897) | 1.825 | (1.169, 2.848) |
| SNCA rs356219 | ||||
| TC vs. TT | 1.396 | (1.036, 1.88) | 1.393 | (1.037, 1.871) |
| CC vs. TT | 2.138 | (1.417, 3.225) | 2.17 | (1.434, 3.284) |
a This table demonstrates the results from the WQS regressions constraining the direction of the diet mixture on PD as either positive (Model P) or negative (Model N). The WQS index for diet mixture was only significant when the mixture effect direction was constraining to negative (Model N). The dietary components included in the WQS mixture are coffee, fish, white meat, red meat, dairy, carbs, fruit, and vegetables. b The estimated weights of each of the dietary components in the WQS index are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1Boxplots of the weights estimated through the Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression representing the distribution generated by the 100 repeated holdout validations for each element considered in the mixture. The set of weights are those associated with the nutrient mixture index with a protective effect on PD. The diamond corresponds to the weight mean value for each nutrient. The red dashed line is the prespecified threshold (equal to the inverse of the number of elements in the mixture: 1/8) to establish the weights different from 0.