| Literature DB >> 35328879 |
Kuniko Arita1,2, Akira Shibanuma1, Rogie Royce Carandang1, Masamine Jimba1.
Abstract
Migrant workers are at a greater risk of having low mental well-being compared to their local counterparts. The Japanese government accepts migrants through its Technical Intern Training programs, but the factors associated with their mental well-being remain unclear. This study aimed to (1) assess trainees' competence and importance in daily activities and (2) examine the association between their competence and mental well-being. We conducted a cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires. We recruited trainees through their supervising organizations and social media. We used the Occupational Self-Assessment tool to measure competence and importance in daily activities and the World Health Organization-5 Well-being Index to measure mental well-being. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the association between competence and mental well-being. Among 383 trainees, 30.6% felt difficulty expressing themselves, and 27.4% felt difficulty accomplishing goals. Almost 50% valued self-care, working towards their goals, and managing their finances. Higher competence scores were associated with higher mental well-being scores (B = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.52, 1.00). Competence may be a key to having higher mental well-being among migrant trainees in Japan. A supportive and enabling environment, as well as mental health promotion at the community level, may improve trainees' competence in daily activities.Entities:
Keywords: Japan; mental health; migrant workers; occupational therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328879 PMCID: PMC8951441 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow diagram of study participants.
Characteristics of technical intern trainees.
| Total | Chinese | Vietnamese | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Age, mean (SD) | 24.0 (6.2) | 30.5 (7.6) | 22.2 (4.3) | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Man | 155 | 40.5 | 48 | 55.8 | 107 | 36.0 |
| Woman | 228 | 59.5 | 38 | 44.2 | 190 | 64.0 |
| Completed education | ||||||
| Middle school | 32 | 8.4 | 28 | 32.6 | 4 | 1.4 |
| High school | 269 | 70.2 | 46 | 53.5 | 223 | 75.1 |
| University or above | 82 | 21.4 | 12 | 14.0 | 70 | 23.6 |
| Monthly income (Yen) | ||||||
| Less than 150,000 | 270 | 70.5 | 31 | 36.0 | 239 | 80.5 |
| 150,000 and more | 113 | 29.5 | 55 | 64.0 | 58 | 19.5 |
| Living situation | ||||||
| Live alone | 29 | 7.6 | 8 | 9.3 | 21 | 7.1 |
| Live with family or others | 354 | 92.4 | 78 | 90.7 | 276 | 92.9 |
| Length of Stay | ||||||
| Less than 1 year | 114 | 29.8 | 17 | 19.8 | 97 | 32.7 |
| 1–2 years | 118 | 30.8 | 38 | 44.2 | 80 | 26.9 |
| 2–3 years | 94 | 24.5 | 17 | 19.8 | 77 | 25.9 |
| More than 3 years | 57 | 14.9 | 14 | 16.3 | 43 | 14.5 |
| Job | ||||||
| Farming/fishery | 12 | 3.1 | 3 | 3.5 | 9 | 3.0 |
| Manufacturing | 217 | 56.7 | 19 | 22.1 | 198 | 66.7 |
| Construction | 126 | 32.9 | 47 | 54.7 | 79 | 26.6 |
| Care worker/Services | 28 | 7.3 | 17 | 19.8 | 11 | 3.7 |
| Prefecture | ||||||
| Hokkaido/Tohoku | 27 | 7.1 | 11 | 12.8 | 16 | 5.4 |
| Kanto | 176 | 46.0 | 40 | 46.5 | 136 | 45.8 |
| Chubu | 77 | 20.1 | 10 | 11.6 | 67 | 22.6 |
| Kinki | 79 | 20.6 | 17 | 19.7 | 62 | 20.9 |
| Others | 24 | 6.3 | 8 | 9.3 | 16 | 5.4 |
| Hours of work (hours/day) | ||||||
| Less than 8 h | 24 | 6.3 | 5 | 5.8 | 19 | 6.40 |
| 8 h | 298 | 77.8 | 67 | 77.9 | 231 | 77.8 |
| More than 8 h | 61 | 15.9 | 14 | 16.3 | 47 | 15.8 |
| Language level | ||||||
| None/A little | 192 | 50.1 | 69 | 80.2 | 123 | 41.4 |
| Moderate/Fluent | 191 | 49.9 | 17 | 19.8 | 174 | 58.6 |
| Social support | ||||||
| Never/Rarely | 77 | 20.1 | 16 | 18.6 | 61 | 20.5 |
| Sometimes | 184 | 48.0 | 37 | 43.0 | 147 | 49.5 |
| Always/Usually | 122 | 31.9 | 33 | 38.4 | 89 | 30.0 |
| Self-rated health | ||||||
| Very bad/Bad | 13 | 3.4 | 7 | 8.1 | 6 | 2.0 |
| Very good/Good | 370 | 96.6 | 79 | 91.9 | 291 | 98.0 |
| COVID-19 impact on: | ||||||
| Job security | ||||||
| Sustained | 348 | 90.9 | 83 | 96.5 | 265 | 89.2 |
| Suspended/Terminated | 35 | 9.0 | 3 | 3.5 | 32 | 10.8 |
| Income change | ||||||
| Increase | 66 | 17.2 | 16 | 18.6 | 50 | 16.8 |
| Decrease | 107 | 27.9 | 33 | 38.4 | 74 | 24.9 |
| Same | 210 | 54.8 | 37 | 43.0 | 173 | 58.3 |
| WHO-5, mean (SD) | 67.5 (21.3) | 57.5 (23.4) | 70.4 (19.8) | |||
| OSA competence, mean (SD) | 58.1 (8.5) | 59.3 (9.4) | 57.8 (8.2) | |||
WHO-5.
| Total | Vietnamese | Chinese | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
|
| mean 3.54 | SD 1.19 | mean 3.69 | SD 1.10 | mean 3.00 | SD 1.32 |
|
| 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 2.2 |
|
| 40 | 10.4 | 23 | 7.7 | 17 | 19.8 |
|
| 18 | 4.7 | 10 | 3.4 | 8 | 9.3 |
|
| 85 | 22.2 | 70 | 23.6 | 15 | 17.4 |
|
| 165 | 43.1 | 125 | 42.1 | 40 | 46.5 |
|
| 73 | 19.1 | 69 | 23.2 | 4 | 4.7 |
|
| mean 3.29 | SD 1.27 | mean 3.46 | SD 1.22 | mean 2.71 | SD 1.28 |
|
| 5 | 1.3 | 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 2.3 |
|
| 53 | 13.8 | 32 | 10.8 | 21 | 24.4 |
|
| 26 | 6.8 | 17 | 5.7 | 9 | 10.5 |
|
| 93 | 24.3 | 69 | 23.2 | 24 | 27.9 |
|
| 152 | 39.7 | 124 | 41.8 | 28 | 32.6 |
|
| 54 | 14.1 | 52 | 17.5 | 2 | 2.3 |
|
| mean 3.51 | SD 1.22 | mean 3.67 | SD 1.16 | mean 2.93 | SD 1.26 |
|
| 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.2 |
|
| 44 | 11.5 | 27 | 9.1 | 17 | 19.8 |
|
| 23 | 6.0 | 13 | 4.4 | 10 | 11.6 |
|
| 85 | 22.2 | 64 | 21.5 | 21 | 24.4 |
|
| 152 | 39.7 | 119 | 40.1 | 33 | 38.4 |
|
| 78 | 20.4 | 74 | 24.9 | 4 | 4.7 |
|
| mean 3.43 | SD 1.32 | mean 3.52 | SD 1.30 | mean 2.58 | SD 1.39 |
|
| 6 | 1.6 | 5 | 1.7 | 1 | 1.2 |
|
| 48 | 12.5 | 32 | 10.8 | 16 | 18.6 |
|
| 26 | 6.8 | 18 | 6.1 | 8 | 9.3 |
|
| 79 | 20.6 | 60 | 20.2 | 19 | 22.1 |
|
| 143 | 37.3 | 114 | 38.4 | 29 | 33.7 |
|
| 81 | 21.1 | 68 | 22.9 | 13 | 15.1 |
|
| mean 3.10 | SD 1.37 | mean 3.25 | SD 1.33 | mean 2.06 | SD 1.39 |
|
| 7 | 1.8 | 4 | 1.3 | 3 | 3.5 |
|
| 70 | 18.3 | 45 | 15.2 | 25 | 29.1 |
|
| 32 | 8.4 | 23 | 7.7 | 9 | 10.5 |
|
| 99 | 25.8 | 76 | 25.6 | 23 | 26.7 |
|
| 118 | 30.8 | 98 | 33.0 | 20 | 23.3 |
|
| 57 | 14.9 | 51 | 17.2 | 6 | 7.0 |
WHO 1: I have felt cheerful in good spirits. WHO 2: I have felt calm and relaxed. WHO 3: I have felt active and vigorous. WHO 4: I woke up feeling fresh and rested. WHO 5: My daily life has been filled with things that interest me.
Figure 2Proportions of competence and importance of occupation items. * A proportion of trainees who answered “I have a lot of problems doing this” or “I have some difficulty doing this” in a 4-point Likert scale question. ** A proportion of trainee who answered “this is more important to me” or “this is most important to me” in a 4-point Likert scale question.
Figure A1Correlations between Competence and Importance of Occupation Items.
Hierarchical regression analysis predicting the mental well-being among technical intern trainees in Japan (n = 383).
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 (Final Model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Coef. | Coef. | Coef. | (95% CI) | β | |
| OSA competence | 0.93 *** | 0.99 *** | 0.76 ** | 0.76 ** | (0.52, 1.00) | 0.31 |
| Nationality (ref. Chinese) | ||||||
| Vietnamese | 19.35 *** | 17.33 ** | 17.75 ** | (12.14, 23.36) | 0.35 | |
| Age | 0.44 ** | 0.38 * | 0.37 * | (0.16, 0.59) | 0.11 | |
| Gender (ref. Woman) | ||||||
| Man | −2.70 | −1.50 | −1.51 | (−3.78, 0.76) | −0.03 | |
| Completed education | ||||||
| (ref. Middle school) | ||||||
| High school | −6.81 | −5.60 | −4.81 | (−10.91, 1.29) | −0.10 | |
| University or above | −1.45 | −2.07 | −1.18 | (−5.19, 2.83) | −0.02 | |
| Monthly income (Yen) | ||||||
| (ref. Less than 149,999) | ||||||
| 150,000 and more | 0.93 | 0.95 | 1.03 | (−4.39, 6.44) | 0.02 | |
| Living arrangement (ref. Live alone) | ||||||
| Live with family/others | 4.24 | 4.85 | 4.51 | (−6.01, 15.02) | 0.06 | |
| Length of stay (ref. More than 3 years) | ||||||
| Less than 1 year | 0.91 | 2.55 | 3.11 | (−1.41, 7.63) | 0.07 | |
| 1–2 years | 0.26 | 0.75 | 1.00 | (−0.36, 2.36) | 0.02 | |
| 2–3 years | 4.60 | 6.11 | 6.06 | (−0.81, 12.98) | 0.12 | |
| Language level (ref. None/A little) | ||||||
| Moderate/Fluent | −0.55 | −0.41 | −0.35 | (−5.46, 4.77) | −0.01 | |
| Social support (ref. Always/Usually) | ||||||
| Sometimes | −7.26 ** | −7.43 ** | (−11.48, −3.39) | −0.17 | ||
| Never/Rarely | −16.41 ** | −16.81 ** | (−26.43, −7.19) | −0.32 | ||
| Self-rated health (ref. Very bad/Bad) | ||||||
| Very good/Good | 27.35 * | 27.24 * | (10.97, 43.52) | 0.23 | ||
| COVID-19 impact on: | ||||||
| Job security | ||||||
| (ref. Suspended/Terminated) | ||||||
| Sustained | 4.22 | (−9.79, 18.23) | 0.06 | |||
| Income change (ref. Decreased) | ||||||
| Increase | −4.17 | (−13.43, 5.10) | −0.07 | |||
| Same | −3.05 | (−8.67, 2.57) | −0.07 | |||
| R2 | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.40 | ||
| ΔR2 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | |||
Coef.—Unstandardized regression coefficient (B); CI—Confidence interval; β—Standardized beta coefficient; COVID-19—Coronavirus disease 2019; OSA—Occupational Self-Assessment; R2—R-squared: ΔR2—Incremental increase in R2; Statistical significance indicated by * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Interaction Term Analysis.
| Interaction Term | R Squared | |
|---|---|---|
| Nationality and Age | 0.0810 | 0.584 |
| Nationality and Completed education | 0.0828 | 0.838 |
| Nationality and Monthly income | 0.0863 | 0.035 |
| Nationality and Gender | 0.0667 | 0.491 |
| Nationality and Living situation | 0.0722 | 0.741 |
| Nationality and Job | 0.0950 | 0.258 |
| Nationality and Length of stay | 0.1063 | 0.080 |
| Nationality and Prefecture | 0.1130 | 0.096 |
| Nationality and Hours of work | 0.0710 | 0.059 |
| Nationality and Language level | 0.0679 | 0.257 |
| Nationality and Self rated health | 0.1779 | 0.208 |
| Nationality and Social support | 0.1737 | 0.827 |
| Nationality and COVID-19 impact on job security | 0.0736 | 0.863 |
| Nationality and COVID-19 impact on income change | 0.0852 | 0.754 |
| Nationality and OSA competence | 0.2221 | 0.234 |