| Literature DB >> 35328607 |
Riley E Thompson1, Gerrit J Bouma1, Fiona K Hollinshead1.
Abstract
Culture model systems that can recapitulate the anatomy and physiology of reproductive organs, such as three-dimensional (3D) organoid culture systems, limit the cost and welfare concerns associated with a research animal colony and provide alternative approaches to study specific processes in humans and animals. These 3D models facilitate a greater understanding of the physiological role of individual cell types and their interactions than can be accomplished with traditional monolayer culture systems. Furthermore, 3D culture systems allow for the examination of specific cellular, molecular, or hormonal interactions, without confounding factors that occur with in vivo models, and provide a powerful approach to study physiological and pathological reproductive conditions. The goal of this paper is to review and compare organoid culture systems to other in vitro cell culture models, currently used to study female reproductive physiology, with an emphasis on the role of extracellular vesicle interactions. The critical role of extracellular vesicles for intercellular communication in physiological processes, including reproduction, has been well documented, and an overview of the roles of extracellular vesicles in organoid systems will be provided. Finally, we will propose future directions for understanding the role of extracellular vesicles in normal and pathological conditions of reproductive organs, utilizing 3D organoid culture systems.Entities:
Keywords: 3D culture; endometrium; exosome; extracellular vesicle; in vitro; microvesicle; organoid; ovary; oviduct; reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328607 PMCID: PMC8954697 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Depiction of monolayer cell culture (A), explant immersed in culture media (B), explant with a gas–fluid interface (C), spheroid cell culture (D), organoid cell culture (E), and organ-on-a-chip (F) with A–E illustrated from a lateral perspective in a single well of a multi-welled culture plate.
Comparison of different in vitro models.
| Cell Culture Model | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monolayer | Minimal supplies required; easy to establish and maintain | Lose normal function quickly through differentiation or senescence; a single cell layer is not always physiologically relevant | Experiments to evaluate basic cell function; can be used for basic drug screening tests but not ideal for evaluating penetration of drugs in a 3D environment |
| Explant | Minimal supplies required; easy to establish; 3D structure; contains all cell types and orientation of in vivo environment | Short culture time (<1 week) while maintaining cell viability; cell necrosis in tissue center | Short-term culture experiments with the benefit of containing all cell types and structure present in vivo |
| Spheroid | Minimal supplies required; easy to establish; 3D structure is more similar to in vivo environment | Cannot self-assemble; no long-term proliferation; cell necrosis in spheroid center | Typically used for 3D cell culture using cell lines; improvement over monolayer cell culture in cellular orientation but not as similar to in vivo orientation and function as organoids |
| Organ-on-a-chip | Fluidics provides a source of continually flowing culture media that mimics the vascular system by delivering nutrients and removing waste products | Higher financial and time cost associated with fabrication and maintenance of the culture system; often cells are maintained in monolayers within the microfluidic environment which is not representative of the in vivo environment; requires some engineering expertise | Cell culture experiments with a precise hormone delivery schedule; has been demonstrated for use in the evaluation of multiple organ interactions by linking various organs-on-a-chip |
| Organoid | Self-assembly; maintains cellular polarity; long-term proliferation (months); maintains in vivo phenotype, genotype, and function | Typically a static model which does not allow for constant delivery of fresh nutrients and removal of waste; can be time-intensive if growing many organoids; often requires the use of Matrigel® which has batch variability and is of animal cell origin | Ideal for evaluating cellular function and drug trials in a manner most similar to the in vivo environment; less ideal if direct contact is needed for cellular interaction (e.g., sperm binding to oviductal cells) due to the traditional extracellular matrix requirement (Matrigel®) |
Advantages and disadvantages of organoids derived from the female reproductive tract in humans, mice, and horses.
| Tissue Type | Species | References | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ovary | Human | [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer | Utilized Cultrex® extracellular matrix, which is similar to Matrigel®, and can vary by batch and is of animal cell (Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm mouse sarcoma) origin |
| [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer such as high grade serous ovarian cancer | Utilized Matrigel® extracellular matrix which can vary by batch and is of animal cell origin | ||
| Mouse | [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer | Utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) | |
| Oviduct | Human | [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer ([ | Utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) |
| [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer | Utilized Cultrex® (see disadvantages above) | ||
| Mouse | [ | Long-term growth (months); used to model ovarian cancer ([ | Utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) | |
| Endometrium | Human | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells (secretory and ciliated); utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) |
| [ | Contained both epithelial and stromal cells | Stromal cells were initially cultured in monolayers, and epithelial cells were cultured as organoids embedded in Matrigel® before being seeded on a scaffold, but the culture time on the scaffold with both cell types was shorter than expected for organoid culture (10 days); required specialized scaffolding | ||
| [ | Contained both epithelial and stromal cells; did not require Matrigel® and instead used 3D Petri Dishes® | Culture period was not as long-term (up to 21 days) as expected for organoid culture | ||
| Mouse | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells; utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) | |
| Horse | [ | Long-term growth; no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells; utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) | |
| Trophoblast | Human | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) |
| Cervix | Human | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells; utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) |
| Mouse | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells; utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) | |
| Vagina | Mouse | [ | Long-term growth (months); no specialized equipment or scaffolding required | Contained only epithelial cells; utilized Matrigel® (see disadvantages above) |
Figure 2Depiction of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by the apical (yellow EVs) and basal (green EVs) aspects of organoids in cell culture.
Figure 3Bovine oviductal organoids after 14 days in culture (A), and a graph of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) using ZetaView® technology of the size distribution of extracellular vesicles collected from bovine oviductal organoid conditioned media following differential ultracentrifugation (B).