| Literature DB >> 35328189 |
Mihai Popescu1, Monica Scrieciu2, Eugen Osiac3, Marilena Bătăiosu1, Diana Vlăduțu2, Roxana Maria Pascu2, Andreea Stănuși2, Adina Dorina Glodeanu4, Mihaela Ionescu5, Veronica Mercuț2.
Abstract
Developmental defects of enamel (DDEs) are deviations from the normal appearance in terms of the quantity and quality of tooth enamel. They may be genetic or acquired. The most important DDEs are hypomineralization and hypoplasia. The aim of this study was to produce "in vivo" DDE in Wistar rats by administering amoxicillin to pregnant females and to highlight these lesions after sacrifice of the pups by macroscopic and microscopic examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Amoxicillin (100 mg/kg) was administered to two pregnant Wistar female rats for the production of DDEs. When the pups were 2 months old, they were sacrificed, and their jaws were harvested together with their teeth. The jaws were examined macroscopically, microscopically, and by OCT. Following the macroscopic and microscopic examination, it was established that four pups had a total of 42 DDE lesions. At the OCT examination, the hypomineralization was characterized by an intense, inhomogeneous OCT signal, and the hypoplasia was characterized by the absence of the signal. Administration of amoxicillin to pregnant females of Wistar rats resulted in DDEs in their offspring. The OCT examination confirmed the presence of these lesions in the teeth of rat pups.Entities:
Keywords: developmental defects of enamel; hypomineralization; hypoplasia; optical coherence tomography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328189 PMCID: PMC8947673 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Rat jaw.
Distribution of our study lot, according to DDE presence.
| Rat Pups | ||
|---|---|---|
| with DDE | without DDE | |
| Number of pups | 4 | 11 |
| Number of analyzed teeth | 64 | 484 |
| Number of DDE | 42 | 0 |
| Hypoplasia | 9 | 0 |
| Hypomineralization | 33 | 0 |
Figure 2Hypomineralization lesion (surrounded by the red oval) on the occlusal surface of 26.
Figure 3Hypoplasia lesion (surrounded by the red oval) on the palatal surface of 27.
Figure 4Two-dimensional OCT images of a tooth with hypomineralization (areas marked by yellow arrows): (a) cusp presenting a hypomineralization area; (b) extended area of hypomineralization, divided by a bridge of healthy enamel; (c) small-size hypomineralization area; (d) cusp presenting a hypomineralization area (scale bar 100 μm).
Figure 5Two-dimensional OCT images of a tooth with hypoplasia (areas marked by yellow arrows): (a–d) four frames emphasizing the same hypoplasia lesion, from different perspectives (scale bar 100 μm).
Figure 6Three-dimensional OCT reconstruction of hypomineralization areas (Axis 0Y). The blue arrows indicate three well-defined areas; the yellow arrows indicate several small-size diffuse areas.
Figure 7Volumetric reconstruction (in ImageJ) of hypomineralization areas marked by blue arrows. The yellow arrow indicates a small hypoplasia lesion, which was not initially identified in 2D OCT images analysis.
Figure 8Three-dimensional OCT reconstruction (in ImageJ) of a hypoplasia lesion (Axis 0Y). The yellow arrows indicate a continuous area characterized by the absence of signal, similar to the appearance of a dental crack or fracture.
Figure 9Volumetric reconstruction (in ImageJ) of a hypoplasia lesion. The yellow arrows indicate the affected area, defined by a discontinuity of the enamel at the surface of the tooth; this lesion extends beyond the dentinoenamel junction.