| Literature DB >> 29515175 |
Clara Serna Muñoz1, Amparo Pérez Silva1, Francisco Solano2, María Teresa Castells3, Ascensión Vicente4, Antonio José Ortiz Ruiz1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in childhood could disturb enamel mineralization. Forty-two Swiss mice were divided into seven groups: controls; amoxicillin; amoxicillin/clavulanate; erythromycin; acetaminophen; ibuprofen and celecoxib, to inhibit cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2). SEM-EDX analysis was conducted on all cusps of the third molars. Calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), aluminum, potassium, sodium, magnesium and chlorine were quantified. The stoichiometric Ca/P molar ratios were calculated. Immunohistochemical quantification of COX2 in incisors was carried out by image analysis using COX2-specific immunostaining. Groups treated with antibiotics showed no significant differences in the content of the chemical elements. Only acetaminophen and celecoxib showed a significant decrease in Ca and P compared with the control samples. Ca/P ratios showed no difference. Groups treated with amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, erythromycin and acetaminophen showed significantly lower amounts of immunoreactive COX2 at the enamel organ maturation stage of the mouse incisors. Our results suggest that COX2 is involved in the maturation stage of the enamel organ and that its inhibition would appear to alter amelogenesis, producing hypomineralization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515175 PMCID: PMC5841276 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22607-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Ca/P ratio and content of elements (expressed as % /w) present in murine molar (M3) enamel treated for 30 days with antibiotics and NSAIDs.
| Treatment | Ca | P | Al | K | Na | Mg | Cl | Ca/P ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 46.94 ± 4.80 | 21.83 ± 2.54 | 0.53 ± 0.29 | 1.04 ± 0.36 | 0.62 ± 0.13 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 1.66 ± 0.09 |
| Amoxicillin | 43.06 ± 5.19 | 20.05 ± 1.50 | 0.41 ± 0.35 | 1.78 ± 1.47 | 0.62 ± 0.14 | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 1.66 ± 0.20 |
| Amox + Clavul | 47.18 ± 6.14 | 22.37 ± 2.19 | 0.71 ± 0.37 | 1.16 ± 0.46 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 1.63 ± 0.09 |
| Erythromycin | 44.79 ± 4.34 | 21.21 ± 2.07 | 0.67 ± 0.42 | 1.15 ± 0.40 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.08 | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 1.63 ± 0.09 |
| Ibuprofen | 42.00 ± 6.03 | 19.06 ± 1.31 | 0.39 ± 0.22 | 1.13 ± 0.51 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 0.30 ± 0.24 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1.66 ± 0.18 |
| Acetaminophen | 36.73 ± 5.75a | 17.92 ± 3.81a | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 1.25 ± 0.45 | 0.53 ± 0.23 | 0.34 ± 0.14 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 1.62 ± 0.35 |
| Celecoxib | 37.45 ± 6.61a | 18.03 ± 2.82a | 0.47 ± 0.12 | 1.16 ± 0.65 | 0.53 ± 0.18 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 1.60 ± 0.14 |
Ca: calcium; P: phosphorous; Al: aluminum; K: potassium; Na: sodium; Mg: magnesium; Cl: chlorine. ap < 0.05 versus control.
COX2 immunocytochemical quantification of the study groups.
| Group | COX2 (grey value x % immunolabeled area)* |
|---|---|
| Control | 41.07 ± 9.78 |
| Amoxicillin | 13.00 ± 1.89a.b |
| Amoxicillin/Clavulanate | 13.27 ± 1.22a.b |
| Erythromycin | 21.47 ± 3.65a.b |
| Ibuprofen | 31.55 ± 5.66 |
| Acetaminophen | 14.11 ± 3.13a.b |
| Celecoxib | 38.32 ± 4.55 |
*Negative images were used for immunocytochemical quantification (see material and methods section). Values expressed as mean +/− SEM of six animals. Differences: p < 0.05: aCOX2 content was lower in comparison with control samples: bCOX2 content was lower in comparison with celecoxib.
Figure 1COX2 Immunostaining at the enamel organ maturation stage of mouse incisors. Intense immunoreactivity for COX2 is seen in the control (a) and celecoxib (g) groups. Weak immunoreactivity is shown in the amoxicillin (b), amoxicillin/clavulanate (c), erythromycin (d), and acetaminophen (f) groups and medium immunoreactivity in the ibuprofen (e) group. Note that COX2 immunoreactivity is indicated in three regions (ameloblast, papillary layer, and capillaries). A high degree of staining can be seen in the supranuclear region and apical cytoplasm of ameloblasts, while the basal region remains unlabeled. High reactivity is also seen inside the capillaries of the papillary layer, but diffuse staining is observed in the papillary layer proper. A: ameloblast, Pl: papillary layer, E: space occupied by enamel. Scale bar 50 μm.