| Literature DB >> 35327632 |
Evelien Van Schoor1,2,3, Mathieu Vandenbulcke4, Valérie Bercier2,3, Rik Vandenberghe5,6, Julie van der Zee7,8, Christine Van Broeckhoven7,8, Markus Otto9,10, Bernard Hanseeuw11, Philip Van Damme2,3,6, Ludo Van Den Bosch2,3, Dietmar Rudolf Thal1,12.
Abstract
Recently, disease-associated variants of the TUBA4A gene were identified in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Here, we present the neuropathological report of a patient with the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia with a family history of Parkinsonism, harboring a novel frameshift mutation c.187del (p.Arg64Glyfs*90) in TUBA4A. Immunohistochemistry showed abundant TAR DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) dystrophic neurite pathology in the frontal and temporal cortex and the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, consistent with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The observed pathology pattern fitted best with that of FTLD-TDP Type C. qPCR showed the presence of mutant TUBA4A mRNA. However, no truncated TUBA4A was detected at the protein level. A decrease in total TUBA4A mRNA and protein levels suggests loss-of-function as a potential pathogenic mechanism. This report strengthens the idea that N-terminal TUBA4A mutations are associated with FTLD-TDP. These N-terminal mutations possibly exert their pathogenic effects through haploinsufficiency, contrary to C-terminal TUBA4A mutations which are thought to disturb the microtubule network via a dominant-negative mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: TUBA4A; frontotemporal dementia; transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 kD
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35327632 PMCID: PMC8946841 DOI: 10.3390/biom12030440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Imaging of the FTD patient with an R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation. (a,b) Stereotactic surface projections showing lateral views of the left (a) and right (b) hemisphere of an 18F-FDG-PET of the patient, with areas of significant decrease of glucose metabolism superimposed. The scan shows a regional decrease in glucose metabolism in the anterior temporal lobes, more pronounced to the right compared to the left. Color-coding refers to Z-scores with respect to a dataset of normal control subjects. (c,d) MRI (T2-weighted) at the level of the temporal lobe (coronal in (c); horizontal in (d)) shows temporal lobar degeneration typical for FTLD. L = left; R = right.
Figure 2Pedigree of the family of the FTD patient with an R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation. Diamond-shaped symbols were used for anonymity. Filled black symbols represent clinically affected patients. A diagonal line marks deceased patients. The individual ID and relevant clinical neurological diagnosis are mentioned for each patient. The FTD patient with an R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation is indicated with a red arrow. PD = Parkinson’s disease; MSA = multi system atrophy; SD = semantic dementia; EPS = extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figure 3Histopathological characterization of the FTLD-TDP case with an R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation. (a–h) pTDP-43 pathology is spread over all layers of the frontal cortex in the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case, whereas in a typical FTLD-TDP type C case predominantly the second layer is affected (a,b). pTDP-43 pathology in the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case mainly consists of dystrophic neurites of various length and thickness, and few neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the frontal cortex (layers II and V depicted; (c–f)). The dentate gyrus shows typical pTDP-43-positive cytoplasmic inclusions (g,h). Scale bars represent 100 μm (a,b) and 50 μm (c–h).
TUBA4A RNA levels. Fold change of R64Gfs*90 mutant TUBA4A and WT (wild-type) TUBA4A RNA levels compared to control samples (n = 3) and relative to GAPDH for the frontal and temporal cortex of the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case. Probes were used in combination and worked through competitive inhibition. Fc = frontal cortex, Tc = temporal cortex.
| R64Gfs*90 Case Fc | R64Gfs*90 Case Tc | |
|---|---|---|
| Mutant TUBA4A | 2.29 | 4.78 |
| WT TUBA4A | 0.24 | 0.51 |
Figure 4R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation does not give rise to a mutant protein fragment. (a) Schematic overview of the TUBA4A protein structure indicating the location of the R64Gfs*90 and W407* mutations. The asterisk indicates the location of the early stop codon after amino acid 154 due to the R64Gfs*90 frameshift. The predicted molecular weight of the protein fragment is 16.8 kDa. (b) Western blot on the total fraction of the frontal cortex of the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case using an antibody directed against the N-terminal part of TUBA4A, indicating that there was no truncated TUBA4A protein product present. (c) Western blot using an anti-HA-tag antibody on zebrafish lysates at 6 h post fertilization after the injection of wild-type, R64Gfs*90 or W407* mutant TUBA4A mRNA. No R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A protein fragment could be detected around 16.8 kD (asterisk), while the W407* shortened protein product was present. N = N-terminus; C = C-terminus.
Figure 5R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation causes reduction in levels of wild-type TUBA4A protein. (a) Biochemical analysis of the total TUBA4A expression levels in control cases (F = frontal, P = precentral cortex), FTLD-TDP patients (F = frontal cortex) and different brain regions of the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case (frontal cortex, temporal cortex, precentral cortex and cerebellum). (b) Quantification relative to GAPDH shows decreased TUBA4A protein expression in affected brain regions in the R64Gfs*90 TUBA4A mutation case. Each data point represents a single patient.