| Literature DB >> 35326120 |
Sunjeet Kumar1,2, Xinfang Huang2, Qun Ji2, Abdul Qayyum3, Kai Zhou2, Weidong Ke2, Honglian Zhu2, Guopeng Zhu1.
Abstract
Field blanching is a process used in agriculture to obtain sweet, delicious, and tender stems of water dropwort by obstructing sunlight. The nutritional and transcriptomic profiling of blanched water dropwort has been investigated in our previous studies. However, the effect of blanching on the production of secondary metabolites and different vitamins in water dropwort has not been investigated at the transcriptomic level. This study explored the transcriptomic variations in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, and different vitamin biosynthesis pathways under different blanching periods in the water dropwort stems (pre-blanching, mid-blanching, post-blanching, and control). The results show that polyphenol and flavonoid contents decreased; however, the contents of vitamins (A, B1, B2, and C) and antioxidant activity increased significantly after blanching. Furthermore, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of blanched water dropwort showed the downregulation of many important genes involved in phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways, and the downregulation of these genes might be the reason for the reduction in polyphenol and flavonoid contents. We also examined and highlighted the genes involved in the higher vitamin content, antioxidant activity, pale color, tenderness, and sweetness of the blanched stem of water dropwort. In conclusion, the present study explored the role of phenylpropanoid and vitamin biosynthesis, and it will provide a basis for future investigation and application in the blanch cultivation of water dropwort.Entities:
Keywords: Oenanthe javanica; RNA-seq analysis; antioxidant activity; blanching; secondary metabolites; vitamins
Year: 2022 PMID: 35326120 PMCID: PMC8944621 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11030470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
List of primers for qRT-PCR analysis.
|
|
| Tm |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| 54.4 |
| TTGAGCGGAGGGAGTACTAT | ||
| GCGATGCCTTCTTCCAAATA | ||
|
|
| 55.0 |
| AGTAGCAGAAGGTGACAAAG | ||
| CAGCATAGTAACGCAAAGTG | ||
|
|
| 55.3 |
| GGTTCTATGGCTCGATTACC | ||
| TCATGCAACTGGAAAGGATT | ||
|
|
| 54.9 |
| TTGAAGCCCAGATTCTTGAA | ||
| CATCACTTTCCTCACATTGC | ||
|
|
| 54.7 |
| GTTGGAATAGGGTGCTTAGT | ||
| CAGCACATAATAGAGGAGCA | ||
|
|
| 55.0 |
| CACGTGGACTGGACTTATAG | ||
| CTAGCTTTGCCCGAATATCT | ||
|
|
| 54.8 |
| CCTACAATTTCTGATGCTGC | ||
| GGATGCTATTCTTGCTCTCA | ||
|
|
| 53.4 |
| TTATATTCACTGCCACGCCT | ||
| CAAGGTTTGGGCACTGAAAA | ||
|
|
| 54.4 |
| ATGCTGATGATGGACCAGTT | ||
| GCCCGGTCATATGAAAGGTA | ||
|
|
| 55.4 |
| GCCAAAGAAAACGGGACTAC | ||
| CAACTCGGACTTTGCTCTTG | ||
|
|
| 54.9 |
| TTTGCCCGTTCTTGATCATA | ||
| CTCGATCACAAAGTCTCTGT | ||
Blanching effect on the contents of total polyphenols, flavonoids, DPPH, and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) in the stem of water dropwort.
| Treatment | TPC mg GAE/ 100 mg FW | TFC mg CAE/ 100 mg FW | %DPPH Scavenging Activity | T-AOC (U/mg Protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 447.1 ± 27.1 b | 220.2 ± 19.3 b | 51.1 ± 4.4 ab | 1.04 ± 0.11 a |
| Mid | 475.7 ± 8.9 c | 236.4 ± 20.7 b | 44.9 ± 2.4 a | 3.88 ± 0.24 b |
| Post | 307.9 ± 26.3 a | 126.3 ± 10.3 a | 56.3 ± 3.5 ab | 4.29 ± 0.39 b |
| Control | 386.0 ± 30.2 bc | 168.1 ± 13.1 b | 63.1 ± 4.7 b | 0.93 ± 0.06 a |
Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among the treatments according to the Tukey test. Values are means ± SE.
Effect of blanching on the content of vitamins in the stem of water dropwort.
| Treatment | Vitamin A µg/g FW | Vitamin B1 µg/g FW | Vitamin B2 µg/g FW | Vitamin C mg/g FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 0.680 ± 0.05 a | 1.065 ± 0.06 a | 0.870 ± 0.05 a | 0.068 ± 0.004 b |
| Mid | 0.755 ± 0.03 a | 1.390 ± 0.03 b | 1.054 ± 0.04 b | 0.106 ± 0.006 c |
| Post | 0.984 ± 0.04 b | 1.593 ± 0.06 c | 1.164 ± 0.09 b | 0.120 ± 0.005 d |
| Control | 0.657 ± 0.03 a | 1.111 ± 0.07 a | 0.885 ± 0.06 a | 0.024 ± 0.001 a |
Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among the treatments according to the Tukey test. Values are means ± SE.
Figure 1Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in water dropwort stem under blanched and control conditions. (A) Mid−blanched, (B) post−blanched, and (C) control conditions. Pre−blanching samples were used as a reference for comparison.
Figure 2Heat map of DEGs involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway in the water dropwort under mid−blanched, post−blanched, and control conditions.
Figure 3Heat map of DEGs involved in flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in the stem of water dropwort under mid−blanched, post−blanched, and control conditions.
Figure 4Heat map of upregulated DEGs involved in vitamin biosynthetic pathways in water dropwort under mid−blanched, post−blanched, and control conditions.
Figure 5qRT−PCR analysis of ten representative genes for the confirmation of RNA−seq data. The bars on the qPCR data depict the means ± SD.