| Literature DB >> 35323827 |
Justin X Boeckman1,2, Sarah Sprayberry1, Abby M Korn1, Jan S Suchodolski3, Chad Paulk1,4, Kenneth Genovese5, Raquel R Rech6, Paula R Giaretta6,7, Anna K Blick6, Todd Callaway5,8, Jason J Gill9,10.
Abstract
Post-weaning enteropathies in swine caused by pathogenic E. coli, such as post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) or edema disease (ED), remain a significant problem for the swine industry. Reduction in the use of antibiotics over concerns of antibiotic resistance and public health concerns, necessitate the evaluation of effective antibiotic alternatives to prevent significant loss of livestock and/or reductions in swine growth performance. For this purpose, an appropriate piglet model of pathogenic E. coli enteropathy is required. In this study, we attempted to induce clinical signs of post-weaning disease in a piglet model using a one-time acute or lower daily chronic dose of a pathogenic E. coli strain containing genes for both heat stable and labile toxins, as well as Shiga toxin. The induced disease state was monitored by determining fecal shedding and colonization of the challenge strain, animal growth performance, cytokine levels, fecal calprotectin, histology, fecal metabolomics, and fecal microbiome shifts. The most informative analyses were colonization and shedding of the pathogen, serum cytokines, metabolomics, and targeted metagenomics to determine dysbiosis. Histopathological changes of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and tight junction leakage as measured by fecal calprotectin concentrations were not observed. Chronic dosing was similar to the acute regimen suggesting that a high dose of pathogen, as used in many studies, may not be necessary. The piglet disease model presented here can be used to evaluate alternative PWD treatment options.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323827 PMCID: PMC8943154 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08446-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effects of E. coli 62-57nal treatment on nursery pig performance.
| Item | Treatment | Probability, P < | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Acute | Chronic | SEM | ||
| ADG, g | 263 | 119 | 225 | 55.93 | 0.224 |
| ADFI, g | 179 | 210 | 232 | 43.05 | 0.688 |
| G:F | 2.02 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.722 | 0.184 |
Table Growth performance: A total of 24 weaned barrows (initial BW approximately 14 lb; Landrace × Large White) were used in a 7 d study. Pigs were housed 2 pigs per pen with a total of 4 pens per treatment. Treatments refer to the following: Control = Pigs administered a sham challenge of PBS each day, Acute = pigs administered approximately 1010 CFU of E. coli 62-57nal on d 1 then sham challenged for the remaining time, Chronic = pigs administered approximately 108 CFU of E. coli 62-57nal from d 1 to d 6.
Figure 1Acute and chronic regimens are sufficient to cause colonization of E. coli 62-57nal. (A) At time of necropsy, intestinal scrapings from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon were collected and plated for bacterial enumeration. Additionally, cecum and colon contents were collected for direct plating. (B) Fecal samples were collected from each pen on day 1,3, and 6. These samples were serial diluted and plated for direct enumeration of bacteria. LOD ~ 5 × 102 CFU/G. Both (A) and (B) Circles indicate sampling data points, diamonds indicate mean. Sample data was transformed using LOG10. Treatment means grouped by day/section with different letters were significantly different (P < 0.05), those lacking letters indicate no level of significance.
Figure 2Effect on Serum Cytokines IL-8 and IL-6. On day 6, serum samples were taken from each piglet. Samples were tested by ELISA and data was transformed using Log10. Means with different letters within each cytokine differ significantly (P < 0.05). Error bars represent SEM.
qPCR Summary Table LOGSQ treatment mean compared to Control at each time point (Left) and LOGSQ treatment mean at day 6 compared to its corresponding pretreatment sample at Day-1 (Right). Non-parametric Wilcoxon exact test performed on LOGSQ. Only those significant or marginally significant listed here, significant defined at P < 0.05 and marginally significant at P < 0.10. (▲) or (▼) indicate mean LOGSQ are greater than or less than relative to control or Pretreatment. Significant** Marginally Significant*.
| Bacterial Groups that change from Control at Day 1 | Bacterial Groups that change from Control at Day 3 | Bacterial Groups that change from Control at Day 6 | Bacterial Groups that change at Day 6 from their corresponding pretreatment sample at Day −1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | Chronic | Acute | Chronic | Acute | Chronic | Acute | Chronic | Control |
Fusobacterium* ▼ (0.0571) | Fusobacterium* ▼ (0.0571) | ▲ (0.0286) | Faecalibacterium** ▲ (0.0286) | Fusobacterium** ▲ (0.0286) | Bacteroidetes** ▲ (0.0286) | Bacteroidetes** ▲ (0.0143) | Enterococcus** ▲ (0.0286) | |
Enterococcus* ▼ (0.0571) | Streptococcus** ▲ (0.0286) | Universal** ▲ (0.0286) | Ruminococcaceae** ▲ (0.0143) | Enterococcus** ▲ (0.0286) | Enterococcus** ▲ (0.0143) | ▲ (0.0571) | ||
▲ (0.0571) | Firmicutes* ▲ (0.0571) | Faecalibacterium* ▲ (0.0571) | Faecalibacterium** ▲ (0.0286) | Lactobacillus** ▲ (0.0143) | ||||
Bacteroides* ▲ (0.0571) | ▲ (0.0571) | Lactobacillus** ▲ (0.0286) | Streptococcus** ▲ (0.0286) | |||||
Lactobacillus* ▲ (0.0571) | Firmicutes** ▲ (0.0286) | ▲ (0.0571) | ||||||
▲ (0.0571) | Universal** ▲ (0.0286) | Ruminococcaceae* ▼ (0.0571) | ||||||
Streptococcus* ▲ (0.0571) | ||||||||
Fusobacterium* ▲ (0.0571) | ||||||||
Figure 3Clustering of treatments by principal component analysis (PCA) of metagenomic and metabolomic results. By the end of the trial period, both chronic and acute treatments are able to be separated from their respective pretreatment samples using qPCR and metabolomic data while the control group remains relatively constant. (A) PCA comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment samples using 16S qPCR of major bacterial taxonomic groups. Red dots indicate pre-treatment samples, green diamonds indicate post-treatment samples, and green/red ellipses represent 95% confidence regions. (B) PCA comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment samples using identifiable fecal metabolites.
Figure 4Volcano plots comparing changes in identifiable metabolite profiles in pre- and post- treatment fecal samples. Figures show metabolites that significantly changed from day −1 to day 6 within each pathogenic E. coli dosing regimen. Points represent individual metabolites, which are color-coded based on the Human Metabolomics Database chemical taxonomy [51]. Dotted lines indicate significance cutoffs of P-value < 0.1 (Y-axis) and > twofold change in abundance (X-axis); points in the upper left and right quadrants of each graph represent metabolites with significant, > twofold changes from pre- to post-treatment. Point shape indicates if a metabolite is shared by the acute and chronic treatments (squares) or chronic and control treatments (triangles); circular points indicate metabolites that were either not detected or had non-significant changes in other treatments. Both of the E. coli-treated groups exhibited elevated levels of metabolites associated with amino acids and reduced metabolites associated with fatty acids compared to the control group.