| Literature DB >> 35323685 |
Huixin Zuo1,2, Pengsen Wang1,2, Zonglin Guo3, Xin Luo1,2, Yimin Zhang1,2, Yanwei Mao1,2.
Abstract
Currently, the metabolomic research on water-holding capacity (WHC) of beef during postmortem aging is still insufficient. In this paper, the kit method was adopted for energy metabolites testing, the ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system was used for sample separation, and the mass spectrometer was applied to collect the primary and secondary spectra of the samples. The results showed that lactic acid reached saturation at day 2 postmortem, while energy metabolites changed significantly within day 2 postmortem (p < 0.05). Based on these findings, it was suggested that the energy metabolism qualities of the beef had already achieved a largely stable state at around day 2 postmortem. Then, through metabolomic analysis, 25 compounds were differentially abundant at days 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 during postmortem aging. Within the period of day 0-2 postmortem, the purine metabolism in beef was relatively active until 0.5 d postmortem, while glycolysis metabolism remained active until day 2 postmortem. The functions of the identified metabolites contribute to a more detailed molecular view of the processes behind WHC and are a valuable resource for future investigations into the flavor of postmortem beef.Entities:
Keywords: aging; beef; flavor; metabolome; water-holding capacity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323685 PMCID: PMC8950885 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12030242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Changes in quality characteristics of beef LL muscle during postmortem aging at 4 °C (d 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7).
| Traits | 0 d | 0.5 d | 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 5 d | 7 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 5.75 ± 0.01 a | 5.71 ± 0.02 b | 5.65 ± 0.03 c | 5.45 ± 0.03 e | 5.46 ± 0.03 e | 5.49 ± 0.01 e | 5.55 ± 0.02 d |
| Drip loss (%) | 2.19 ± 0.06 f | 2.31 ± 0.04 g | 2.49 ± 0.08 e | 2.86 ± 0.03 d | 4.1 ± 0.03 a | 3.91 ± 0.02 b | 3.42 ± 0.03 c |
| Cooking loss (%) | 19.15 ± 0.63 d | 19.29 ± 0.37 d | 19.45 ± 0.82 d | 22.21 ± 0.93 bc | 25.37 ± 1.18 a | 23.02 ± 0.84 b | 21.27 ± 0.55 c |
a–g Means without common superscripts in a row within are different (p < 0.05).
Changes in energy metabolism of beef LL muscle during postmortem aging at 4 °C (d 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7).
| Traits | 0 d | 0.5 d | 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 5 d | 7 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycogen (mg·g−1) | 5.58 ± 0.09 a | 4.63 ± 0.07 b | 3.72 ± 0.07 c | 2.19 ± 0.1 d | 2.03 ± 0.08 de | 1.91 ± 0.09 e | 1.89 ± 0.12 e |
| Lactic acid (ng·mL−1) | 100.67 ± 11.68 c | 118.33 ± 12.50 c | 172 ± 11.00 b | 231.67 ± 12.10 a | 231 ± 12.77 a | 225 ± 10.54 a | 217 ± 15.39 a |
| Free glucose (mmol·L−1) | 9.39 ± 0.07 a | 8.33 ± 0.07 b | 7.90 ± 0.14 c | 6.48 ± 0.1 e | 6.39 ± 0.15 e | 6.31 ± 0.13 e | 6.26 ± 0.11 e |
| ATP (μmol·g−1) | 3.53 ± 0.08 a | 2.72 ± 0.09 b | 1.98 ± 0.11 c | 0.77 ± 0.12 d | 0.66 ± 0.12 d | 0.57 ± 0.11 d | 0.51 ± 0.14 d |
| ADP (μmol·g−1) | 4.52 ± 0.1 a | 2.60 ± 0.09 b | 1.36 ± 0.08 c | 0.49 ± 0.12 d | 0.36 ± 0.11 d | 0.30 ± 0.10 d | 0.29 ± 0.10 d |
| AMP (μmol·g−1) | 0.3 ± 0.03 a | 0.20 ± 0.04 b | 0.21 ± 0.03 b | 0.19 ± 0.03 b | 0.15 ± 0.04 b | 0.14 ± 0.04 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 b |
a–e Means without common superscripts in a row within are different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1PCA analysis of beef LL muscle during postmortem aging at 4 °C (days 0, 0.5, 1, and 2). PCA is made by all the peak ions. The clustering degree of QC samples reflects the repeatability of the experiment. In the score plot, the green, dark blue, purple, and orange dots represent the sample group at days 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 during postmortem aging, respectively. The blue dots represent the QC samples.
Figure 2OPLS-DA model. Two hundred rounds of permutation testing were done per component. p < 0.05 was used for statistical analysis. (A) Positive ion mode; (B) Negative ion mode.
Identification of differential metabolites in LL muscle during postmortem aging.
| Name | Accession Number | Adduct |
| Fold Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5/0 d | 1/0 d | 2/0 d | ||||
|
| ||||||
| S-Methyl-5’-thioadenosine | M298T94 | (M + H)+ | 298.0968 | 3.77 | 4.70 | 3.69 |
| L-Palmitoylcarnitine | M400T164 | (M + H)+ | 400.3411 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| 1-Palmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine | M496T162 | (M + H)+ | 496.3374 | 1.50 | 2.31 | 1.43 |
| 2-Keto-D-gluconic acid | M159T220 | (M + H − 2H2O)+ | 159.0265 | 2.71 | 2.60 | 2.18 |
| Hypoxanthine | M137T185 | (M + H)+ | 137.0456 | 3.97 | 3.96 | 3.26 |
| Larixinic acid | M127T467 | (M + H)+ | 127.0382 | 1.40 | 1.63 | 1.94 |
| Allopurinol riboside | M269T211 | (M + H) + | 269.0875 | 3.66 | 4.24 | 3.25 |
| 1-Oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine | M522T148 | (M + H)+ | 522.3536 | 1.43 | 2.65 | 1.52 |
| D-Mannose-6-phosphate | M261T494 | (M + H)+ | 261.0360 | 1.50 | 1.48 | 2.12 |
| Adenosine | M250T91 | (M + H − H2O)+ | 250.0923 | 4.65 | 3.33 | 2.23 |
|
| ||||||
| Xanthine | M151T213_2 | (M − H)− | 151.0262 | 4.19 | 4.41 | 3.63 |
| Guanosine 5’-monophosphate | M362T455 | (M − H)− | 362.0479 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.72 |
| S-Methyl-5’-thioadenosine | M296T91 | (M − H)− | 296.0794 | 3.78 | 3.88 | 4.58 |
| Uric acid | M167T193 | (M − H)− | 167.0198 | 4.95 | 4.69 | 4.27 |
| Hypoxanthine | M135T191_2 | (M − H)− | 135.0309 | 3.03 | 3.06 | 2.84 |
| D-Sorbitol | M181T285 | (M − H)− | 181.0710 | 2.59 | 3.08 | 3.77 |
| Glyceric acid | M105T296 | (M − H)− | 105.0188 | 2.43 | 12.85 | 6.99 |
| L-Arabinose | M149T150 | (M − H)− | 149.0445 | 1.95 | 2.68 | 2.37 |
| Hydroxyisocaproic acid | M131T133 | (M − H)− | 131.0703 | 2.46 | 2.13 | 2.23 |
| Arachidonic acid | M303T38 | (M − H)− | 303.2318 | 1.92 | 2.70 | 2.29 |
| Urocanic acid | M154T266 | (M + NH4 − 2H)− | 154.0611 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.54 |
| Fructose 1-phosphate | M519T448 | (2M − H)− | 519.0505 | 1.73 | 1.95 | 2.74 |
| 11(Z),14(Z)-Eicosadienoic acid | M307T38 | (M − H)− | 307.2615 | 1.73 | 1.90 | 2.21 |
| 7Z, 10Z, 13Z, 16Z, 19Z-Docosapentaenoic acid | M329T38 | (M − H)− | 329.2466 | 1.58 | 2.29 | 1.61 |
| D-Mannose 1-phosphate | M259T467 | (M − H)− | 259.0219 | 1.41 | 0.70 | 1.74 |
Fold change means the ratio of changes in metabolite abundance between 0.5 and 0 d, 1 and 0 d, and 2 and 0 d, respectively.
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering analysis of differential metabolites. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using R software 3.6.3. Through this software, we carried out Z-score standardization operation.
Figure 4KEGG analysis of intermetabolites. In the bar chart, the vertical axis represents each KEGG metabolic pathway, while the horizontal axis represents the number of differential metabolites contained in each KEGG metabolic pathway and the numbers in front of horizontal bars represent the ratio of differential metabolites to total metabolites. The color represents the p-value of the enrichment analysis. The darker the color, the smaller the p-value, and the more statistically significant.