| Literature DB >> 35323253 |
Esubalew Kasaw Gebeyehu1,2, Xiaofeng Sui1,3, Biruk Fentahun Adamu2,4, Kura Alemayehu Beyene2, Melkie Getnet Tadesse5.
Abstract
The use of hydrogel in tissue engineering is not entirely new. In the last six decades, researchers have used hydrogel to develop artificial organs and tissue for the diagnosis of real-life problems and research purposes. Trial and error dominated the first forty years of tissue generation. Nowadays, biomaterials research is constantly progressing in the direction of new materials with expanded capabilities to better meet the current needs. Knowing the biological phenomenon at the interaction among materials and the human body has promoted the development of smart bio-inert and bio-active polymeric materials or devices as a result of vigorous and consistent research. Hydrogels can be tailored to contain properties such as softness, porosity, adequate strength, biodegradability, and a suitable surface for adhesion; they are ideal for use as a scaffold to provide support for cellular attachment and control tissue shapes. Perhaps electrical conductivity in hydrogel polymers promotes the interaction of electrical signals among artificial neurons and simulates the physiological microenvironment of electro-active tissues. This paper presents a review of the current state-of-the-art related to the complete process of conductive hydrogel manufacturing for tissue engineering from cellulosic materials. The essential properties required by hydrogel for electro-active-tissue regeneration are explored after a short overview of hydrogel classification and manufacturing methods. To prepare hydrogel from cellulose, the base material, cellulose, is first synthesized from plant fibers or generated from bacteria, fungi, or animals. The natural chemistry of cellulose and its derivatives in the fabrication of hydrogels is briefly discussed. Thereafter, the current scenario and latest developments of cellulose-based conductive hydrogels for tissue engineering are reviewed with an illustration from the literature. Finally, the pro and cons of conductive hydrogels for tissue engineering are indicated.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; conductive hydrogel; electro-active tissues; hydrogel design and characterization; tissue engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323253 PMCID: PMC8953959 DOI: 10.3390/gels8030140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1Structure of hydrogel.
Figure 2Classification bases of hydrogel.
Figure 3Cellulose structure.
Figure 4Cellulose source.
Figure 5Sol–gel transition.
Figure 6Chemical structure of ether derivatives, where R1 is OCH3, OCH2CH3, OCH3, [CH2CH2O]nH, and O[CH2CH(CH3)O]H OCH2COONa for MC, EC, HEMC, HPC, and CMC, respectively.
Summary of some cellulose derivatives and their corresponding hydrogel processing methods (copied from Reference [58]).
| Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives | Nature of Solvent | Solvent Systems | Corresponding Hydrogel Preparation Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose form wood | Polar solvents | NMMO | Solution polymerization at 85 °C |
| Cellulose from cotton pulp | Polar solvents | LiCl/DMAc | Solution polymerization at 75–90 °C |
| Filter paper | Ionic solvents | [Amim]Cl | Solution polymerization at 70 °C, 2 h |
| Tunicate cellulose | Alkali aqueous | Alkali/urea | Polymerization at −12 to −10 °C, 5–10 min |
| Cotton linter | systems | Alkali/thiourea | Polymerization at −5 °C, 2–10 min |
| Carboxymethylcellulose | Alkali aqueous | H2O | Solution polymerization, in situ polymerization |
| (CMC) | systems | DCM/DMSO | Solution polymerization, in situ polymerization |
| Methyl cellulose (MC) | Polar solvents | H2O | Solution polymerization, cryogenic treatment |
| Hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) | Polar solvents | H2O/ethanol | Solution polymerization, inverse-phase suspension polymerization |
| Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose | Polar solvents | Acetone/ H2O | Chemical crosslinking |
NMMO, N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide; LiCl/DMAc, lithium chloride/dimethylacetamide; [Amim]Cl, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride; H2O, water; DCM/DMSO, dichloromethane/dimethyl sulfoxide.
Figure 7Tissue generation from cell to organ; cell (a), scaffold (b), bioactive factors (c), tissue engineering construct (d), and synthetic organ (e).
Design parameters consideration and characterization of hydrogel scaffolds for electro-active tissues.
| Parameters | The Study Significance for Tissue Engineering | Instrument/Test Method | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular structures | To know the formation of hydrogel through investigating functional group reaction and intermolecular bonding. | Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy | [ |
| Morphologies | To justify suitability of hydrogel for cell adhesion by examining the mechanical toughness of hydrogel. | Scanning electron | [ |
| Polymer Morphology | To understand suitability of hydrogel for adhesivity to cells by studying the crystalline nature of polymeric hydrogels. | X-ray diffraction (XRD) | [ |
| Cross polarization | Enables to know local magnetic fields around atomic nuclei/magnetic angle spinning by examining the molecular identity and structure. | Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) | [ |
| Thermal stability | To Establish a connection between temperatures decomposition properties of substances through weight loss by studying the thermal property of the material. | Thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis | [ |
| Thermal properties | To investigate the correlation between temperature and particular physical properties of the materials to use an aqueous phase diagram and the study of material physicochemical parameters in a composite formation. | Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) | [ |
| Swelling kinetics | Control of the most efficient way to transfer nutrients to cells and absorb wound exudates for rapid wound healing. The swelling properties can be used to detect batch-to-batch variations and consistency in hydrogel fabrication properties, as well as to determine whether the hydrogel mechanics are changing over time. | Soaking and swelling ratio calculation | [ |
| Hydrophility | Enables to know the number of active hydrophilic groups. | Contact angle measurement by drop-shape analyzer | [ |
| Electrical conductivities | Capable of delivering the electrical stimulation of nerve cells by measuring the electrical conductivity of scaffold. | Four-probe method, two-point probe, insulation resistance tester | [ |
| Electrical and dielectric investigations | To investigate the correlation between temperature and electrical conductivity properties of the materials. | Broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS-40) | [ |
| Electro mechanical properties | To simulate electrical properties of nerve cell by studying the dielectric behavior of gel through actuation test. | Laser displacement sensor | [ |
| Mechanical properties | The durability and stability of the material in culture influence cellular mechanotransduction, which has consequences for cellular behaviors such as spreading, migration, and stem cell differentiation. It is investigated by using stress–strain measurements, elastic modulus, break elongation, and tensile strength. | Tensile strength tester | [ |
| Degradation kinetics | Understanding culture stability and biophysical properties such as hydrogel elastic modulus are made possible with the degradation kinetics analysis. Changes in mechanics and swelling that may affect cell behaviors such as motility, spreading, and traction force generation is correlated with degradation kinetics. Stability to a certain timescales is useful even for degradable hydrogels mechanical and or enzymatic disruption may require in isolating cells from hydrogels that require kinetic degradation analysis. | Buffer degradation profile, changes in mechanical properties | [ |
| Antimicrobial activity | Enables us to understand tissue infections through bacterial surface adhesion and subsequent colonization. | The agar plate method | [ |
| Purity | Rather than extracting cells for analysis, some hydrogel studies will require in-situ cell imaging to visualize cells and biomolecules in hydrogels, necessitating knowledge of hydrogel transparency. Neat hydrogel has a high degree of transparency. | UV–Vis Spectroscopy | [ |
| Porosity | Influence nutrient flux throughout the matrix is studied by the measurement of the diffusion of fluorescently tagged polymers entrapped within the hydrogel. The ability of hydrogel to allow nutrients, oxygen, and metabolic products to diffuse easily into their matrices need to be studied. | SEM, Fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP), DNA electrophoresis | [ |
| Self-healing activity | Considering the strong penetrability to biological systems, examining the reversible melting process and recrystallization under heating and cooling cycle of hydrogel is essential. | Healing efficiency calculation by tracking optical microscopy. | [ |
| Electro stimulated Cell Culture | To examine cell viability through electro stimulating potentials | Fluorescence staining and a MTT assay. | [ |
| Animal Experiments | The electro-active hydrogels combined with electrical fields, mimicking the electro-physiological environment in native tissues for proof of concept in skin tissue regeneration. | in vitro biological evaluation | [ |
Conductivity of human tissue (Siemens per meter (Sm−1); copied from Reference [85].
| Tissues | Sm−1 | Tissues | Sm−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebellum | 0.10 | Pancreas | 0.35 |
| C.S.F. | 2.00 | Prostate | 0.40 |
| Cornea | 0.40 | Small intestine | 0.50 |
| Eye humor | 1.50 | Spleen | 0.10 |
| Grey matter | 0.10 | Stomach | 0.50 |
| Hypothalamus | 0.08 | Stomach contents | 0.35 |
| Eye lens | 0.25 | Tendon | 0.30 |
| Pineal body | 0.08 | Testis | 0.35 |
| Pituitary | 0.08 | Thyroid gland | 0.50 |
| Salivary gland | 0.35 | Trachea | 0.35 |
| Thalamus | 0.08 | Urine | 0.70 |
| Tongue | 0.30 | Blood | 0.70 |
| White matter | 0.06 | Cortical bone | 0.02 |
| Adrenals | 0.35 | Bone marrow | 0.06 |
| Bladder | 0.20 | Cartilage | 0.18 |
| Large intestine | 0.10 | Fat | 0.04 |
| Duodenum | 0.50 | Muscle | 0.35 |
| Esophagus | 0.50 | Nerve (Spinal cord) | 0.03 |
| Bile | 1.40 | Skin | 0.10 |
| Gall bladder | 0.20 | Tooth | 0.02 |
| Heart | 0.10 | Ligament | 0.30 |
Advantages and disadvantages of different design strategies for preparing conductive hydrogels (copied from Reference [87]).
| Design Strategies | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| In situ polymerization |
Barrier-free preparation Uniform polymerization |
Potentially cytotoxic unreactive oxidants and monomers Need for chemical synthesis process design |
| Post-polymerization |
Adding conductive materials to synthesized hydrogels Possibility of the conductive coating method |
Cytotoxic unreactive oxidants and monomers Additional polymerization step |
| Composite strategies |
Adjustable conductivity No cytotoxic unreactive oxidants or monomers |
Non-uniform additive distribution Conductive additive toxicity |
Preparation techniques of cellulosic-based conductive hydrogel.
| Hydrogel Features | Method of Crosslinking | Hydrogel Material | Conductivity (S/m) | (Potential) Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electro-active | Composite strategies | rBC/PPy and rBC/PPy/CNT | 6.2 × 10−2 | Cell proliferation | [ |
| Conductive | Post-Polymerization | MCC/PPy | 0.783 | Electrochemical biosensors, electro-stimulated controlled drug release, and neural prosthetics | [ |
| Conductive, self-healing, and strain- and thermal-sensitive performance | In situ polymerization | PAA-CMC-Al3+ | 162 | Flexible and wearable temperature-sensing devices | [ |
| Self-healing, shape memory, and biocompatible | Composite strategies | CNCs-ABA | 3.8 × 10−2 | Strain sensors | [ |
| Ultra-stretchable, tough, anti-freezing, and conductive | Composite strategies via graft polymerization | HPMC-g-P (AN-co-AM) | 1.54 | Strain Sensor | [ |
| Transparent, anti-freezing, and ionic conductive | Chemical crosslinking | CCHs | 2.37 | Sensor | [ |
| Thermally stable, crystalline, and electroactive | Composite strategies | Polyvinyl alcohol cellulose (PC) | Actuator | [ | |
| Anisotropic and conductive, with high water content | Composite strategies | BC-PEDOT/ PSS | Scaffolds, implantable biosensors, and smart soft electronic devices | [ | |
| Tough, stretchable, self-adhesive, self-healing, and strain-sensitive | In situ polymerization | TA@CNCs | Conductivity is proved by light emitting diode | Wearable electronic sensors and healthcare monitoring | [ |
| Electroactive and ultrafast for electro-mechanical response | Post-polymerization | Cellulose-based all-hydrogel artificial muscles membrane. | 0.83–2.49 | Transportation of nerve impulses from human muscle | [ |