| Literature DB >> 35323225 |
Abstract
The selection of restorative materials with regard to the longevity and durability of a restoration is of crucial importance for daily dental practice and requires that the degradation of the material in the oral environment can be assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which the mechanical properties of four (Esthet X, Ceram X, Filtek Supreme XT, and Filtek Supreme XT flow) resin-based composites (RBCs) alter during storage in saliva substitutes (artificial saliva) for 24 h and 28 days and in the context of simulated, more aggressive clinical conditions, including cycles exposure to de- and remineralization, alcohol, or salivary enzymes. For this purpose, flexural strength and modulus were determined in a three-point bending test (n = 20) followed by Weibull analysis, while quasi-static behavior was evaluated by instrumented indentation techniques. Degradation occurred in all RBCs and all aging protocols and was quantifiable at both macroscopic and microscopic levels. The postulated stabilizing effect on degradation through the incorporation of urethane-based co-monomers into the organic matrix or a higher filler loading is refuted. Even though modern RBCs show high clinical survival rates, biodegradation remains an issue that needs to be addressed.Entities:
Keywords: aging; instrumented indentation; resin-based composites; three-point bending
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323225 PMCID: PMC8954671 DOI: 10.3390/jfb13010025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Analyzed RBCs: abbreviation (code), brand (LOT), manufacturer, and composition, as indicated by the manufacturer. The shade A3 was chosen for all RBCs.
| Code | Material/LOT | Manufacturer | Monomer | Filler | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composition | wt/vol% | ||||
| EX | Esthet X | Dentsply | Bis-GMA, Bis-EMA, TEGDMA | SiO2, BaO–F–Al2O3–B2O3–SiO2 | 77/60 |
| CX | Ceram X | Dentsply | Bis-EMA, DM | Ormocer, BaO–Al2O3–B2O3–SiO2 | 76/57 |
| FSXT | Filtek Supreme XT | 3M | Bis-GMA, Bis-EMA, UDMA, TEGDMA | SiO2, ZrO2 | 78.5/59.5 |
| FSXT_F | Filtek Supreme XT flow, 20080815 | 3M | Bis-GMA, Bis-EMA, TEGDMA | SiO2, ZrO2 | 65/55 |
Abbreviations: DM = diemethacrylate; SiO2 = silicon oxide (silica); ZrO2 = zirconium oxide; BaO–F–Al2O3–B2O3–SiO2 = barium–fluoro–alumino–boro–silicate glass; and ormocer = organically modified ceramic.
Figure 1Schematic representation of the storage conditions and study design. With a number of 5 storage conditions and 4 materials, the total analyzed group number was 20.
Three-point bending test results for the reference storage (24 h, artificial saliva): mean and standard deviation for the flexural strength, FS and flexural modulus, E; data are arranged in ascending order of FS. Superscript letters designate groups without significant differences for FS and E data; Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) post hoc test (α = 0.05).
| RBC | FS, MPa | E, GPa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| CX | 99.3 a | 11.0 | 6.2 b | 0.5 |
| EX | 107.8 ab | 11.2 | 7.1 c | 0.7 |
| FSXT_F | 117.2 b | 9.4 | 5.3 a | 0.6 |
| FSXT | 136.0 c | 20.4 | 8.4 d | 0.9 |
Figure 2Three-point bending test: variation of (a) flexural strength and (b) flexural modulus with the aging method and analyzed material; (c) effect strength (ηP2) of the parameters RBC and aging method as well as their interaction term on FS and E (p < 0.001).
Parameters of the Weibull statistic as a function of RBCs and immersion conditions (m, Weibull parameter, SE = standard error; and R2 = coefficient of determination). The 95% confidence interval is defined as 1.96 × SE.
| RBC | Storage | Weibull Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | m | SE | ||
| EX | Saliva 24 h | 0.88 | 11.56 | 1.00 |
| Saliva 28 days | 0.95 | 10.84 | 0.59 | |
| De-/remineralization | 0.96 | 6.71 | 0.30 | |
| Alcohol | 0.96 | 7.44 | 0.36 | |
| Lysozyme | 0.95 | 7.61 | 0.41 | |
| CX | Saliva 24 h | 0.99 | 10.83 | 0.38 |
| Saliva 28 days | 1.00 | 3.99 | 0.20 | |
| De-/remineralization | 0.94 | 5.01 | 0.30 | |
| Alcohol | 0.90 | 8.76 | 0.69 | |
| Lysozyme | 0.95 | 4.27 | 0.22 | |
| FSXT | Saliva 24 h | 0.98 | 7.69 | 0.27 |
| Saliva 28 days | 0.98 | 6.88 | 0.26 | |
| De-/remineralization | 0.98 | 5.13 | 0.18 | |
| Alcohol | 0.95 | 5.09 | 0.28 | |
| Lysozyme | 0.98 | 4.89 | 0.18 | |
| FSXT_F | Saliva 24 h | 0.91 | 13.69 | 1.03 |
| Saliva 28 days | 0.98 | 15.90 | 0.56 | |
| De-/remineralization | 0.96 | 11.59 | 0.57 | |
| Alcohol | 0.97 | 7.53 | 0.30 | |
| Lysozyme | 0.85 | 6.55 | 0.64 | |
Figure 3Weibull plot representing the empirical cumulative distribution function of strength data. Linear regression was used to numerically assess goodness of fit and estimate the parameters of the Weibull distribution, as summarized below in Table 3. (a) EX; (b) CX; (c) FSXT; and (d) FSXT_F.
Figure 4Quasi-static parameters measured in an instrumented indentation test (IIT) as a function of material and aging conditions: (a) universal hardness; (b) Vickers hardness; (c) indentation modulus, (d) creep; and (e) effect strength (ηP2) of the parameters RBC and aging method as well as their interaction term on measured properties (p < 0.001).