| Literature DB >> 35323223 |
Polina Tyubaeva1,2, Ivetta Varyan1,2, Alexey Krivandin2, Olga Shatalova2, Svetlana Karpova2, Anton Lobanov1,2, Anatoly Olkhov1,2, Anatoly Popov1,2.
Abstract
The comparison of the effect of porphyrins of natural and synthetic origin containing the same metal atom on the structure and properties of the semi-crystalline polymer matrix is of current concern. A large number of modifying additives and biodegradable polymers for biomedical purposes, composed of poly(-3-hydroxybutyrate)-porphyrin, are of particular interest because of the combination of their unique properties. The objective of this work are electrospun fibrous material based on poly(-3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), hemin (Hmi), and tetraphenylporphyrin with iron (Fe(TPP)Cl). The structure of these new materials was investigated by methods such as optical and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, Electron paramagnetic resonance method, and Differential scanning calorimetry. The properties of the electrospun materials were analyzed by mechanical and biological tests, and the wetting contact angle was measured. In this work, it was found that even small concentrations of porphyrin can increase the antimicrobial properties by 12 times, improve the physical and mechanical properties by at least 3.5 times, and vary hydrophobicity by at least 5%. At the same time, additives similar in the structure had an oppositely directed effect on the supramolecular structure, the composition of the crystalline, and the amorphous phases. The article considers assumptions about the nature of such differences due to the influence of Hmi and Fe(TPP)Cl) on the macromolecular and fibrous structure of PHB.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial effect; electrospun fibrous materials; hemin; molecular mobility; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate); porphyrin complex; supramolecular structure; tetraphenylporphyrin with iron
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323223 PMCID: PMC8955504 DOI: 10.3390/jfb13010023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Structural formulas of PHB (a) [31], where * is the designation of the chiral carbon atom, Hmi (b) [31], Fe(TPP)Cl (c).
Figure 2The microphotographs of PHB with different content of Hmi [31]: 1% wt. (a), 3% wt. (b) and 5% wt. (c) and Fe(TPP)Cl: 1% wt. (d), 3% wt. (e) and 5% wt. (f).
Average values of the characteristics of the fibrous layer of PHB-Hmi and PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl composites.
| Sample | Concentration of Additive, % | Density, g/cm3 | Average Diameter, µm | Porosity, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHB | 0 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 3.50 ± 0.08 | 80 ± 2.0 |
| PHB-Hmi | 1 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 2.06 ± 0.07 | 92 ± 1.5 |
| PHB-Hmi | 3 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.77 ± 0.04 | 92 ± 1.5 |
| PHB-Hmi | 5 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 1.77 ± 0.04 | 94 ± 1.2 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 1 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 2.07 ± 0.07 | 93 ± 1.4 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 3 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 3.55 ± 0.04 | 95 ± 1.2 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 4 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 3.54 ± 0.04 | 89 ± 1.2 |
Figure 3The SEM microphotograph of PHB electrospun material.
Figure 4The microphotographs of PHB with a different content of Hmi: 1% wt. (A), 3% wt. (B) and 5% wt. (C) and Fe(TPP)Cl: 1% wt. (D), 3% wt. (E) and 5% wt. (F).
Figure 5Dependence of the degree of crystallinity (a) and average sizes of PHB crystallites L (b) on the amount of porphyrin according to X-ray diffraction analysis for PHB-Hmi (blue) and PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl (orange).
Figure 6Dependence of the correlation time of the spin robe TEMPO in the structure of the samples (a) and the concentration of the spin probe in relation to the mass of the material’s sample (b) on the amount of porphyrin according to EPR analysis for PHB-Hmi (blue) and PHB0-Fe(TPP)Cl (orange).
Results of the DCS analysis, where χ—crystallinity degree Δ ± 2.5%, ∆H – melting enthalpy Δ ± 2.5%, Tm—melting temperature Δ ± 2%.
| Sample | Concentration of Additive, % | First Heating Run | Second Heating Run | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tm, °C | ΔH, J/g | Tm, °C | ΔH, J/g | ||||
| PHB | 0 | 175 | 93.1 | 65.2 | 170 | 90.8 | 63.9 |
| PHB-Hmi | 1 | 172 | 81.8 | 57.0 | 168 | 78.7 | 54.9 |
| PHB-Hmi | 3 | 173 | 77.8 | 53.1 | 170 | 75.4 | 51.5 |
| PHB-Hmi | 5 | 174 | 75.3 | 50.4 | 170 | 72.7 | 48.6 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 1 | 170 | 92.9 | 65.5 | 148 | 67.4 | 41.5 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 3 | 169 | 96.8 | 68.3 | 157 | 73.2 | 51.6 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 5 | 169 | 119.0 | 84.5 | 156 | 76.3 | 53.7 |
Figure 7Dependence of the degree of crystallinity of samples on the amount of porphyrin according to DSC analysis for PHB-Hmi (blue line) and PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl (orange line) and X-ray diffraction analysis for PHB-Hmi (blue dots) and PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl (orange dots).
Results of the mechanical analysis.
| Sample | Concentration of Additive, % | Tensile Strength, MPa | Elongation at Break, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHB | 0 | 1.7 | 3.6 |
| PHB-Hmi | 1 | 0.7 | 4.7 |
| PHB-Hmi | 3 | 1.9 | 4.7 |
| PHB-Hmi | 5 | 5.5 | 6.1 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 1 | 2.1 | 3.5 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 3 | 1.6 | 3.5 |
| PHB-Fe(TPP)Cl | 5 | 1.4 | 3.6 |
Figure 8Contact wetting angles of the fibrous materials with a different amount of additives.
Results of the biological analysis.
| Test Culture | Initial Test Culture, CFU/mL | Sample, CFU/mL | Control, CFU/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHB with 3% wt. Hmi | |||
| 2.1 × 104 | 1.8 × 103 | 8.6 × 103 | |
| 2.0 × 104 | <1 × 102 | 9.8 × 103 | |
|
| 2.0 × 104 | 2.1 × 103 | 8.1 × 103 |
|
| |||
| 2.0 × 104 | 1.8 × 103 | 4.0 × 103 | |
| 2.0 × 104 | <1 × 102 | 9.0 × 103 | |
|
| 2.2 × 104 | 1.0 × 103 | 6.0 × 103 |