Thomas R Godec1, Daniel I Bromage2, Mar Pujades-Rodriguez3, Antonio Cannatà2, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo4,5,6, Spiros Denaxas4,5,6, Harry Hemingway4,5,6, Ajay M Shah2, Derek M Yellon7, Theresa A McDonagh2. 1. Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, James Black Centre, 125 Coldharbour Lane, London, SE5 9NU, UK. 3. Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 4. Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK. 5. Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK. 6. The National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK. 7. The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Abstract
AIM: The optimal strategy for diabetes control in patients with heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Metformin, a guideline-recommended therapy for patients with chronic HF and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with reduced mortality and HF hospitalizations. However, worse outcomes have been reported when used at the time of MI. We compared outcomes of patients with T2DM and HF of ischaemic aetiology according to antidiabetic treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used linked data from primary care, hospital admissions, and death registries for 4.7 million inhabitants in England, as part of the CALIBER resource. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint and all-cause mortality. To evaluate the effect of temporal changes in diabetes treatment, antidiabetic medication was included as time-dependent covariates in survival analyses. The study included 1172 patients with T2DM and prior MI and incident HF between 3 January 1998 and 26 February 2010. Five hundred and ninety-six patients had the primary outcome over median follow-up of 2.53 (IQR: 0.98-4.92) years. Adjusted analyses showed a reduced hazard of the composite endpoint for exposure to all antidiabetic medication with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.59], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80), and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.43-0.65), respectively. A similar effect was seen for all-cause mortality [HRs of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.35-0.52), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.27-0.43), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: When considering changes in antidiabetic treatment over time, all drug classes were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization.
AIM: The optimal strategy for diabetes control in patients with heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Metformin, a guideline-recommended therapy for patients with chronic HF and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with reduced mortality and HF hospitalizations. However, worse outcomes have been reported when used at the time of MI. We compared outcomes of patients with T2DM and HF of ischaemic aetiology according to antidiabetic treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used linked data from primary care, hospital admissions, and death registries for 4.7 million inhabitants in England, as part of the CALIBER resource. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint and all-cause mortality. To evaluate the effect of temporal changes in diabetes treatment, antidiabetic medication was included as time-dependent covariates in survival analyses. The study included 1172 patients with T2DM and prior MI and incident HF between 3 January 1998 and 26 February 2010. Five hundred and ninety-six patients had the primary outcome over median follow-up of 2.53 (IQR: 0.98-4.92) years. Adjusted analyses showed a reduced hazard of the composite endpoint for exposure to all antidiabetic medication with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.59], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80), and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.43-0.65), respectively. A similar effect was seen for all-cause mortality [HRs of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.35-0.52), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.27-0.43), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: When considering changes in antidiabetic treatment over time, all drug classes were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization.
Authors: Michael R MacDonald; Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; James D Lewsey; Sai Bhagra; Pardeep S Jhund; Mark C Petrie; John J V McMurray; John R Petrie; Finlay A McAlister Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Chris P H Lexis; Wouter G Wieringa; Bart Hiemstra; Vincent M van Deursen; Erik Lipsic; Pim van der Harst; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Iwan C C van der Horst Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.727
Authors: Daniel I Bromage; Tom R Godec; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; S Denaxas; Harry Hemingway; Derek M Yellon Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 8.949
Authors: Thomas R Godec; Daniel I Bromage; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Antonio Cannatà; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Spiros Denaxas; Harry Hemingway; Ajay M Shah; Derek M Yellon; Theresa A McDonagh Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2022-03-23
Authors: Spiros Denaxas; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Kenan Direk; Natalie K Fitzpatrick; Ghazaleh Fatemifar; Amitava Banerjee; Richard J B Dobson; Laurence J Howe; Valerie Kuan; R Tom Lumbers; Laura Pasea; Riyaz S Patel; Anoop D Shah; Aroon D Hingorani; Cathie Sudlow; Harry Hemingway Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Anoop Dinesh Shah; Claudia Langenberg; Eleni Rapsomaniki; Spiros Denaxas; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Chris P Gale; John Deanfield; Liam Smeeth; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Thomas R Godec; Daniel I Bromage; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Antonio Cannatà; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Spiros Denaxas; Harry Hemingway; Ajay M Shah; Derek M Yellon; Theresa A McDonagh Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2022-03-23