| Literature DB >> 35322566 |
Meng-Rui Li1,2,3,4, Zi-Jun Sun1,2,3,4, Dong-Yuan Chang1,2,3,4, Xiao-Juan Yu1,2,3,4, Su-Xia Wang1,2,3,4, Min Chen1,2,3,4, Ming-Hui Zhao1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although extensive efforts have been paid to identify reliable predictors for renal outcomes of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there are still only a limited number of predictive factors for DKD progression. Increasing evidence reported the role of the overactivated complement system in the pathogenesis of DKD. Whether renal complement depositions are associated with renal outcomes of DKD in T2DM is of interest.Entities:
Keywords: C3; complement; diabetic kidney disease; prognosis; renal pathology; 糖尿病肾病; 肾脏病理; 补体; 预后
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35322566 PMCID: PMC9060041 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes ISSN: 1753-0407 Impact factor: 4.530
FIGURE 1Flow chart of patient recruitment. DKD, diabetic kidney disease; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus
General data of DKD patients
| Variables | Total patients ( |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 51.3 ± 11.6 |
| Male, | 163 (76.5) |
| Duration of DM, months | 120 (60, 186) |
| Proteinuria, g/24 h (0–0.15) | 3.8 (2.0, 7.3) |
| Hematuria, | 122 (57.3) |
| Serum albumin, g/L (40–55) | 33.4 ± 6.1 |
| Serum creatinine, μmol/L (44–133) | 180.5 (108.9, 310.4) |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 35.6 (19.2, 60.3) |
| Renal insufficiency, | 160 (75.1) |
| HbA1c, % (4–6) | 7.1 ± 1.7 |
| DR, | 148 (69.5) |
| TG, mmol/L (3.4–5.2) | 1.77 (1.27, 2.74) |
| LDL, mmol/L (2.1–3.1) | 2.89 ± 1.17 |
| HDL, mmol/L (0.9–1.4) | 0.98 ± 0.28 |
| ESR, mm/1 h (0–15) | 50.3 ± 31.7 |
| CRP, mg/L (0–8) | 1.76 (0.78, 4.09) |
| Serum C3, g/L (0.6–1.5) | 0.89 ± 0.17 |
Abbreviations: CRP, C‐reactive protein; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; DR, diabetic retinopathy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.
Pathological characteristics of DKD patients
| Total patients ( | |
|---|---|
| Light microscopy | |
| Glomerular class, | |
| class I/class II/class III/class IV | 8 (3.8)/57 (26.8)/122 (57.3) /26 (12.2) |
| IFTA, | |
| 0/1/2/3 | 0 (0)/61 (28.6)/83 (39.0)/69 (32.4) |
| Interstitial inflammation, | |
| 0/1/2 | 0 (0)/82 (38.5)/131 (61.5) |
| Vascular lesions | |
| 0/1 | 1 (0.5)/212 (99.5) |
| Immunofluorescence | |
| IgG deposition, | 174 (81.7) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 39/88/70/16/0 |
| IgM deposition, | 129 (60.6) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 84/46/50/32/1 |
| IgA deposition, | 57 (26.8) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 156/50/7/0/0 |
| C3c deposition, | 133 (62.4) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 80/45/37/47/4 |
| C1q deposition, | 45 (21.1) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 168/24/13/8/0 |
| Albumin deposition, | 172 (80.8) |
| Scale 0/1+/2+/3+/4+ | 41/78/75/19/0 |
Abbreviations: DKD, diabetic kidney disease; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy.
Potential prognostic factors for renal outcomes determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis in DKD patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| sex (male) | 1.161 (0.722, 1.865) | .538 | ||
| Age ≥ 60 years (yes vs. no) | 1.059 (0.652, 1.720) | .816 | ||
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 1.171 (1.126, 1.218) |
| 1.134 (1.079, 1.191) |
|
| Hematuria (yes vs. no) | 1.508 (0.991, 2.295) | .055 | ||
| eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 (yes vs. no) | 5.569 (2.795, 11.096) |
| ||
| HbA1c (%) | 0.828 (0.707, 0.970) |
| ||
| DR (yes vs. no) | 2.280 (1.380, 3.766) |
| ||
| TG, mmol/L | 0.989 (0.869, 1.127) | .873 | ||
| LDL, mmol/L | 1.208 (1.015, 1.438) |
| ||
| HDL, mmol/L | 0.710 (0.347, 1.453) | .349 | ||
| ESR > 15 mm/1h (yes vs. no) | 3.122 (1.433, 6.800) |
| ||
| CRP > 8 mg/L (yes vs. no) | 1.327 (0.679, 2.592) | .408 | ||
| Serum C3 (g/L) | 0.309 (0.091, 1.054) | .061 | ||
| Glomerular class (III and IV vs. I and II) | 3.196 (1.843, 5.543) |
| ||
| IFTA (score 2 and 3 vs. 0 and 1) | 4.906 (2.676, 8.994) |
| 3.925 (1.855, 8.304) |
|
| Interstitial inflammation (score 2 vs. 0 and 1) | 2.894 (1.823, 4.595) |
| ||
| IgG deposition (per +) | 1.184 (0.937, 1.496) | .157 | ||
| IgM deposition (per +) | 1.181 (0.990, 1.407) | .064 | ||
| IgA deposition (per +) | 0.803 (0.529, 1.219) | .302 | ||
| C3c deposition (per +) | 1.452 (1.234, 1.708) |
| 1.299 (1.073, 1.573) |
|
| C1q deposition (per +) | 1.417 (1.156, 1.738) |
| ||
| Albumin deposition (per +) | 1.218 (0.970, 1.528) | .089 | ||
Note: Bold values indicates the p values less than .05 were considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; DR, diabetic retinopathy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; HR, hazard ratio; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.
FIGURE 2Kaplan–Meier survival curve in DKD patients with or without C3c deposition. DKD, diabetic kidney disease