Literature DB >> 35321132

Is There a Sex Difference in Trunk Neuromuscular Control among Recreational Athletes during Cutting Maneuvers?

Guillaume Mornieux1, Dominic Gehring1, Albert Gollhofer1.   

Abstract

Trunk motion is most likely to influence knee joint injury risk, but little is known about sex-related differences in trunk neuromuscular control during changes of direction. The purpose of the present study was to test whether differences in trunk control between males and females during changes of direction exist. Twelve female and 12 male recreational athletes (with at least 10 years of experience in team sport) performed unanticipated changes of direction with 30° and 60° cut angles, while 3D trunk and leg kinematics, ground reaction forces and trunk muscles electromyography were recorded. Trunk kinematics at the time of peak knee abduction moment and directed co-contraction ratios for trunk muscles during the pre-activation and weight acceptance phases were determined. None of the trunk kinematics and co-contraction ratio variables, nor peak knee abduction moment differed between sexes. Compared to the 30° cut, trunk lateral flexion remained unchanged and trunk external rotation was reduced (p < 0.001; η²p (partial eta squared for effect size) = 0.78), while peak knee abduction moment was increased (p < 0.001; η²p = 0.84) at 60°. The sharper cutting angle induced muscle co-contraction during the pre-activation directed less towards trunk flexors (p < 0.01; η²p = 0.27) but more towards trunk medial flexors and rotators opposite to the movement direction (p < 0.001; η²p > 0.46). However, muscle co-contraction during the weight acceptance phase remained comparable between 30° and 60°. The lack of sex-related differences in trunk control does not explain knee joint injury risk discrepancies between sexes during changes of direction. Trunk neuromuscular strategies during sharper cutting angles revealed the importance of external oblique muscles to maintain trunk lateral flexion at the expense of trunk rotation. This provides new information for trunk strength training purposes for athletes performing changes of direction. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core stability; anterior cruciate ligament; co-contraction; knee abduction moment; trunk lateral flexion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35321132      PMCID: PMC8488842          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2021.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  38 in total

1.  Effects of abdominal stabilization maneuvers on the control of spine motion and stability against sudden trunk perturbations.

Authors:  Francisco J Vera-Garcia; José L L Elvira; Stephen H M Brown; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  The effects of core muscle activation on dynamic trunk position and knee abduction moments: implications for ACL injury.

Authors:  Steve T Jamison; Michael P McNally; Laura C Schmitt; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Trunk position modulates anterior cruciate ligament forces and strains during a single-leg squat.

Authors:  Anthony S Kulas; Tibor Hortobágyi; Paul DeVita
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Influence of Gender on Trunk and Lower Limb Biomechanics during Lateral Movements.

Authors:  E Weltin; G Mornieux; A Gollhofer
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.674

5.  Changes in muscle activation following balance and technique training and a season of Australian football.

Authors:  C J Donnelly; B C Elliott; T L A Doyle; C F Finch; A R Dempsey; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.319

6.  Male and female soccer players exhibit different knee joint mechanics during pre-planned change of direction.

Authors:  Christopher Thomas; Thomas Dos'Santos; Paul Comfort; Paul A Jones
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.832

7.  By failing to prepare, you are preparing your anterior cruciate ligament to fail.

Authors:  Jonathan M D Staynor; Jacqueline A Alderson; Sean Byrne; Marcel Rossi; Cyril J Donnelly
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Trunk and hip biomechanics influence anterior cruciate loading mechanisms in physically active participants.

Authors:  Barnett Frank; David R Bell; Marc F Norcross; J Troy Blackburn; Benjamin M Goerger; Darin A Padua
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effect of gender on trunk and pelvis control during lateral movements with perturbed landing.

Authors:  Elmar Weltin; Albert Gollhofer; Guillaume Mornieux
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Effects of perturbations to balance on neuromechanics of fast changes in direction during locomotion.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Priscila Brito Silva; Morten Enemark Lund; Leonardo Gizzi; Dario Farina; Uwe Gustav Kersting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.