Literature DB >> 23884306

Trunk and hip biomechanics influence anterior cruciate loading mechanisms in physically active participants.

Barnett Frank1, David R Bell, Marc F Norcross, J Troy Blackburn, Benjamin M Goerger, Darin A Padua.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive trunk motion and deficits in neuromuscular control (NMC) of the lumbopelvic hip complex are risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the relationship between trunk motion, NMC of the lumbopelvic hip complex, and triplanar knee loads during a sidestep cutting task has not been examined.
PURPOSE: To determine if there is an association between multiplanar trunk motion, NMC of the lumbopelvic hip complex, and triplanar knee loads with ACL injury during a sidestep cutting task. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: The hip and knee biomechanics and trunk motion of 30 participants (15 male, 15 female) were analyzed during a sidestep cutting task using an optoelectric camera system interfaced to a force plate. Trunk and lower extremity biomechanics were calculated from the kinematic and ground-reaction force data during the first 50% of the stance time during the cutting task. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between trunk and lower extremity biomechanics. Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to determine the amount of variance in triplanar knee loading explained by trunk motion and hip moments.
RESULTS: A greater internal knee varus moment (mean, 0.11 ± 0.12 N·m/kg*m) was associated with less transverse-plane trunk rotation away from the stance limb (mean, 20.25° ± 4.42°; r = -0.46, P = .011) and a greater internal hip adduction moment (mean, 0.33 ± 0.25 N·m/kg*m; r = 0.83, P < .05). A greater internal knee external rotation moment (mean, 0.11 ± 0.08 N·m/kg*m) was associated with a greater forward trunk flexion (mean, 7.62° ± 5.28°; r = 0.42, P = .020) and a greater hip internal rotation moment (mean, 0.15 ± 0.16 N·m/kg*m; r = 0.59, P = .001). Trunk rotation and hip adduction moment explained 81% (P < .05) of the variance in knee varus moment. Trunk flexion and hip internal rotation moment explained 48% (P < .05) of the variance in knee external rotation moment.
CONCLUSION: Limited trunk rotation displacement toward the new direction of travel and hip adduction moment are associated with an increased internal knee varus moment, while a combined increase in trunk flexion displacement and hip internal rotation moment is associated with a higher internal knee external rotation moment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prevention interventions for ACL injury should encourage trunk rotation toward the new direction of travel and limit excessive trunk flexion while adjusting frontal- and transverse-plane hip NMC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; cutting task; hip biomechanics; joint; knee biomechanics; trunk motion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884306     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513496625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  A Systematic Evaluation of Field-Based Screening Methods for the Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Risk.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Considerations for late stage acl rehabilitation and return to sport to limit re-injury risk and maximize athletic performance.

Authors:  Daniel P Bien; Thomas J Dubuque
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  ACL Injury Prevention: What Does Research Tell Us?

Authors:  Trent Nessler; Linda Denney; Justin Sampley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

5.  Drop-Landing Performance and Knee-Extension Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher M Kuenze; Nathaniel Foot; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  RETURN TO PLAY PROGRESSION FOR RUGBY FOLLOWING INJURY TO THE LOWER EXTREMITY: A CLINICAL COMMENTARY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Michael P Sclafani; Chelseana C Davis
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

7.  Knee abduction moment is predicted by lower gluteus medius force and larger vertical and lateral ground reaction forces during drop vertical jump in female athletes.

Authors:  Ryo Ueno; Alessandro Navacchia; Christopher A DiCesare; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Tomoya Ishida; Harukazu Tohyama; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Greater body mass index and hip abduction muscle strength predict noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female Japanese high school basketball players.

Authors:  Kengo Shimozaki; Junsuke Nakase; Yasushi Takata; Yosuke Shima; Katsuhiko Kitaoka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Influence of Anticipation and Motor-Motor Task Performance on Cutting Biomechanics in Healthy Men.

Authors:  Grant E Norte; Taylor R Frendt; Amanda M Murray; Charles W Armstrong; Thomas J McLoughlin; Luke T Donovan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Hip and Knee Kinematics and Kinetics During Landing Tasks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam S Lepley; Christopher M Kuenze
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.