Literature DB >> 35320451

Effect of near real-time feedback tool in the electronic medical record on protocol compliance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.

William R Hand1, Elaine Kerr2, Riley Chambers2, Alex Ewing3, Vito Cancellaro4.   

Abstract

Implementation of evidence-based medicine has proved difficult across medical fields. Leveraging the electronic medical record may improve clinician compliance to published best practices. Our hypothesis was that the use of a near real-time feedback tool would improve compliance to the protocol steps. In order to test this hypothesis, we performed a retrospective chart review to compare compliance to a proprietary enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without a near real-time feedback tool embedded in the electronic medical record. Deviations to the care pathway were quantified and classified as allowable or as errors of commission, omission, or dose. During the study period, 2625 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. A total of 16,972 protocol steps were evaluated. Complete protocol compliance improved from 10.3 to 61.5% (p < 0.001) with the use of the feedback tool. Individual protocol component compliance increased from 4994/8418 (59.3%) to 7669/8554 (89.7%) (p < 0.001). The near real-time feedback tool reduced the number of cases with every number of deviations (except zero) at p < 0.001. The near real-time feedback tool significantly improved protocol compliance for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Evidence-based medicine; Guideline adherence; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Perioperative care

Year:  2022        PMID: 35320451     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00833-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R Grol; A Hutchinson; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: A clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties.

Authors:  Thomas W Smith; Xuanji Wang; Marc A Singer; Constantine V Godellas; Faaiza T Vaince
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Are Valuable in Pancreas Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Katherine A Morgan; William P Lancaster; Megan L Walters; Stefanie M Owczarski; Carlee A Clark; Julie R McSwain; David B Adams
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study.

Authors:  Alexander Hincker; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Michael Avidan; Penka Candelario; Daniel Helsten
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Digital innovations and emerging technologies for enhanced recovery programmes.

Authors:  F Michard; T J Gan; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Marisa A Ryan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Changing physicians' practices.

Authors:  P J Greco; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol.

Authors:  Timothy E Miller; Julie K Thacker; William D White; Christopher Mantyh; John Migaly; Juying Jin; Anthony M Roche; Eric L Eisenstein; Rex Edwards; Kevin J Anstrom; Richard E Moon; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The Impact of Anesthesia-Influenced Process Measure Compliance on Length of Stay: Results From an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Colorectal Surgery Cohort.

Authors:  Michael C Grant; Claro M Pio Roda; Joseph K Canner; Philip Sommer; Daniel Galante; Deborah Hobson; Susan Gearhart; Christopher L Wu; Elizabeth Wick
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.

Authors:  Zoë Slote Morris; Steven Wooding; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.