Literature DB >> 1588619

Neurophysiological assessment of spinal cord and head injury.

M R Dimitrijevic1, C Y Hsu, W B McKay.   

Abstract

Selected neurophysiologic studies can supplement clinical examination in assessing residual motor function after spinal cord or head injury. The ability of polyelectromyographic recording to detect subclinical suprasegmental control is illustrated in paraplegic patients after spinal cord injury. Excitatory or inhibitory modulation of segmental motor activity in a subpopulation of patients with clinically complete motor paralysis suggests residual connection across the lesion. This observation is consistent with the pathologic finding that complete transection of the spinal cord is rare after spinal cord injury. A preliminary study of motor-evoked potentials also indicates their potential value as an objective measure of the functional status of descending pathways. Neurophysiological assessment of subclinical residual motor function may be useful in understanding the role of suprasegmental input in the manifestation of spasticity, in objectively documenting recovery of function after injury, and may aid in the development of more specific restorative measures. Our limited experience in head-injured patients also suggests the potential usefulness of these tools in supplementing clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1588619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  8 in total

1.  Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans.

Authors:  Claudia A Angeli; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Profiling motor control in spinal cord injury: moving towards individualized therapy and evidence-based care progression.

Authors:  Keith E Tansey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Alexander G Steele; Gerome A Manson; Jony Sheynin; Jeonghoon Oh; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation for Standing after Chronic Complete Paralysis in Humans.

Authors:  Enrico Rejc; Claudia Angeli; Susan Harkema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Muscle Activation Patterns During Movement Attempts in Children With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury: Neurophysiological Assessment of Residual Motor Function Below the Level of Lesion.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Laura Mendez; Natalie Goodrich; Sevda C Aslan; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Spinal cord stimulation for spinal cord injury patients with paralysis: To regain walking and dignity.

Authors:  Sheng-Tzung Tsai; Yu-Chen Chen; Hung-Yu Cheng; Chun-Hsiang Lin; Huan-Chen Lin; Chich-Haung Yang; Chung-Chao Liang; Shin-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2020-08-26

7.  A Brain Motor Control Assessment (BMCA) protocol for upper limb function.

Authors:  Maryam Zoghi; Mary Galea; David Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantitative Evaluation of Post-stroke Spasticity Using Neurophysiological and Radiological Tools: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mi Jin Hong; Jong Bum Park; Yung Jin Lee; Hyeong Tae Kim; Won Chul Lee; Cheol Mog Hwang; Hyun Kyoon Lim; Dong Hyun Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-06-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.