Literature DB >> 35318984

Challenges in Interpreting Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature.

Ann M Bruno1,2, Nathan R Blue1,2.   

Abstract

The field of obstetrics and gynecology is constantly replenished with the newest research findings. In an era of rapidly available study publications, there are a number of challenges to interpreting the obstetrics and gynecology literature. Common pitfalls include the over reliance on the dichotomized P-value, lack of transparency, bias in study reporting, limitations of resources, absence of standardized practices and outcomes in study design, and the rare concerns for data integrity. We review these predominant challenges and their potential solutions, in interpreting the obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35318984      PMCID: PMC9050836          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   1.966


  58 in total

1.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  An introduction to power and sample size estimation.

Authors:  S R Jones; S Carley; M Harrison
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  When predictions don't predict.

Authors:  A L Speirs; R H Asch; S J Silber
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.100

4.  It's All How You "Spin" It: Interpretive Bias in Research Findings in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature.

Authors:  Mark Turrentine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Executive summary of the reVITALize initiative: standardizing obstetric data definitions.

Authors:  M Kathryn Menard; Elliott K Main; Sean M Currigan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Check for publication integrity before misconduct.

Authors:  Andrew Grey; Mark J Bolland; Alison Avenell; Andrew A Klein; C K Gunsalus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

8.  Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Madeline M Rice; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Elizabeth A Thom; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Annette Perez-Delboy; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; Kim A Boggess; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

10.  When "facts" are not facts: what does p value really mean, and how does it deceive us?

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Andrew L Speirs; Sierra Goldsmith; Sherman J Silber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.