Literature DB >> 35317846

RNA-Seq analysis of gene expression in 25 cases of canine lymphoma undergoing CHOP chemotherapy.

Miles W Mee1, Sydney Faulkner1, Geoffrey A Wood2, J Paul Woods3, Dorothee Bienzle2, Brenda L Coomber4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Canine lymphoma, the most common hematological cancer in dogs, shares many molecular and clinical characteristics with human Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The standard treatment for canine lymphoma is "CHOP" multiagent chemotherapy protocol consisting of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin (Hydroxydaunorubicin), Vincristine (Oncovin™), and Prednisone. Approximately 70-85% of patients treated with CHOP achieve clinical remission. However, duration of remission varies and the majority of dogs eventually relapse. To identify possible biomarkers for patients failing to achieve remission, we performed RNA-Seq analysis on 25 cases of canine lymphoma obtained prior the start of their CHOP therapy regime and assessed gene expression associated with patient progression free survival (PFS). DATA DESCRIPTION: The data consists of (1) raw RNA-Seq reads in 75 bp fastq format from fine needle aspirate samples of enlarged lymph nodes from canine patients with naturally occurring lymphoma; (2) Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM) values for each sample; (3) raw transcript counts for each sample; (4) anonymized patient details including PFS; (5) heat map of gene expression and (6) Cox proportional hazard analysis showing significantly expressed genes. These data may be useful for comparative analysis of gene expression in human NHL and analysis of gene expression associated with disease outcome in canine lymphoma.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chemotherapy; Comparative oncology; Dog; Gene expression; Lymphoma; RNA sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35317846      PMCID: PMC8939155          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Objective

Canine lymphoma is the most common haematopoietic neoplasm in dogs [1] and is similar to human non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Both canine and human NHL have similar clinical presentation, molecular biology, therapy, and treatment response [2, 3]. Lymphoma is also common in dogs, and is treated with similar multiagent chemotherapy regimens as human disease yet has a much faster disease progression (time to relapse of 6–8 months is typical [4]) than that seen in NHL. This makes canine lymphoma an attractive comparative oncology model for the most aggressive human NHL cases. The standard treatment is standard in both canine lymphoma and NHL, consisting of a multi-agent chemotherapy protocol of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), often with the addition of rituximab in humans [5]. There is a high initial response rate for canine lymphoma to CHOP of about 70% to 85%. However, the duration of remission varies and the majority of patients will eventually relapse [4, 6]. The failure of many canine lymphoma patients to achieve long term remission has raised interest in developing methods to predict their response to CHOP therapy. While several molecular biomarkers have been proposed [7-9] in general they lack a clear therapeutic target, thus additional research is required. The data provided here may be useful for analysis of gene expression changes related to disease outcome in canine lymphoma, and for comparative analysis of gene expression in human NHL.

Data description

Case enrolment

Dogs with naturally occurring lymphoma, diagnosed by cytology or histology at the Mona Campbell Centre for Animal Cancer, University of Guelph, who had received no prior treatment other than a single injection of prednisone were eligible for this study. No breed, sex or age restrictions were in place, but dogs with other concurrent neoplasms or prior neoplasms including lymphoma were excluded. Lymphomas were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry [10]. Dogs were enrolled with the intention to treat with standard CHOP therapy and were monitored by physical examinations ± diagnostic imaging for a minimum of 6 months to categorize response as complete remission or not by WHO criteria [11]. Dogs lost to follow-up, or not progressed at last check were censored for PFS.

RNA-Seq data generation and processing

Tumor samples were collected by fine needle aspirate and expressed into sterile collection vials containing 1.0 ml of RNAprotect Cell Reagent (Qiagen). Poly A-RNA was isolated from the tissue samples using QIAGEN RNeasy isolation kit and quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The RNA integrity number (RIN) was calculated for each sample using Bioanalyzer analysis. Twenty-five samples with RIN above 9 were selected for sequencing, including 16 immunophenotyped as B-cell lymphoma, three immunophenotyped as T-cell lymphoma, and six patients with missing immunophenotype. The selected samples were sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq platform by the London Regional Genomics Centre, London, ON, Canada. The sequence data were returned in single read 75 bp fastq format. Data Set 1 contains the RNA sequencing results for this publication, which have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE130874 [12]. The RNA-Seq reads were assessed for quality using [13]. The reference genome (CanFam3.1) and gene model (CanFam3.1.88.gtf) were downloaded from Ensembl [14]. The raw fastq reads were aligned to the CanFam3.1 reference sequence and CanFam3.1.88.gtf annotation file using [15]. [16] was used to annotate genes and quantify their expression. Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM) values were calculated using the R package [17] and are available in Data file 1 [12]. Raw transcript counts for expressed genes are available in Data file 2 [12]. Key patient details, including PFS are available in Data file 3 [18]. When we hierarchically clustered and visualized the RNA-Seq data from all sequenced samples, we observed two patient clusters corresponding to samples isolated by separate technicians, suggesting some batch effects existed between the patient clusters (Data file 4 [18]). While there were 1052 genes with unadjusted Cox Proportional Hazard model p-values < 0.05 (Data file 5 [18]), we were unable to confirm their significance in a validation set of cases. Thus, no research publication from this study was feasible. However, we feel the available data may be of use to others who are researching lymphoma in dogs and in humans (see Table 1).
Table 1

Overview of data files/data sets

LabelName of data file/data setFile types(file extension)Data repository and identifier (DOI or accession number)
Data set 1Raw sequence reads for 25 canine lymphoma casesFASTQ files (.fastq.gz)NCBI GEO; https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE130874 [12]
Data file 1FPKM values for expressed genesTSV file (.tsv.gz)NCBI GEO; https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE130874 [12]
Data file 2Raw transcript counts for expressed genesTSV file (.tsv.gz)NCBI GEO; https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE130874 [12]
Data file 3Clinical outcome for 25 canine lymphoma casesTAB file (.tab)Harvard Dataverse; https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PGL3BO [18]
Data file 4Heatmap of gene expressionAdobe Acrobat portable document format file (.pdf)Harvard Dataverse; https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PGL3BO [18]
Data file 5Results of Cox proportional hazard analysis of gene expressionTAB file (.tab)Harvard Dataverse; https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PGL3BO [18]
Overview of data files/data sets

Limitations

This study is limited by the small sample size, and technical issues resulting in batch effects further reducing the statistical power. The lack of complete immunophenotype information for all cases, and the lack of technical replicates (repeat sequencing) are also limitations. The selection of cases to sequence was initially influenced by client decision to treat their dogs with CHOP, and client consent to participate in this study. Recovery of sufficient total RNA of suitable quality from available cases and finances limited the RNA-Seq analysis to 25 samples. All or any of the above may have had unintended and unknown influence on the data obtained.
  16 in total

1.  CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Bertrand Coiffier; Eric Lepage; Josette Briere; Raoul Herbrecht; Hervé Tilly; Reda Bouabdallah; Pierre Morel; Eric Van Den Neste; Gilles Salles; Philippe Gaulard; Felix Reyes; Pierre Lederlin; Christian Gisselbrecht
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluation of factors associated with second remission in dogs with lymphoma undergoing retreatment with a cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy protocol: 95 cases (2000-2007).

Authors:  Andrea B Flory; Kenneth M Rassnick; Hollis N Erb; Laura D Garrett; Nicole C Northrup; Kim A Selting; Brenda S Phillips; Jennifer E Locke; John D Chretin
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis.

Authors:  Alyssa C Frazee; Geo Pertea; Andrew E Jaffe; Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg; Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Prognostic significance of Ki67 and its correlation with mitotic index in dogs with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with 19-week CHOP-based protocol.

Authors:  Oscar R Sierra Matiz; Juliana Santilli; Leticia A Anai; Maria C L Da Silva; Felipe A Sueiro; Júlio L Sequeira; Larissa F Magalhães; Geórgia M Magalhães; Mirela Tinucci Costa; Sabryna G Calazans
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 6.  The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.

Authors:  Steven H Swerdlow; Elias Campo; Stefano A Pileri; Nancy Lee Harris; Harald Stein; Reiner Siebert; Ranjana Advani; Michele Ghielmini; Gilles A Salles; Andrew D Zelenetz; Elaine S Jaffe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Histopathologic classification of 171 cases of canine and feline non-Hodgkin lymphoma according to the WHO.

Authors:  E Vezzali; A L Parodi; P S Marcato; G Bettini
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.613

8.  Outcome and toxicity associated with a dose-intensified, maintenance-free CHOP-based chemotherapy protocol in canine lymphoma: 130 cases.

Authors:  Karin Sorenmo; B Overley; E Krick; T Ferrara; A LaBlanc; F Shofer
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.613

9.  Specific immunotypes of canine T cell lymphoma are associated with different outcomes.

Authors:  Nariman Deravi; Olaf Berke; J Paul Woods; Dorothee Bienzle
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  Ensembl 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Yates; Wasiu Akanni; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Konstantinos Billis; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Carla Cummins; Peter Clapham; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah E Hunt; Sophie H Janacek; Nathan Johnson; Thomas Juettemann; Stephen Keenan; Ilias Lavidas; Fergal J Martin; Thomas Maurel; William McLaren; Daniel N Murphy; Rishi Nag; Michael Nuhn; Anne Parker; Mateus Patricio; Miguel Pignatelli; Matthew Rahtz; Harpreet Singh Riat; Daniel Sheppard; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Alessandro Vullo; Steven P Wilder; Amonida Zadissa; Ewan Birney; Jennifer Harrow; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Giulietta Spudich; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  RNA-Seq analysis of gene expression in 25 cases of canine lymphoma undergoing CHOP chemotherapy.

Authors:  Miles W Mee; Sydney Faulkner; Geoffrey A Wood; J Paul Woods; Dorothee Bienzle; Brenda L Coomber
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-03-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.