Gizem Gül Koç1, Cansu Dağsuyu2, Ali Kokangül1, Filiz Koç3. 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alparslan Turkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey. 3. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Abstract
Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality that adversely affects the activities of daily living. Disease progression in ALS is characterized by loss of function in bulbar, motor, and respiratory parameters. The revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R), which consists of 12 criteria, is used to determine disease effects on each of these functions. While each criterion is equally important when calculating the total ALSFRS-R score, the importance levels of the 12 criteria may vary in clinical practice. In this classical approach, the relationships among the parameters are not considered and the effects of bulbar, spinal, and respiratory dysfunctions on a patient's activities of daily living may be different. Methods: In this study, we aimed to evaluate ALS cases with the ALSFRS-R fuzzy method. Although each subheading in the ALSFRS-R had the same score, the disease score was determined by the fuzzy ALSFRS-R method, based on whether a subheading had priority in management of the disease. While creating the functional rating scale ALSFRS-R approach, fuzzy ALSFRS-R score values were obtained by creating fuzzy models for each main group and integrating the fuzzy model results of each main group into a separate model. Results: In total, 50 patients with definite ALS according to the El Escorial criteria (33 men [66%] and 17 women [34%]; mean age, 58.49±10.01 years) were included in the study. When ALSFRS-R results and fuzzy ALSFRS-R results were compared, the prioritization order of 45 patients increased using the fuzzy ALSFRS-R score, while the prioritization order of five patients remained the same in both evaluations. Conclusion: The approach obtained by using fuzzy membership functions and decision rules, formed in accordance with expert opinion, was applied to the data of 50 patients from a large-scale hospital. In total, 90% of the patients had increased prioritization when using the fuzzy ALSFRS-R scoring method. Our results showed that the fuzzy approach provided more accurate information regarding a patient's condition. Copyright:
Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality that adversely affects the activities of daily living. Disease progression in ALS is characterized by loss of function in bulbar, motor, and respiratory parameters. The revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R), which consists of 12 criteria, is used to determine disease effects on each of these functions. While each criterion is equally important when calculating the total ALSFRS-R score, the importance levels of the 12 criteria may vary in clinical practice. In this classical approach, the relationships among the parameters are not considered and the effects of bulbar, spinal, and respiratory dysfunctions on a patient's activities of daily living may be different. Methods: In this study, we aimed to evaluate ALS cases with the ALSFRS-R fuzzy method. Although each subheading in the ALSFRS-R had the same score, the disease score was determined by the fuzzy ALSFRS-R method, based on whether a subheading had priority in management of the disease. While creating the functional rating scale ALSFRS-R approach, fuzzy ALSFRS-R score values were obtained by creating fuzzy models for each main group and integrating the fuzzy model results of each main group into a separate model. Results: In total, 50 patients with definite ALS according to the El Escorial criteria (33 men [66%] and 17 women [34%]; mean age, 58.49±10.01 years) were included in the study. When ALSFRS-R results and fuzzy ALSFRS-R results were compared, the prioritization order of 45 patients increased using the fuzzy ALSFRS-R score, while the prioritization order of five patients remained the same in both evaluations. Conclusion: The approach obtained by using fuzzy membership functions and decision rules, formed in accordance with expert opinion, was applied to the data of 50 patients from a large-scale hospital. In total, 90% of the patients had increased prioritization when using the fuzzy ALSFRS-R scoring method. Our results showed that the fuzzy approach provided more accurate information regarding a patient's condition. Copyright:
Authors: Teresa Salas Campos; Francisco Rodríguez-Santos; Jesus Esteban; Pilar Cordero Vázquez; Jesus S Mora Pardina; Alejandra Cano Carmona Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Date: 2010-10
Authors: Andrei Voustianiouk; Gregory Seidel; Janki Panchal; Mark Sivak; Adam Czaplinski; Albert Yen; Stanley H Appel; Dale J Lange Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.217