| Literature DB >> 35316580 |
Kankan Wang1, Xing Liu1,2.
Abstract
As the largest family of ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligases, cullin-RING ligases (CRLs) play crucial roles in various cellular processes, and their activities are tightly regulated by orchestrated mechanisms. Neddylation, the conjugation of a Ub-like protein NEDD8 to a target protein such as the cullin, represents a key regulatory mechanism for CRLs. Biochemical and structural studies of a few CRLs have revealed that cullin neddylation alters the CRL conformation and activates CRL-dependent protein ubiquitination. Here, using CUL2-RING ligase (CRL2) as an example, we describe our protocols for the preparation of recombinant CUL2 with or without NEDD8 conjugation, which is further used to quantitatively determine the effect of neddylation on CRL2-dependent protein ubiquitination in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: cullin-RING ligases; in vitro assay; neddylation; protein purification; ubiquitination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35316580 PMCID: PMC8969890 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc ISSN: 2691-1299
Figure 1Schematic diagram summarizing the procedures included in this article for studying the effects of neddylation on CRL‐dependent protein ubiquitination. For the preparation of recombinant CUL2•RBX1, CUL2 and RBX1 are co‐expressed in E. coli and purified through Ni2+ affinity chromatography, TEV cleavage for tag removal, StrepII‐tag affinity chromatography, and size exclusion chromatography. To examine the effect of neddylation on CRL activity, CUL2•RBX1 with or without in vitro neddylation is prepared and used for substrate ubiquitination in vitro. The ubiquitination of substrates is monitored over time by western blot (or fluorescent scan), and the ubiquitination rate is quantitatively analyzed.
Figure 2Expression and purification of CUL2•RBX1. (A) Schematic of the CUL2•RBX1 expression plasmid. (B) Representative image of the Coomassie blue–stained gel showing the CUL2 protein band before and after the TEV cleavage. (C) Chromatogram showing the elution profile of CUL2•RBX1 purified from the 1‐ml Strep‐Tactin cartridge. (D) Chromatogram showing the elution profile of CUL2•RBX1 purified from the Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column. (E) Representative image of the Coomassie blue–stained gel showing the purified CUL2•RBX1 product.
Composition of the Neddylation Reaction Mixture
| Component | Concentration |
|---|---|
| Reaction buffer (see | 1× |
| DTT (see | 2 mM |
| ATP (see | 2 mM |
| NEDD8 (R&D Systems, cat. no. UL‐812‐500) | 2 μM |
| NAE (R&D Systems, cat. no. E‐313‐025) | 0.25 μM |
| UBC12 (R&D Systems, cat. no. E2‐656‐100) | 3 μM |
| CUL2•RBX1 (see Basic Protocol | 0.2 μM |
Composition of the “Ub Mixture”
| Component | Concentration |
|---|---|
| Reaction buffer (see | 2× |
| DTT (see | 4 mM |
| ATP (see | 4 mM |
| Ub (R&D Systems, cat. no. U‐100H‐10M) | 120 μM |
| UBE1 (R&D Systems, cat. no. E‐305‐025) | 2 μM |
| CDC34 (R&D Systems, cat. no. E2‐610‐100) | 0.8 μM |
Composition of the Ubiquitination Reaction Mixture
| Volume | Component |
|---|---|
| 60 μl |
CUL2N8•RBX1 or CUL2•RBX1 or mock control (step 2) |
| 30 μl | Substrate + substrate receptor mixture (step 3) |
| 30 μl | Ub mixture (step 4) |
Final Concentrations of All Components in the Ubiquitination Reaction
| Amount | Component |
|---|---|
| 1× | Reaction buffer |
| 2 mM | DTT |
| 2 mM | ATP |
| 0.5 μM | Ub E1 |
| 0.2 μM | Ub E2 (Cdc34) |
| 30 μM | Ub |
| 0.1 μM |
CUL2N8•RBX1 (or CUL2•RBX1 or mock control) |
| 0.1 μM | VHL•EloB•EloC |
| 0.1 μM | Substrate |
Troubleshooting Guide for Basic Protocol 1
| Problem | Possible cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Poor expression in bacteria | Incorrect construct | Confirm the sequence of the construct |
| Incorrect bacterial strain used for transformation or the transformants are too old | Use the BL21 (DE3) strain to express genes driven by the T7 promoter. Use freshly transformed cells for expression. | |
| Inefficient induction | Use a new aliquot of IPTG stock solution or increase the IPTG concentration for induction | |
| Poor protein recovery | Protein precipitation | Increase the NaCl concentration in the lysis buffer (e.g., 500 mM) to help with protein solubility. Make sure β‐mercaptoethanol is freshly added to the lysis and wash buffers. Include 5‐10% glycerol in all buffers to help with protein solubility and stability. Keep the protein solution on ice or at 4°C as much as possible. |
| Insufficient binding to the Ni‐NTA beads | Check the extraction buffer. If Ni‐NTA beads from a different vendor are used, then increase the Tris·HCl concentration to 50‐100 mM and adjust the pH to 8.0. | |
| Inefficient elution | Freshly prepare the elution buffer. Make sure the imidazole concentration is correct. | |
| Inefficient TEV cleavage after the first incubation period | Low TEV activity | Repeat the TEV cleavage and incubate the protein solution at 16°C |
Troubleshooting Guide for Basic Protocol 2
| Problem | Possible cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Low neddylation or ubiquitination efficiency | Reaction components have become inactive; for example, proteins are aggregated or denatured or the ATP has broken down | Use new aliquots of protein stocks or freshly prepared ATP stock solution |
| Insufficient reaction time | Incubate for a longer time | |
| Improper reaction temperature | Perform the reactions at or above room temperature (22‐37°C) | |
| The unmodified substrates disappear much faster than the appearance of the ubiquitinated substrates | Ubiquitinated substrates located in the top portion of the SDS‐PAGE gel have been removed | Gradient SDS‐PAGE gels (e.g., 4‐20%) are recommended for sample fractionation, and the whole gel should be preserved for downstream analyses |
| Unmodified substrates are cleaved by proteases present in the reaction mixture, which is more likely to occur when substrate proteins are immunoprecipitated from human cells | Include protease inhibitor in the reaction mixture. The protease inhibitor cocktail used in the Ni‐NTA lysis buffer can also be used here, and the final concentration can be doubled. | |
| The unmodified substrates disappear over time in the mock control group | The reaction mixture is contaminated with proteases (see above) | Add protease inhibitor to the reaction mixture (see above) |
Figure 3Quantitative analysis of the effect of neddylation on CRL2‐dependent protein ubiquitination. (A) CUL2•RBX1 with or without neddylation was used for time course–dependent protein ubiquitination in vitro. Mock samples with no CUL2•RBX1 were included as the negative control. Samples were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against CUL2, the FLAG epitope (for the substrate), and VHL (the substrate receptor). (B) Relative levels of unmodified substrates versus time were plotted and fit with single exponential curves.