| Literature DB >> 35314652 |
Emily Bateman1, Sara Mansour1, Euchariachristy Okafor1, Kedzie Arrington1, Bo-Young Hong2, Jorge Cervantes1.
Abstract
Postinfectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN) is an immune-mediated acute glomerulonephritis classically seen weeks after infection with Streptococcus pyogenes, although other infectious etiologies have emerged. While it has become increasingly rare in industrialized regions, it continues to affect children in developing countries. There has been debate as to why incidence rates are declining, including the possibility of improved initial treatment of bacterial infections. The ability of antimicrobial therapy in preventing PIGN as infectious sequelae, however, has not been comprehensively assessed. As varying evidence from published studies exists, the objective of this meta-analysis is to determine if antimicrobial therapy utilized to treat an initial infection has an effect in reducing the development of PIGN in humans. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched using a comprehensive terminology strategy. From an initial search that returned 337 publications, 9 articles were included for analysis. Eight studies showed an incidence of PIGN after antimicrobial use ranging from 0.05% to 10% with a mean standardized difference (MSD) of 0.03 (0.01-0.06). Three studies showed an occurrence of PIGN without antibiotic use ranging from 1% to 13% with an MSD of 0.06 (-0.09-0.21). Our findings suggest that antimicrobial treatment for the initial infection may help diminish the development of PIGN. Although Streptococcus pyogenes infections are generally treated aggressively to prevent rheumatic fever, these findings may help further support the early treatment of bacterial infections to prevent postinfectious sequelae, especially as we consider other infectious etiologies of PIGN antimicrobial resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes; antibiotic; antimicrobial; postinfectious glomerulonephritis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35314652 PMCID: PMC8938805 DOI: 10.3390/idr14020022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Rep ISSN: 2036-7430
Figure 1Using PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis, a flowchart was created to illustrate the sources, inclusion, and exclusion of identified studies from databases and citation searching.
Included studies for this meta-analysis, with information regarding study date, patient ages considered, confirmatory testing of initial infection (if any), type of study (Cohort vs. Randomized Controlled Trial), and number of patients treated or not treated with antibiotics and those that developed PIGN.
| Study | Year | Study Location | Type of Study | Date of Study | Population Studied | Type of Sample | Prior Use of Antimicrobials | No Prior Use of Antimicrobials | Total No. of Patients | Antimicrobial Agent Utilized | Infectious Etiology Discussed | Major Findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment ( | Cases ( | No treatment ( | Cases ( | |||||||||||
| Adam et al. | 2000 | Germany | RCT | 1995–1998 | Ages 1–18 | Throat Culture | 4482 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4482 | Oral Penicillin V vs oral macrolides, cephalosporin | GAS | Efficacy of 5-day antibiotic regimen was equivalent to 10 days of penicillin V |
| Chamovitz et al. | 1954 | Wyoming, USA | RCT | 1953 | Not stated (Air Force Base) | No samples taken | 257 | 0 | 109 | 1 | 366 | Intramuscular DBED Penicillin | Exudative tonsillitis or pharyngitis | Post-streptococcal sequelae, including glomerulonephritis and rheumatic fever, occurred in control patients whereas none occurred in penicillin treated patients |
| Hovelius et al. | 1983 | Sweden | Cohort | 1976–1977 | All Ages | Throat Culture | 220 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 220 | Penicillin V (47%), Erythromycin (9%), amoxicillin or doxycycline (4%) | GAS | PSGN was diagnosed in 9 out of 220 patients, supporting the assumption that early penicillin treatment reduces incidence of PSGN |
| Schaad et al. | 2002 | Switzerland | RCT | 1996–1999 | Ages 2–12 | Throat Culture | 269 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 269 | Oral Penicillin V vs Oral Azithromycin | GAS | Clinical efficacy of 3-day azithromycin and 10-day penicillin treatments were similar, although had lower levels of bacteriologic eradication |
| Scrace & Koko et al. | 2006 | Australia | Cohort | 2005 | Ages 2–12 | No samples taken | 56 | 3 | 60 | 8 | 116 | Intramuscular Penicillin | Screening for infected scabies | Screening of children with subsequent treatment using IM penicillin may be an effective community management strategy for APSGN outbreaks |
| Stetson et al. | 1955 | Maine, USA | RCT | 1952 | Not stated (Naval Base) | No samples taken | 44 | 1 | 140 | 10 | 184 | Intramuscular Penicillin | Pharyngitis | The incidence of acute nephritis was higher among untreated patients, compared to those receiving early penicillin therapy |
| Stillerman & Bernstein | 1963 | New York, USA | RCT | 1956–1960 | Not stated (pediatric offices) | Throat Culture | 442 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 442 | Oral Phenoxymethyl Penicillin | GAS | There was a significantly higher cure rate for nontypeable Streptococcus strains when treated with larger-dose penicillin compaired to smaller-dose treatment. |
| Streeton et al. | 1995 | Austrialia | Cohort | 1995 | Ages 2–14 | No samples taken | 583 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 583 | Intramuscular Penicillin | Screening for skin infection | Epidemic of APSGN was associated with GAS skin infections. Use of penicillin may have reduced community transmission. |
| Weinstein et al. | 1968 | Massachusetts, USA | Cohort | 1948 | All Ages | Throat and Nose Cultures | 167 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 167 | Parenteral Penicillin | GAS | The treatment of scarlet fever with penicillin therapy does not prevent "late" streptococcal sequelae, including rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis. |
Derrick & Dillon excluded in MSD analysis and forest plot creation as PIGN cases occurred within 7 days of initiating antimicrobial treatment. Sholz is a repeat of Adam….
Figure 2Lists the author and study year, effect size (ES), standard error (SE), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. The forest plot reveals SMD for each study plotted against a random effects model.
Figure 3Lists the author and study year, effect size (ES), standard error (SE), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. The forest plot reveals SMD for each study plotted against a random effects model.