| Literature DB >> 25890425 |
Richard J Glassock1, Anthony Alvarado2, Jason Prosek2, Courtney Hebert2, Samir Parikh2, Anjali Satoskar2, Tibor Nadasdy2, John Forman3, Brad Rovin2, Lee A Hebert4.
Abstract
A spate of recent publications describes a newly recognized form of glomerulonephritis associated with active staphylococcal infection. The key kidney biopsy findings, glomerular immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposits dominant or codominant with IgG deposits, resemble those of IgA nephritis. Many authors describe this condition as "postinfectious" and have termed it "poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis." However, viewed through the prism of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, the prefix "post" in poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis is historically incorrect, illogical, and misleading with regard to choosing therapy. There are numerous reports describing the use of high-dose steroids to treat poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis. The decision to use steroid therapy suggests that the treating physician believed that the dominant problem was a postinfectious glomerulonephritis, not the infection itself. Unfortunately, steroid therapy in staphylococcus-related glomerulonephritis can precipitate severe staphylococcal sepsis and even death and provides no observable benefits. Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis is an authentic postinfectious glomerulonephritis; poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis is not. Making this distinction is important from the perspective of history, pathogenesis, and clinical management.Entities:
Keywords: Post-staphylococcal glomerulonephritis; kidney biopsy; latent period; medical error; nomenclature; nosology; post-infectious glomerulonephritis; renal disease; steroid treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890425 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Kidney Dis ISSN: 0272-6386 Impact factor: 8.860