| Literature DB >> 35313827 |
Zixuan Li1, Zhe Tang2, Yujie Wang1, Zijing Liu1, Guozhong Wang1, Libin Zhang1, Yongxia Wu1, Jincheng Guo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radial artery (RA) atherosclerosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients has not been systematically observed in vivo. The study aims to characterize plaque morphology and intimal hyperplasia of the RA in patients with ACS, using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Optical coherence tomography; Peripheral artery disease; Radial artery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35313827 PMCID: PMC8939080 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02561-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Representative optical coherence tomography images. A Normal RA with visible three-layer structure. B Concentric intimal hyperplasia in RA: the intima was of uniform thickness, being thinner or only as thick as than the media. C RA with eccentric intimal hyperplasia at 7 to 9 o’ clock positions. D microvessels (arrowheads). E Fibrous plaque (arrowhead) without lipid or calcium component. A signal-rich, homogeneous region is typical for fibrous tissue. F Lipid pool (dotted line) covered by thick fibrous cap. G–H Calcified plaque (asterisk). I Calcified protrusion (arrowhead). RA, radial artery
Patient CHARACTERISTICS (N = 239)
| Variable | Normal group | RIH group | RAP group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47.2 ± 9.6 | 61.1 ± 10.4a | 64.2 ± 10.0 | < 0.001 |
| Males | 88 (93.6)a,b | 46 (66.7) | 56 (73.7) | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.5 ± 3.3 | 26.3 ± 3.3 | 25.9 ± 3.3 | 0.472 |
| Current or previous smoking | 71 (45.5)a | 33 (21.2) | 52 (33.3)c | 0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 17 (18.1) | 19 (27.5) | 27 (35.5)b | 0.036 |
| Hypertension | 39 (41.5) | 40 (58.0)a | 47 (61.8)b | 0.017 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 72 (76.6) | 47 (68.1) | 61 (80.3) | 0.215 |
| Previous stroke | 1 (1.1) | 5 (7.2) | 10 (13.2)b | 0.007 |
| Previous MI | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 1 (1.3) | – |
| Peripheral vascular disease | 3 (3.2) | 2 (2.9) | 3 (3.9) | 1.000 |
| Renal insufficiency | 2 (2.1) | 2 (2.1) | 8 (10.5) | 0.051 |
| Family history of CAD | 17 (18.1) | 9 (13.0) | 8 (10.5) | 0.359 |
| Clinical presentation | ||||
| MI | 77 (81.9) | 62 (89.9) | 72 (94.7)c | 0.032 |
| Unstable angina | 17 (18.1) | 7 (10.1) | 4 (5.3) | |
| Triple vessel disease | 20 (21.3) | 17 (24.6) | 33 (43.3)b,c | 0.004 |
| Multivessel disease | 49 (52.1) | 44 (63.8) | 57 (75.0)b | 0.009 |
| Procedure characteristics | ||||
| CAG | 15 (16.0) | 6 (8.7) | 4 (5.3) | 0.064 |
| PCI | 93 (84.0) | 64 (91.3) | 57 (94.7) | |
| Medications before admission | ||||
| Antiplatelet | 1 (1.1) | 4 (5.8) | 7 (9.2)b | 0.037 |
| Statin | 4 (4.3) | 3 (4.3) | 7 (9.2) | 0.394 |
| CCB | 20 (21.3) | 13 (18.8) | 17 (22.4) | 0.901 |
| Beta blocker | 9 (9.6) | 2 (2.9) | 5 (6.6) | 0.248 |
| ACEI or ARB | 12 (12.8) | 14 (20.3) | 18 (15.8) | 0.425 |
| Biochemistry data | ||||
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 122.8 ± 34.9 | 115.4 ± 34.4 | 114.5 ± 35.1 | 0.233 |
| Serum creatinine (μmmol/L) | 77.1 ± 17.6 | 75.5 ± 14.2 | 76.9 ± 16.4 | 0.808 |
| Procedure time, min | 77.1 ± 28.6 | 80.4 ± 31.7 | 71.9 ± 32.4 | 0.285 |
| Contrast media volume, ml | 205 ± 67 | 203 ± 61 | 194 ± 76 | 0.581 |
ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, CAD coronary artery disease, CAG coronary angiogram, CCB Calcium channel blocker, LDL low-density lipoprotein, MI myocardial infarction PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, RIH radial artery intimal hyperplasia, RAP radial artery plaque, SD standard deviation
Renal insufficiency: estimated glomerular filtration < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
Values are mean ± SD, n (%), or median (25th, 75th percentiles)
p < 0.05 for anormal versus RIH; bnormal versus RAP; cRIH versus RAP
Longitudinal distribution of atherosclerotic plaque in RA
| Variables | All | Segments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Middle | Distal | |||
| Plaque present | 76 (31.8) | 47 (19.7)b | 28 (11.7) | 50 (20.9)c | 0.016 |
| Fibrous | 50 (20.9) | 28 (11.7) | 18 (7.5) | 24 (10.0) | 0.300 |
| Lipid | 39 (16.3) | 20 (8.4)b | 6 (2.5) | 21 (8.8)c | 0.008 |
| Calcified | 15 (6.3) | 5 (2.1) | 6 (2.5) | 14 (5.9)d | 0.049 |
| Total lesion length, mm | 7.1 (3.2–13.1) | 4.9 (2.5–9.5) | 5.4 (2.1–9.9) | 6.0 (3.1–13.5) | 0.394 |
| Microvessel present | 60 (25.1) | 16 (6.7) | 30 (12.6)b | 49 (20.5)c,d | < 0.001 |
| Macrophage present | 29 (12.1) | 7 (2.9) | 10 (4.2) | 19 (7.9)d | 0.033 |
| Number of Plaques | 148 | 55 (37.2) | 30 (20.3) | 63 (42.6) | |
| Plaque phenotype | |||||
| Fibrous | 72 (48.6) | 29 (40.3) | 18 (25.0) | 25 (34.7) | |
| Lipid | 50 (33.8) | 21 (42.0) | 6 (12.0) | 23 (46.0) | |
| Calcified | 26 (17.6) | 5 (19.2) | 6 (23.1) | 15 (57.7) | |
| Quantitative analysis | |||||
| Plaque (mm) | 4.9 (2.3–8.3) | 3.6 (2.1–7.8) | 5.5 (2.1–7.8) | 4.8 (3.0–8.4) | 0.389 |
| Fibrous (mm) | 3.4 (1.6–7.7) | 3.3 (1.3–8.1) | 5.0 (1.7–7.4) | 3.1 (1.6–8.7) | 0.841 |
| Calcified (mm) | 8.1 (4.6–20.8) | 10.3 (2.0–19.1) | 14.2 (4.3–29.5) | 7.8 (4.7–16.3) | 0.806 |
| Maximal depth (mm) | 0.21 (0.16–0.33) | 0.16 (0.12–0.22) | 0.17 (0.14–0.23) | 0.27 (0.18–0.56) | 0.049 |
| Maximum arc (°) | 62.8 (43.2–101.7) | 55.9 (19.3–82.3) | 70.2 (44.9–119.6) | 66.2 (43.8–101.0) | 0.470 |
| FCT (μm) | 120 (40–170) | 60 (40–170) | 90 (30–120) | 130 (40–250) | 0.389 |
| Lipid (mm) | 4.9 (3.1–6.9) | 4.9 (2.6–6.7) | 5.4 (2.5–9.0) | 4.8 (3.3–7.0) | 0.812 |
| FCT (μm) | 220 (140–330) | 180 (120–280) | 420 (210–640) | 250 (140–340) | 0.091 |
| Maximum arc (°) | 89.6 (78.3–127.3) | 87.3 (80.5–121.1) | 119.6 (102.7–127.9) | 88.4 (70.0–128.0) | 0.462 |
FCT Fibrous cap thickness
Values are n (%) or median (25th, 75th percentiles)
p < 0.05 for aproximal versus middle versus distal; bproximal versus middle; cmiddle versus distal; dproximal versus distal
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for RAP presence
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Age | < 0.001 | 1.089 | 1.058–1.120 | < 0.001 | 1.101 | 1.064–1.139 |
| Males | 0.131 | 0.606 | 0.317–1.160 | 0.484 | 0.707 | 0.267–1.870 |
| Smoker | 0.485 | 1.229 | 0.688–2.195 | 0.007 | 3.443 | 1.404–8.445 |
| Body mass index | 0.231 | 0.949 | 0.872–1.034 | 0.554 | 0.969 | 0.872–1.076 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.029 | 1.944 | 1.069–3.535 | 0.038 | 2.124 | 1.043–4.329 |
| Hypertension | 0.055 | 1.723 | 0.989–3.003 | 0.296 | 1.443 | 0.725–2.873 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.227 | 1.504 | 0.775–2.916 | 0.105 | 1.955 | 0.870–4.394 |
| Previous stroke | 0.010 | 3.965 | 1.384–11.354 | 0.234 | 2.167 | 0.607–7.733 |
| Renal insufficiency | 0.014 | 4.676 | 1.362–16.053 | 0.525 | 1.630 | 0.362–7.347 |
| Peripheral vascular disease | 0.725 | 1.299 | 0.302–5.581 | 0.574 | 0.614 | 0.112–3.359 |
Fig. 2Intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis of RA and its clinical correlation. A Scatterplots showing a significant positive correlation between the intima media ratio of non-RAP regions and age, indicated by a filled square for each patient in normal (blue), RIH (purple) or RAP (red) groups. B The Number of diseased coronary arteries is compared with RA groups. C The RA atherosclerotic lesion characters in patients with and without TVD. RA, radial artery; RAP, radial artery plaque; RIH, radial artery intimal hyperplasia; TVD, triple vessel disease
Fig. 3OCT characteristics of coronary artery culprit lesion in patients with or without RAP. Values are n (%). OCT, optical coherence tomography; RAP radial artery plaque; TCFA, thin cap fibroatheroma
Optical coherence tomography analysis of structure parameters
| Normal group | RIH group | RAP group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA, mm2 | 6.60 (4.92–8.34) | 6.58 (4.53–8.16) | 5.71 (4.63–7.46) | 0.349 |
| MD, mm | 2.87 (2.51–3.22) | 2.89 (2.40–3.21) | 2.68 (2.42–3.05) | 0.313 |
| MIT, mm | 0.08 (0.05–0.10) | 0.16 (0.13–0.19)a | 0.17 (0.12–0.20)b | < 0.001 |
| IMR | 0.50 (0.35–0.72) | 1.33 (1.11–1.90)a | 1.10 (0.81–1.83)b | < 0.001 |
| IEI | 1.81 (1.50–2.31) | 3.08 (2.75–3.51)a | 3.05 (2.75–3.78)b | < 0.001 |
| ITI | 0.41 (0.35–0.50) | 0.51 (0.44–0.62)a | 0.52 (0.42–0.67)b | < 0.001 |
| %LN | 25.94 (23.54–30.40) | 26.83 (24.52–29.75) | 29.19 (26.58–32.24)b,c | 0.002 |
| Intima area, mm2 | 0.62 (0.49–0.84) | 0.80 (0.58–0.96)a | 0.82 (0.66–1.03)a,b | < 0.001 |
| Media area, mm2 | 1.58 (1.35–1.93) | 1.58 (1.16–2.03) | 1.54 (1.31–1.81) | 0.922 |
LA lumen area, MD mean diameter, MIT maximal intimal thickness, IMR intima/media thickness ratio, IEI Intimal eccentricity index, ITI intimal area/medial area, %LN luminal narrowing index, others as in Table 1
Values are n (%), or median (25th, 75th percentiles)
p < 0.05 for anormal versus RIH; bnormal versus RAP; cRIH versus RAP