| Literature DB >> 35313772 |
Zhenxing Sun1, Dan Yuan2, Yaxing Sun3, Yi Guo1, Guoqin Wang1, Peihai Zhang1, James Wang1, Wei Shi1, Guihuai Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal ependymoma is the most common intramedullary tumor in adults. This study was performed to evaluate whether intraoperative yellow fluorescence use enhances our ability to identify the tumor margin and residual tumor tissue in intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma resection. We also evaluated patients' clinical conditions at a 3-month follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Spinal cord tumor; ependymoma; functional outcome; neurosurgery; residual tumor; yellow fluorescence
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35313772 PMCID: PMC8943562 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221082889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Accumulated improvements in patients with spinal cord ependymoma exhibiting preoperative dysfunction.
| Preoperative dysfunction | Patients, n | Postoperative improvement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1 month | 3 months | ||||
| Sensory | 53 | 12 (22.6) | 27 (50.9)① | 44 (83.0)①,② | 38.767 | <0.001 |
| Motor | 51a | 23 (45.1)b | 28 (54.9)c | 42 (82.4)d,①,② | 15.958 | <0.001 |
| Respiratory | 4 | 4 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | / | / |
| Urinary and defecation | 12 | 5 (41.7) | 5 (41.7) | 8 (66.7) | 2.000 | 0.368 |
Data are presented as n (%).
aIncluding five patients with paralysis; bIncluding three patients with paralysis, with Grade I or II muscle strength; cIncluding four patients with paralysis, with Grade I or II muscle strength; dIncluding three patients with paralysis, with Grade I or II muscle strength. ①Significantly different compared with 7 days postoperatively (P < 0.05); ②Significantly different compared with 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05).
Postoperative improvement of patients with aggravated or newly developed dysfunction.
| Aggravated or newly developed dysfunction | Patients, n | Postoperative improvement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1 month | 3 months | ||||
| Sensory | 44 | 16 (36.4) | 28 (63.6)① | 35 (79.5)① | 17.465 | <0.001 |
| Motor | 23 | 11 (47.8) | 17 (73.9)① | 20 (87.0)① | 7.375 | 0.025 |
| Urinary and defecation | 7 | 1 (14.3) | 4 (57.1) | 5 (71.4) | 4.964 | 0.084 |
Data are presented as n (%).
①Significantly different compared with 7 days postoperatively (P < 0.05).
McCormick spinal cord function grades of 56 patients with spinal cord ependymoma before and 3 months after surgery.
| McCormick grade | Preoperatively | 3 months postoperatively | U value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I | 2 (3.6) | 32 (57.2) | 768.000 | <0.001 |
| Grade II | 31 (55.4) | 12 (21.4) | ||
| Grade III | 14 (25.0) | 8 (14.3) | ||
| Grade IV | 9 (16.1) | 4 (7.1) |
Data are presented as n (%).
Figure 1.Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations and intraoperative microscopic findings of patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma at the T3–7 thoracic vertebrae. (a) Preoperative MRI in which a sagittal T2 image shows an intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma exhibiting a relatively regular contour signal at the T3–7 thoracic vertebrae, with a rather clear boundary. (b) Preoperative MRI in which a sagittal enhanced scan shows no contrast enhancement of the tumor. (c) Intraoperative microscopy indicates that the tumor is located at the dorsal region of the spinal cord (shown by gray color) with a clear boundary. (d) Under yellow fluorescence, the tumor does not show enhanced contrast. (e) T2 sagittal MRI 3 months postoperatively showing no residual tumor, but a visible tumor cavity in the surgical region. (f) Sagittal enhanced MRI 3 months postoperatively indicating no residual tumor or recurrence.
Figure 2.Intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma at the C1–T1 segment. (a)–(c) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in which a T1 image shows a thickened spinal cord; a T2 image shows the intramedullary contour signal of masses in the C1–T1 segment, with visible syringes at both ends; and an enhanced scan shows significant contrast enhancement of the tumor. (d) and (e) Intraoperative microscopy shows the intactness and clear boundary of the tumor; under the fluorescence mode, enhanced contrast of the tumor was achieved, especially at the base of the tumor. (f) and (g) MRI 3 months postoperatively in which the T1 and T2 images indicate no residual tumor or recurrence.
Figure 3.Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations and intraoperative findings of patients with ependymoma. (a) Preoperative MRI in which a sagittal T2 image shows intramedullary masses with an irregular contour signal in the C2–T2 segment, with syringes visible at both ends. (b) Preoperative MRI in which a sagittal enhanced scan shows significant contrast enhancement of the tumor mass and enhanced syrinx walls at both ends. (c) The syrinx of a tumor at the head end is shown under white light; it is difficult to determine the presence of the tumor. (d) The contrast of the syrinx wall is clear under the fluorescence mode, and the mass was removed as a suspected tumor. (e) MRI examination 3 months postoperatively; a sagittal T2 image shows the tumor cavity after tumor resection. (f) MRI examination 3 months postoperatively; a sagittal enhanced MRI scan indicates no residual tumor or recurrence.