| Literature DB >> 35313445 |
Sayed Sartaj Sohrab1,2, Sherif Aly El-Kafrawy1,2, Esam Ibraheem Azhar1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: The COVID-19 was identified for the first time from the sea food market, Wuhan city, China in 2019 and the pathogenic organism was identified as SARS-CoV-2. Currently, this virus has spread to 223 countries and territories and known as a serious issue for the global human community. Many vaccines have been developed and used for immunization.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19, The new Coronavirus Disease 2019; Designing; HEK-293 cells; In silico prediction; MFE, Minimum free energy; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNAi, RNA interference; SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coranavirus-2; WHO, World Health Organization; siRNA, short interfering RNA; siRNAs
Year: 2022 PMID: 35313445 PMCID: PMC8925144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101965
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J King Saud Univ Sci ISSN: 1018-3647
List of predicted siRNAs from leader protein gene sequences of SARS-CoV-2- (MT630432-SAU).
| S.No | Location of siRNAs in the viral genome (Start-End) | Target sequence | Predicted RNA oligo sequences (5′→3′) Guide/Passenger strand | Seed-duplex stability (Tm/°C) Guide/Passenger strand | Minimum Free Energy (MFE) in Centroid Secondary Structure (kcal/mol) | Docking score/Ligand RMSD (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18–40 | TGGTTTCAACGAGAAAACACACG | UGUGUUUUCUCGUUGAAACCA | 13.3/14.9 | −25.05 | −285.03/153.01 |
| 2 | 154–176 | GGCTTAGTAGAAGTTGAAAAAGG | UUUUUCAACUUCUACUAAGCC | 7.7/11.3 | –22.11 | −261.10/350.30 |
| 3 | 468–483 | ATGAAGATTTTCAAGAAAACTGG | AGUUUUCUUGAAAAUCUUCAU | 13.3/5.3 | −21.17 | −328.83/360.59 |
Fig. 1AThe possible folding and secondary structure prediction of in silico predicted siRNAs molecules computed using the online web server (siRNAs1-3).
Fig. 1BSecondary structure prediction of leader protein gene computed by using the online web server.
Fig. 2Molecular docking of predicted siRNAs (1–3) with SARS-CoV-2-leader protein gene and 3D interaction diagram of different docked complex with the target.
Cytotoxicity of different siRNAs-1–4 at various concentrations (0.1–50 nM) in HEK-293 cells.
| 50 | 1.51 | 1.50 | 1.58 |
| 25 | 1.40 | 1.43 | 1.41 |
| 10 | 1.21 | 1.27 | 1.25 |
| 5.0 | 1.22 | 1.24 | 1.21 |
| 1.0 | 1.33 | 1.31 | 1.36 |
| 0.5 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.25 |
| 0.25 | 1.31 | 1.30 | 1.35 |
| 0.1 | 1.27 | 1.25 | 1.24 |
| CC 50 | 114.1 | 105.2 | 120.0 |
| Lipofectamine 2000 in HEK-293 Cells | 1.487 | ||
| Lipofectamine + Opti-MEM in HEK-293 Cells | 1.151 | ||
| Only Opti-MEM in HEK-293 Cells | 1.168 | ||
| Only HEK-293 Cells (Negative control) | 1.117 | ||
Fig. 3Cytotoxicity of different siRNAs-1–3 at various concentrations (0.1–50 nM) in HEK-293 cells. We used Lipofectamine alone, Lipofectamine and Opti-MEM, only Opti-MEM, and only cells as negative control in this study to evaluate their effect on grown cells.
Ct value of quantitative real-time PCR results of siRNAs-1–3 at different concentrations in HEK-293 cells.
| 50 | 11.42 | 12.56 | 11.99 |
| 25 | 14.81 | 14.85 | 15.11 |
| 10 | 19.87 | 19.79 | 19.54 |
| 5.0 | 18.99 | 19.90 | 19.87 |
| 1.0 | 15.21 | 14.87 | 15.19 |
| 0.50 | 14.81 | 13.91 | 13.58 |
| 0.25 | 14.88 | 14.59 | 14.98 |
| 0.10 | 15.81 | 15.78 | 15.21 |
| Negative control | 44.20 | 45.69 | 48.36 |
| Positive control | 17.20 | 15.40 | 16.22 |
Fig. 4Graphical representation of Ct value of quantitative real-time PCR result of SARS-CoV-2 in HEK-293 cells. The siRNAs were delivered to the cells at various concentration such as 010, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 25 and 50 nM.