| Literature DB >> 33519276 |
Sayed Sartaj Sohrab1,2, Sherif Aly El-Kafrawy1,2, Zeenat Mirza2,3, Ahmed M Hassan1, Fatima Alsaqaf1, Esam Ibraheem Azhar1,2.
Abstract
The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus is well known to cause respiratory syndrome and this virus was identified and isolated for the first time from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2012 from infected patient. In this report, we have conducted the in-silico prediction, designing and evaluation of siRNAs targeting Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus orf1ab gene to inhibit the virus replication. By using bioinformatics software, total twenty-one functional, off-target reduced siRNA were selected from four hundred and sixty-two siRNAs based on their greater potency and specificity. We have evaluated only seven siRNAs to analyze their performance and efficacy as antivirals by reverse transfection approach in Vero cells. There was no cytotoxicity of siRNAs at various concentrations was observed in Vero cells. Based on the real-time PCR results, better inhibition of viral replication was observed in the siRNA-1 and 4 as compared to other siRNAs. The results generated from this work provided suitable information about the efficacy of siRNAs which encouraged us to further evaluate the remaining siRNAs to determine their inhibitory effect on the virus replication. We concluded that the insilico prediction and designing resulted in the screening of potential siRNAs with better efficiency, and strength. This can be used to develop oligonucleotide-based antiviral therapeutics against MERS-CoV in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: In silico prediction; MERS-CoV; Saudi Arabia; Vero cells; siRNAs
Year: 2020 PMID: 33519276 PMCID: PMC7833792 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Multiple sequence alignment of ORF1ab gene with selected MERS-CoV genome.
Sequence identity matrix of selected MERS-CoV based on full-genome.
| KF958702 | Jeddah | Human | 2014 | 99.0 |
| KU851859 | Jeddah | Human | 2015 | 99.6 |
| KF192507 | UAE | Human | 2013 | 99.8 |
| KT156561 | Oman | Human | 2013 | 99.7 |
| KT861628 | Jordan | Human | 2014 | 99.7 |
| KX034100 | Korea | Human | 2015 | 99.7 |
| KT036372 | China | Human | 2015 | 99.6 |
| KP223131 | Florida | Human | 2014 | 99.8 |
| NC019843 | Netherland | Human | 2012 | 99.6 |
| KF745068 | France | Human | 2013 | 99.7 |
| KT225476 | Thailand | Human | 2015 | 99.7 |
| KJ556336 | Jeddah | Human | 2013 | 92.3 |
| KF917527 | Jeddah | Camel | 2013 | 99.9 |
| KX108946 | UAE | Camel | 2015 | 99.6 |
| KJ650098 | Qatar | Camel | 2014 | 99.8 |
| KT368879 | Riyadh | Camel | 2015 | 99.7 |
| KJ477102 | Egypt | Camel | 2013 | 99.4 |
Fig. 2Flow diagram of in silico prediction and design of siRNAs against MERS-CoV orf1ab gene.
List of predicted siRNAs from MERS-CoV orf1ab gene (Accession NumberKF958702).
| 1 | 791–813 | AGCAATCTATTTTTACTATTAAT | UAAUAGUAAAAAUAGAUUGCU | 0.84 | 6.3/6.6 | 110 |
| 2 | 1615–1637 | ATGGATAATGCTATTAATGTTGG | AACAUUAAUAGCAUUAUCCAU | 0.75 | 6.9/8.7 | 32 |
| 3 | 1910–1932 | GCGACTTTATGTCTACAATTATT | UAAUUGUAGACAUAAAGUCGC | 0.81 | 6.9/4.6 | 1184 |
| 4 | 4018–4040 | GACACTTTAGATGATATCTTACA | UAAGAUAUCAUCUAAAGUGUC | 0.70 | 6.6/9.8 | 180 |
| 5 | 5597–5619 | ATGCTATTAGTTTGAGTTTTAAT | UAAAACUCAAACUAAUAGCAU | 0.78 | 13.3/2.8 | 1230 |
| 6 | 5598–5620 | TGCTATTAGTTTGAGTTTTAATA | UUAAAACUCAAACUAAUAGCA | 0.81 | 4.9/6.3 | 291 |
| 7 | 5819–5841 | GAGCTAGTTTGCGTCAAATTTTT | AAAUUUGACGCAAACUAGCUC | 0.70 | 7.4/9.8 | 5167 |
Fig. 3Secondary structure generated by RNAfold in forna format and binding position of potential siRNAs. To their specific targets in the orf1ab gene, bases highlighted in green indicate stem, bases highlighted in red indicate Multiloops (junctions) while bases highlighted in blue indicate Hairpin loops, Yellow color indicates Interior Loops and orange color indicates 5′ and 3′ unpaired region.
CT value of qRT- PCR results of siRNAs at various concentrations.
| 50 nM | 12.83/14.48 | 11.56/12.95 | 12.99/13.84 | 13.75/14.41 | 13.52/14.75 | 13.13/14.21 | 12.78/14.67 |
| 25 nM | 15.21/15.98 | 14.65/16.47 | 15.41/16.12 | 15.82/16.12 | 14.43/16.34 | 14.65/15.75 | 15.56/16.55 |
| 10 nM | 18.99/18.85 | 16.57/17.75 | 14.54/15.95 | 18.61/19.46 | 15.99/17.89 | 15.21/17.51 | 15.97/17.67 |
| 5 nM | 17.95/17.89 | 15.95/17.87 | 14.81/16.83 | 17.84/17.95 | 16.75/17.91 | 14.12/17.96 | 16.78/16.98 |
| 1 nM | 13.11/14.11 | 13.21/15.61 | 13.19/14.54 | 13.65/14.61 | 13.15/14.31 | 13.78/16.78 | 13.34/15.84 |
| 0.5 nM | 12.91/13.42 | 12.36/13.54 | 13.85/14.96 | 13.21/14.32 | 13.45/14.64 | 13.72/14.91 | 13.8/14.69 |
| 0.25 M | 12.78/13.56 | 12.01/13.65 | 12.78/13.97 | 13.91/14.87 | 13.25/14.83 | 13.09/14.68 | 12.56/14.53 |
| 0.1 nM | 18.91/17.81 | 12.01/14.95 | 12.21/15.89 | 18.49/17.94 | 16.11/16.23 | 16.64/16.95 | 13.35/15.87 |
| Positive control | 11.23/11.28 | ||||||
| Negative positive control | 2.08/2.04 |
Fig. 4Graphical representation of Ct value of RT-PCR result (A: Supernatant; B: Lysate).