Literature DB >> 35312788

Integrating a physical activity coaching intervention into diabetes care: a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot pragmatic trial.

Amy G Huebschmann1,2,3, Russell E Glasgow3,4, Ian M Leavitt5, Kristi Chapman1, John D Rice6, Steven Lockhart3, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley7,8, Jane E B Reusch2,9,10, Andrea L Dunn11, Judith G Regensteiner1,2.   

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) counseling is under-utilized in primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), despite improving important health outcomes, including physical function. We adapted evidence-based PA counseling programs to primary care patients, staff, and leader's needs, resulting in "Be ACTIVE" comprised of shared PA tracker data (FitBit©), six theory-informed PA coaching calls, and three in-person clinician visits. In a pilot randomized pragmatic trial, we evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Be ACTIVE. Sedentary patients with T2D were randomized to Be ACTIVE versus an enhanced control condition. Mixed methods assessments of feasibility and acceptability included costs. Objective pilot effectiveness outcomes included PA (primary outcome, accelerometer steps/week), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) physical function measure, and behavioral PA predictors. Fifty patients were randomized to Be ACTIVE or control condition. Acceptability was >90% for patients and clinic staff. Coaching and PA tracking costs of ~$90/patient met Medicare reimbursement criteria. Pre-post PA increased by ~11% (Be ACTIVE) and ~6% in controls (group difference: 1574 ± 4391 steps/week, p = .72). As compared to controls, Be ACTIVE participants significantly improved SPPB (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. -0.1 ± 0.3, p = .01, changes >0.5 points prevent falls clinically), and PA predictors of self-efficacy (p = .02) and social-environmental support (p < .01). In this pilot trial, Be ACTIVE was feasible and highly acceptable to stakeholders and yielded significant improvements in objective physical function consistent with lower fall risk, whereas PA changes were less than anticipated. Be ACTIVE may need additional adaptation or a longer duration to improve PA outcomes. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Physical activity; Physical function; Primary care; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; acceptability

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35312788      PMCID: PMC9150080          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.626


  37 in total

1.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  The impact of out-of-pocket payments on prevention and health-related lifestyle: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Reza Rezayatmand; Milena Pavlova; Wim Groot
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 3.  Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  George Keel; Carl Savage; Muhammad Rafiq; Pamela Mazzocato
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Daily Step Counts for Measuring Physical Activity Exposure and Its Relation to Health.

Authors:  William E Kraus; Kathleen F Janz; Kenneth E Powell; Wayne W Campbell; John M Jakicic; Richard P Troiano; Kyle Sprow; Andrea Torres; Katrina L Piercy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Effects of a 12-month physical activity counselling intervention on glycaemic control and on the status of cardiovascular risk factors in people with Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A Kirk; N Mutrie; P MacIntyre; M Fisher
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Activity Counseling Trial (ACT): rationale, design, and methods. Activity Counseling Trial Research Group.

Authors:  S N Blair; W B Applegate; A L Dunn; W H Ettinger; W L Haskell; A C King; T M Morgan; J A Shih; D G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.

Authors:  Per Nilsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields-a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Elin Roberts; Andy Healey; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Digital Health and the State of Interoperable Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Jessica Germaine Shull
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  Bidirectional 10-year associations of accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior and activity categories with weight among middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Bethany Barone Gibbs; David Aaby; Juned Siddique; Jared P Reis; Barbara Sternfeld; Kara Whitaker; Kelley Pettee Gabriel
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pragmatic considerations and approaches for measuring staff time as an implementation cost in health systems and clinics: key issues and applied examples.

Authors:  Amy G Huebschmann; Katy E Trinkley; Mark Gritz; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-04-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.