Literature DB >> 35312750

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Serial Analysis of Clinical Cancer Genomics Data Identifies Changing Treatment Recommendations and Therapeutic Targets.

Catherine G Fischer1, Aparna Pallavajjala2, LiQun Jiang2, Valsamo Anagnostou3, Jessica Tao3, Emily Adams2, James R Eshleman2,3, Christopher D Gocke2,3, Ming-Tseh Lin2, Elizabeth A Platz3,4, Rena R Xian2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the pace of predictive biomarker and targeted therapy development, it is unknown whether repeat annotation of the same next-generation sequencing data can identify additional clinically actionable targets that could be therapeutically leveraged. In this study, we sought to determine the predictive yield of serial reanalysis of clinical tumor sequencing data. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Using artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted variant annotation, we retrospectively reanalyzed sequencing data from 2,219 patients with cancer from a single academic medical center at 3-month intervals totaling 9 months in 2020. The yield of serial reanalysis was assessed by the proportion of patients with improved strength of therapeutic recommendations.
RESULTS: A total of 1,775 patients (80%) had ≥1 potentially clinically actionable mutation at baseline, including 243 (11%) patients who had an alteration targeted by an FDA-approved drug for their cancer type. By month 9, the latter increased to 458 (21%) patients mainly due to a single pan-cancer agent directed against tumors with high tumor mutation burden. Within this timeframe, 67 new therapies became available and 45 were no longer available. Variant pathogenicity classifications also changed leading to changes in treatment recommendations for 124 patients (6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Serial reannotation of tumor sequencing data improved the strength of treatment recommendations (based on level of evidence) in a mixed cancer cohort and showed substantial changes in available therapies and variant classifications. These results suggest a role for repeat analysis of tumor sequencing data in clinical practice, which can be streamlined with AI support. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35312750      PMCID: PMC9167716          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  41 in total

1.  Clonal MET Amplification as a Determinant of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Gillianne G Y Lai; Tse Hui Lim; John Lim; Perry J R Liew; Xue Lin Kwang; Rahul Nahar; Zaw Win Aung; Angela Takano; Yin Yeng Lee; Dawn P X Lau; Gek San Tan; Sze Huey Tan; Wan Ling Tan; Mei-Kim Ang; Chee Keong Toh; Bien Soo Tan; Anantham Devanand; Chow Wei Too; Apoorva Gogna; Boon Hean Ong; Tina P T Koh; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Quan Sing Ng; Amit Jain; Tanujaa Rajasekaran; Ju Yuan; Tony Kiat Hon Lim; Alvin S T Lim; Axel M Hillmer; Wan Teck Lim; N Gopalakrishna Iyer; Wai Leong Tam; Weiwei Zhai; Eng-Huat Tan; Daniel S W Tan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Pan-Cancer Analysis of CDK12 Loss-of-Function Alterations and Their Association with the Focal Tandem-Duplicator Phenotype.

Authors:  Ethan S Sokol; Dean Pavlick; Garrett M Frampton; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Siraj M Ali; Tamara L Lotan; Drew M Pardoll; Jon H Chung; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-10

3.  Patient-Paired Sample Congruence Between 2 Commercial Liquid Biopsy Tests.

Authors:  Gonzalo Torga; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Functional analysis of human MLH1 and MSH2 missense variants and hybrid human-yeast MLH1 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A R Ellison; J Lofing; G A Bitter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Functional analysis of human MLH1 variants using yeast and in vitro mismatch repair assays.

Authors:  Masanobu Takahashi; Hideki Shimodaira; Corinne Andreutti-Zaugg; Richard Iggo; Richard D Kolodner; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine through an International Consortium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Benefit From Genome-Driven Oncology.

Authors:  John Marquart; Emerson Y Chen; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden.

Authors:  Zachary R Chalmers; Caitlin F Connelly; David Fabrizio; Laurie Gay; Siraj M Ali; Riley Ennis; Alexa Schrock; Brittany Campbell; Adam Shlien; Juliann Chmielecki; Franklin Huang; Yuting He; James Sun; Uri Tabori; Mark Kennedy; Daniel S Lieber; Steven Roels; Jared White; Geoffrey A Otto; Jeffrey S Ross; Levi Garraway; Vincent A Miller; Phillip J Stephens; Garrett M Frampton
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Assessment of Clinical Benefit of Integrative Genomic Profiling in Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Erin F Cobain; Yi-Mi Wu; Pankaj Vats; Rashmi Chugh; Francis Worden; David C Smith; Scott M Schuetze; Mark M Zalupski; Vaibhav Sahai; Ajjai Alva; Anne F Schott; Megan E V Caram; Daniel F Hayes; Elena M Stoffel; Michelle F Jacobs; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Xuhong Cao; Rui Wang; David Lucas; Yu Ning; Erica Rabban; Janice Bell; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Aaron M Udager; Marcin Cieslik; Robert J Lonigro; Lakshmi P Kunju; Dan R Robinson; Moshe Talpaz; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.