Literature DB >> 30676858

Clonal MET Amplification as a Determinant of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Gillianne G Y Lai1, Tse Hui Lim2, John Lim1, Perry J R Liew2, Xue Lin Kwang1, Rahul Nahar3, Zaw Win Aung1, Angela Takano2, Yin Yeng Lee3, Dawn P X Lau1, Gek San Tan2, Sze Huey Tan1, Wan Ling Tan1, Mei-Kim Ang1, Chee Keong Toh1, Bien Soo Tan2, Anantham Devanand2, Chow Wei Too2, Apoorva Gogna2, Boon Hean Ong4, Tina P T Koh1, Ravindran Kanesvaran1, Quan Sing Ng1, Amit Jain1, Tanujaa Rajasekaran1, Ju Yuan3, Tony Kiat Hon Lim2, Alvin S T Lim2, Axel M Hillmer3, Wan Teck Lim1, N Gopalakrishna Iyer1, Wai Leong Tam3, Weiwei Zhai3, Eng-Huat Tan1, Daniel S W Tan1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor ( MET) activation has been implicated as an oncogenic driver in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can mediate primary and secondary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). High copy number thresholds have been suggested to enrich for response to MET inhibitors. We examined the clinical relevance of MET copy number gain (CNG) in the setting of treatment-naive metastatic EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MET fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in 200 consecutive patients identified as metastatic treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant-positive. We defined MET-high as CNG greater than or equal to 5, with an additional criterion of MET/centromeric portion of chromosome 7 ratiο greater than or equal to 2 for amplification. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) to EGFR TKI in patients identified as MET-high and -low was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Multiregion single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis was performed on 13 early-stage resected EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC across 59 sectors to investigate intratumoral heterogeneity of MET CNG.
RESULTS: Fifty-two (26%) of 200 patients in the metastatic cohort were MET-high at diagnosis; 46 (23%) had polysomy and six (3%) had amplification. Median TTF was 12.2 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 22.6 months) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 15.0 months) for MET-high and -low, respectively ( P = .566), with no significant difference in response rate regardless of copy number thresholds. Loss of MET was observed in three of six patients identified as MET-high who underwent postprogression biopsies, which is consistent with marked intratumoral heterogeneity in MET CNG observed in early-stage tumors. Suboptimal response (TTF, 1.0 to 6.4 months) to EGFR TKI was observed in patients with coexisting MET amplification (five [3.2%] of 154).
CONCLUSION: Although up to 26% of TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC harbor high MET CNG by fluorescence in situ hybridization, this did not significantly affect response to TKI, except in patients identified as MET-amplified. Our data underscore the limitations of adopting arbitrary copy number thresholds and the need for cross-assay validation to define therapeutically tractable MET pathway dysregulation in EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30676858     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.00177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

1.  MET IHC Is a Poor Screen for MET Amplification or MET Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Data from a Tri-Institutional Cohort of the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium.

Authors:  Robin Guo; Lynne D Berry; Dara L Aisner; Jamie Sheren; Theresa Boyle; Paul A Bunn; Bruce E Johnson; David J Kwiatkowski; Alexander Drilon; Lynette M Sholl; Mark G Kris
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  MET Copy Number as a Secondary Driver of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Kurtis D Davies
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The Pros and Cons of Incorporating Transcriptomics in the Age of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Victor T G Lin; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Detection of MET amplification by droplet digital PCR in peripheral blood samples of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Rui Sun; Zhizhong Wang; Yuying Zhang; Xiao Xiao; Yizhe Liu; Beibei Xin; Hui Xiong; Daru Lu; Jie Ma
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer.

Authors:  Pasi A Jänne; Tony Mok; Solange Peters; Antonio Passaro
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  MET Expression Level in Lung Adenocarcinoma Loosely Correlates with MET Copy Number Gain/Amplification and Is a Poor Predictor of Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Wei Yin; Ming Guo; Zhenya Tang; Gokce A Toruner; Joanne Cheng; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Guilin Tang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  Ferdinandos Skoulidis; John V Heymach
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  When the MET receptor kicks in to resist targeted therapies.

Authors:  Marie Fernandes; Philippe Jamme; Alexis B Cortot; Zoulika Kherrouche; David Tulasne
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Inferior outcome of bone metastasis in non-small-cell-lung-cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Authors:  Yue-Yun Chen; Pei-Pei Wang; Yang- Fu; Qing- Li; Jiang-Fang Tian; Ting- Liu; Zhen Lin; Zhen-Yu Ding
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.072

10.  Co-Occurring Potentially Actionable Oncogenic Drivers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yiming Zhao; Shuyuan Wang; Zhengyu Yang; Yu Dong; Yanan Wang; Lele Zhang; Hai Hu; Baohui Han
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.