| Literature DB >> 35309043 |
Muhammad Shafay1, Raja Wasim Ahmad1,2, Khaled Salah1, Ibrar Yaqoob1, Raja Jayaraman3, Mohammed Omar3.
Abstract
Deep learning has gained huge traction in recent years because of its potential to make informed decisions. A large portion of today's deep learning systems are based on centralized servers and fall short in providing operational transparency, traceability, reliability, security, and trusted data provenance features. Also, training deep learning models by utilizing centralized data is vulnerable to the single point of failure problem. In this paper, we explore the importance of integrating blockchain technology with deep learning. We review the existing literature focused on the integration of blockchain with deep learning. We classify and categorize the literature by devising a thematic taxonomy based on seven parameters; namely, blockchain type, deep learning models, deep learning specific consensus protocols, application area, services, data types, and deployment goals. We provide insightful discussions on the state-of-the-art blockchain-based deep learning frameworks by highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, we compare the existing blockchain-based deep learning frameworks based on four parameters such as blockchain type, consensus protocol, deep learning method, and dataset. Finally, we present important research challenges which need to be addressed to develop highly trustworthy deep learning frameworks.Entities:
Keywords: AI; Blockchain; Deep learning; Ethereum; Federated learning; Machine learning; Security; Smart contracts; Transparency
Year: 2022 PMID: 35309043 PMCID: PMC8919362 DOI: 10.1007/s10586-022-03582-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cluster Comput ISSN: 1386-7857 Impact factor: 1.809
Fig. 1Key benefits of deep learning techniques in various fields
Fig. 2Organogram of the paper
Fig. 3Advantages of Blockchain technology
Fig. 4Relationships between AI, machine learning, and deep learning [42]
A summary of the deep learning and blockchain features that assists in improving deep learning-based applications [26]
| Blockchain | Deep learning | Potential outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Immutable | Scalable | Flexibility in learning strategies |
| Transparent | Layered | Collaborative model udate |
| Integrity | Resource intensive | Enhanced scalability |
| Cybersecurity | Data intensive | Upgraded data security |
Fig. 5Benefits resulted from the integration of deep learning and blockchain technology
Fig. 6A taxonomy of blockchain for deep learning frameworks
Fig. 7Blockchain-based system for Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication
Fig. 8Blockchain-based federated learning
Fig. 9Highlighting the system components and participants and describing the outcomes resulting from the integration of deep learning with blockchain technology in various fields
A comparison and analysis of state-of-the-art blockchain-based deep learning frameworks
| Category | Blockchain type | Consensus protocol | Deep learning method | Dataset used | Study strengths | Study limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ovarian cancer prediction [ | N/A | N/A | One-shot Learning | Human Protein Atlas | Requires less training time as only one example per class is required | Performance is not as good as DNN |
| Data exchange [ | Private | Proof-of-Information | Incremental Learning | N/A | The considered model can learn new classes on a pre-trained network | Possibility of happening of catastrophic forgetting |
| EHR prediction [ | N/A | N/A | LSTM | EHR-based dataset | Superior performance on sequential data | Longer training time and excessive memory requirement |
| Arrhythmia classification [ | N/A | N/A | SDA+ Sigmoid | MIT-BIH Dataset | Deals well with noise and random variations in the data | Requires large amount of data for better results |
| Miner Node Selection [ | N/A | Zero-Knowledge Proof | Deep Boltzmann Machine | N/A | Data labelling is not required | Expensive in terms of memory and CPU cycles |
| Communication security [ | Private | N/A | DNN+ Reinforcement Learning | N/A | Implemented method can solve complex problems that conventional methods cannot | Not suitable for simple problems |
| Securing blockchain [ | N/A | Proof-of-Work | N/A | Game Theory-based Utility Function | Data is fully secured | This approach is not practical |
| Traffic jam prediction [ | Public | Proof-of-Authority | ANN+LSTM | Historic Traffic Data + Custom Dataset | ANN are fault tolerant as information is distributed over all the nodes | Black box behavior makes it impossible to develop a relation between dependent and indepen- dent variables |
| Traffic flow prediction [ | Consortium | Delegated PBFT | GRU | N/A | Lesser expensive in terms of memory requirement as compared to LSTM | Lesser learning ability compared to LSTM |
| Incident prediction [ | N/A | N/A | CNN | Custom Dataset | Excellent feature extraction cap- ability and computationally efficient solution | Large dataset is required for training and noise in data can cause misclassification |
| GPS correction [ | Public | Delegated PoS | DNN | Custom Dataset | Reduced need of feature engineering | Not prone to data redundancy and inconsistency |