Literature DB >> 35304698

Searching beyond the looking glass with sandwich priming.

Brice Brossette1, Stéphanie Massol2, Bernard Lété2.   

Abstract

Duñabeitia et al. (NeuroImage 54(4), 3004-3009, 2011) demonstrated that mirror letters induce the same electrophysiological response as canonical letters during the orthographic stage of visual word recognition. However, behavioral evidence in support of such an effect has remained scarce. We hypothesize that the poor reliability of the behavioral data could be due to the lack of sensitivity of the paradigms used in the literature. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we compared conventional and sandwich-masked priming paradigms. Results showed that mirror primes (mirror) produced a significant priming effect on high-frequency words in the case of sandwich priming only. In Experiment 3, we used sandwich priming with a new material set to address a number of concerns regarding prime-target visual overlap. We obtained a graded facilitatory mirror-letter priming effect that acted additively with lexical frequency, thus supporting the idea that it originates in the fast automatic orthographic stage. Given that the graded priming effect provides little support for the idea of the complete preservation of mirror invariance for non-reversal letters, complementary explanations are explored.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthography; Priming; Word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35304698     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02405-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  43 in total

1.  Inhibition of the mirror generalization process in reading in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ahr; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-01-27

2.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Cultural recycling of cortical maps.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming.

Authors:  J S Bowers; G Vigliocco; R Haan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation.

Authors:  Krysta Chauncey; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008

6.  Braille readers break mirror invariance for both visual Braille and Latin letters.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-27

7.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Chris I Baker; Jia Liu; Lawrence L Wald; Kenneth K Kwong; Thomas Benner; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Blind readers break mirror invariance as sighted do.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Olivier Collignon; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Michaël Stevens
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2018-01-12

10.  A backwards glance at words: Using reversed-interior masked primes to test models of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.