| Literature DB >> 35304646 |
Loes A van Gemert1, Bastiaan E de Galan2,3,4, Ron A Wevers5, Rob Ter Heine6, Michèl A Willemsen7,8.
Abstract
Traditionally, clinicians consider lactate as a waste product of anaerobic glycolysis. Interestingly, research has shown that lactate may serve as an alternative fuel for the brain to protect it against harm. The increasing scientific awareness of the potential beneficial side of lactate, however, is entering the clinic rather slowly. Following this, and realizing that the application of potential novel therapeutic strategies in pediatric populations often lags behind the development in adults, this review summarizes the key data on therapeutic use of intravenous infusion of sodium lactate in humans. PubMed and clinicaltrial.gov were searched up until November 2021 focusing on interventional studies in humans. Thirty-four articles were included in this review, with protocols of lactate infusion in adults with diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiac disease. One study on lactate infusion in children was also included. Results of our literature search show that sodium lactate can be safely administrated, without major side effects. Additionally, the present literature clearly shows the potential benefits of therapeutic lactate infusion under certain pathological circumstances, including rather common clinical conditions like traumatic brain injury.Entities:
Keywords: Brain energy metabolism; Review; Sodium lactate; Therapeutic lactate infusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35304646 PMCID: PMC9110504 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04446-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.860
Study designs and observed biochemical side effects of sodium lactate infusion
| DM | Maran et al. [ | 0.6 | 0.03 | 140 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.10 | b | b | b | b | b |
| Veneman et al. [ | b | 0.05 + 0.03 | 20 + 70 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| King et al. [ | 600 | 0.04 | 125 | 3.3 | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| King et al. [ | 600 | 0.04 | 125 | 3.5 | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Maran et al. [ | b | 0.03 | 60 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| De Feyter et al. [ | b | 0.01 | 105 | 1.8 | 1.05 | d | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Wiegers et al. [ | 600 | A) 0.05 + 0.03 B) 0.04 + 0.025 | A) 15 + 85 B) 15 + 85 | 3.5 | A) 3.3 B) 2.725 | A) 3.3 B) 2.725 | 0.07 | b | b | b | b | b | |
| TBI | Gallagher et al. [ | 4 | 1.2 × 10–6 c | b | b | d | d | b | b | b | b | b | b |
| Ichai et al. [ | 504.1 | 0.76 | 15 | 2.7 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 100.5%f | 101.4%f | b | b | b | b | |
| Ichai et al. [ | 500 | 0.00417 | 2880 | 1.5 | 12 | 12 | 0.12 | 7 | b | b | b | b | |
| Bouzat et al. [ | 1000 | 0.04 + 0.03 | 60 + 120 | 5 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 0.04 | 1.96 | b | b | b | b | |
| Glenn et al. [ | b | 5.7c | 90 | 7.1 | 513e | d | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Bisri et al. [ | 504.1 | 0.013 | 15 | b | 0.189 | 0.189 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Quintard et al. [ | 1000 | 0.04 | 180 | 4–5 | 7.2 | 7.2 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Carteron et al. [ | 1000 | 0.03 | 180 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.4 | b | 6 | b | b | b | b | |
| Jalloh et al. [ | 8 | 2.4 × 10–6 c | b | b | d | d | b | 3 | b | b | b | b | |
| Wolahan et al. [ | 890 | 0.5 + 0.163 | 5 + 180 | 1.9 | 29.34 | 29.34 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| AD | Járdánházy et al. [ | 500 | 0.125 | 20 | b | 2.5 | 2.5 | b | b | b | b | b | b |
| Kálmán et al. [ | 500 | 0.125 | 20 | b | 2.5 | 2.5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Kálmán et al. [ | 500 | 0.125 | 20 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| CD | Boom et al. [ | 504.1 | 0.1 | 15 | 6.1 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 2 | 1.2 | b | b | b |
| Leverve et al. [ | 504.1 | 0.013 | 720 | 4.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | b | 2 | b | b | b | b | |
| Mustafa and Leverve [ | 1000 | 0.17 | 15 | 14.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.04 | 5 | 1.9 | b | b | b | |
| Nalos et al. [ | 500 | 0.1 + 0.0083 | 15 + 1440 | 4.5 | 12.15 | 12.15 | 0.05 | 10 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 6 | 0.25 | |
| DS | Somasetia et al. [ | 500 | 0.167 + 0.008 | 15 + 720 | 2.9 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 0.1g | 0.8 | 11.3g | 1.2 | 4.8 | b |
| PA | Dager et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b |
| Dager et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Dager et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | 10.8 | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Dager et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Friedman et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Layton et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Otte et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| van der Molen et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b | |
| Keck et al. [ | 500 | 0.25 | 20 | b | 5 | 5 | b | b | b | b | b | b |
DM diabetes mellitus, TBI traumatic brain injury, AD Alzheimer’s disease, CD cardiac disease, DS dengue shock, PA panic attack
aGallagher et al. and Jalloh et al. infused lactate via cerebral microdialysis, not intravenously
bNo information in article
cInfusion mmol/minute
dValuables cannot be calculated with available information
eTotal infused lactate mmol
fSide effects in article available in percentage of baseline value
gVenous measurement