Erica M Fatica1, Bethany J Larson2, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich2, Joshua A Bornhorst3. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Bornhorst.Joshua@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) is a glycoprotein biomarker for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). SCCA elevations have also been noted in other conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of an automated SCCA homogenous immunofluorescent assay (BRAHMS KRYPTOR). METHODS: Reference intervals were determined using 119 samples from healthy donors. To assess clinical performance, samples were collected from patients with cervical (n = 12), head and neck (n = 23), lung (n = 14), or cutaneous (n = 11) SCC in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: Upper 95th percentile sex-specific reference intervals were 2.00 μg/L for males and 1.67 μg/L for females. Intra- and inter-assay CVs were less than 5%. Comparison of the BRAHMS KRYPTOR to an ELISA SCCA immunoassay exhibited a correlation coefficient of 0.8809. The mean sensitivity for all SCC positive patients was 23.3%. With the exception of psoriasis (58.6%) specificity exceeded 95% for the non-SCC populations. CONCLUSION: The BRAHMS KRYPTOR SCCA assay showed good analytical performance and acceptable overall clinical specificity. Consistent with previous studies, the sensitivity of SCCA for SCC was low. In the absence of other robust circulating markers, SCCA remains an imperfect yet useful tool in the evaluation of SCC.
BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) is a glycoprotein biomarker for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). SCCA elevations have also been noted in other conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of an automated SCCA homogenous immunofluorescent assay (BRAHMS KRYPTOR). METHODS: Reference intervals were determined using 119 samples from healthy donors. To assess clinical performance, samples were collected from patients with cervical (n = 12), head and neck (n = 23), lung (n = 14), or cutaneous (n = 11) SCC in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: Upper 95th percentile sex-specific reference intervals were 2.00 μg/L for males and 1.67 μg/L for females. Intra- and inter-assay CVs were less than 5%. Comparison of the BRAHMS KRYPTOR to an ELISA SCCA immunoassay exhibited a correlation coefficient of 0.8809. The mean sensitivity for all SCC positive patients was 23.3%. With the exception of psoriasis (58.6%) specificity exceeded 95% for the non-SCC populations. CONCLUSION: The BRAHMS KRYPTOR SCCA assay showed good analytical performance and acceptable overall clinical specificity. Consistent with previous studies, the sensitivity of SCCA for SCC was low. In the absence of other robust circulating markers, SCCA remains an imperfect yet useful tool in the evaluation of SCC.